Olaf Boenisch, Lena Schirmer, Antonia Zapf, Dagmar Lühmann, Burkhard Grein, Katrin Bangert-Tobies, Tobias B Huber, Hermann Reichenspurner, Stefan Blankenberg, Geraldine de Heer, Peter Tohsche, Martin Scherer, Ingmar Schäfer, Stefan Kluge
{"title":"Consent in Intensive Care: The Concurrence of Patients' and Families' Viewpoints. A Simulation Study","authors":"Olaf Boenisch, Lena Schirmer, Antonia Zapf, Dagmar Lühmann, Burkhard Grein, Katrin Bangert-Tobies, Tobias B Huber, Hermann Reichenspurner, Stefan Blankenberg, Geraldine de Heer, Peter Tohsche, Martin Scherer, Ingmar Schäfer, Stefan Kluge","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients in intensive care cannot communicate their preferences about treatment, therapeutic goals, and expectations of quality of life, and physicians must therefore speak to their families to determine what they would want. We studied the accordance between patients' preferences about intensive care and the worst impairment of quality of life that they would be willing to accept and their families' assessment of these preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inpatients on non-intensive-care wards at risk for future need of intensive care and their relatives were separately asked about the patient's wishes concerning eight treatment options and six quality-of-life goals. Degrees of accordance were studied with simple matching and Manhattan Distance Scores, and associations between patient features and degrees of accordance were determined by linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Actual and presumed patient wishes agreed in 82.1% of cases on average. Depending on the measure in question, 1.0% to 8.6% of families wrongly thought that the patient would reject it, and 0% to 6.7% wrongly thought that the patient would accept it. The postulated and actual wishes of the patient about tolerable impairments of quality of life agreed in 86.4% of cases on average. Degrees of accordance were greater when the family members' wishes for themselves more closely resembled those of the patient (adjusted mean differences: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [0.39; 0.65], p < 0.001 and 0.66 [0.51; 0.81], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When patients' wishes are misjudged, the treatment they receive may not be in their best interest. Clear communication ahead of time between patients and their relatives, as well as the provision of information on this topic in advance by medical personnel, may lessen uncertainty about future intensive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many patients in intensive care cannot communicate their preferences about treatment, therapeutic goals, and expectations of quality of life, and physicians must therefore speak to their families to determine what they would want. We studied the accordance between patients' preferences about intensive care and the worst impairment of quality of life that they would be willing to accept and their families' assessment of these preferences.
Methods: Inpatients on non-intensive-care wards at risk for future need of intensive care and their relatives were separately asked about the patient's wishes concerning eight treatment options and six quality-of-life goals. Degrees of accordance were studied with simple matching and Manhattan Distance Scores, and associations between patient features and degrees of accordance were determined by linear regression analysis.
Results: Actual and presumed patient wishes agreed in 82.1% of cases on average. Depending on the measure in question, 1.0% to 8.6% of families wrongly thought that the patient would reject it, and 0% to 6.7% wrongly thought that the patient would accept it. The postulated and actual wishes of the patient about tolerable impairments of quality of life agreed in 86.4% of cases on average. Degrees of accordance were greater when the family members' wishes for themselves more closely resembled those of the patient (adjusted mean differences: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [0.39; 0.65], p < 0.001 and 0.66 [0.51; 0.81], p < 0.001).
Conclusion: When patients' wishes are misjudged, the treatment they receive may not be in their best interest. Clear communication ahead of time between patients and their relatives, as well as the provision of information on this topic in advance by medical personnel, may lessen uncertainty about future intensive care.
期刊介绍:
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence.
The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include:
Carelit
CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
Compendex
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database)
EMNursing
GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data)
HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative)
Index Copernicus
Medline (MEDLARS Online)
Medpilot
PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database)
Science Citation Index Expanded
Scopus
By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.