A randomized controlled trial of cryoprobe versus forceps for transbronchial biopsy (FROSTBITE-2): Study protocol for a multi-center pragmatic clinical trial
Jeffrey Thiboutot , Ardian Latifi , Peter Illei , Christopher M. Kapp , Fabien Maldonado , Sonali Sethi , Scott Shofer , Christopher Gilbert , Momen Wahidi , Andrew DeMaio , Ashutosh Sachdeva , David DiBardino , Anil Vachani , Nicholas Pastis , Daniela Molena , Miranda R. Jones , Najib M. Rahman , Gerard Silvestri , Lonny Yarmus
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of cryoprobe versus forceps for transbronchial biopsy (FROSTBITE-2): Study protocol for a multi-center pragmatic clinical trial","authors":"Jeffrey Thiboutot , Ardian Latifi , Peter Illei , Christopher M. Kapp , Fabien Maldonado , Sonali Sethi , Scott Shofer , Christopher Gilbert , Momen Wahidi , Andrew DeMaio , Ashutosh Sachdeva , David DiBardino , Anil Vachani , Nicholas Pastis , Daniela Molena , Miranda R. Jones , Najib M. Rahman , Gerard Silvestri , Lonny Yarmus","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transbronchial biopsy is a common bronchoscopic procedure that is traditionally performed with forceps. However, its diagnostic capability is limited by small specimen size and crush artifact. A 1.1 mm cryoprobe was developed to overcome these limitations utilizing rapid, controlled, freezing to retrieve larger specimens which are extractable through the bronchoscope's working channel. Whether this improves diagnostic yield remains uncertain. The 1.1 mm cryoprobe has not been directly compared to standard capacity forceps in a prospective, randomized fashion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluates whether transbronchial biopsy with a 1.1 mm cryoprobe yields superior diagnostic yield compared to standard capacity forceps in adults undergoing transbronchial biopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung disease, parenchymal pulmonary lesions, or lung allografts. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either biopsy tool, stratified by indication. Primary outcomes include indication-specific and overall diagnostic yield, adjudicated by centralized pathology review. Secondary outcomes include histologic quality metrics and complication rates. This trial is individually powered for each indication-specific primary outcome, and can detect an 11.3% difference in overall diagnostic yield with 250 participants per arm.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This trial will provide high-quality evidence to guide transbronchial biopsy tool selection to maximize diagnostic yield. Results of this trial may yield practice changing data for the evaluation of patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease, parenchymal pulmonary lesions, and lung allografts. Unique design features include the use of a centralized histopathology core to minimize bias and interobserver variability and a pragmatic design to facilitate integration into clinical workflows and optimize recruitment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714426000376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Transbronchial biopsy is a common bronchoscopic procedure that is traditionally performed with forceps. However, its diagnostic capability is limited by small specimen size and crush artifact. A 1.1 mm cryoprobe was developed to overcome these limitations utilizing rapid, controlled, freezing to retrieve larger specimens which are extractable through the bronchoscope's working channel. Whether this improves diagnostic yield remains uncertain. The 1.1 mm cryoprobe has not been directly compared to standard capacity forceps in a prospective, randomized fashion.
Methods
This multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluates whether transbronchial biopsy with a 1.1 mm cryoprobe yields superior diagnostic yield compared to standard capacity forceps in adults undergoing transbronchial biopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung disease, parenchymal pulmonary lesions, or lung allografts. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either biopsy tool, stratified by indication. Primary outcomes include indication-specific and overall diagnostic yield, adjudicated by centralized pathology review. Secondary outcomes include histologic quality metrics and complication rates. This trial is individually powered for each indication-specific primary outcome, and can detect an 11.3% difference in overall diagnostic yield with 250 participants per arm.
Discussion
This trial will provide high-quality evidence to guide transbronchial biopsy tool selection to maximize diagnostic yield. Results of this trial may yield practice changing data for the evaluation of patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease, parenchymal pulmonary lesions, and lung allografts. Unique design features include the use of a centralized histopathology core to minimize bias and interobserver variability and a pragmatic design to facilitate integration into clinical workflows and optimize recruitment.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.