Comparison of Different Maintenance Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed BRCAwt Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-04 DOI:10.1177/15330338261416162
Xi Chen, Chenyan Fang, Yanglong Guo, Yingli Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of Different Maintenance Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed <i>BRCA</i>wt Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Xi Chen, Chenyan Fang, Yanglong Guo, Yingli Zhang","doi":"10.1177/15330338261416162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionNiraparib and bevacizumab are two principal maintenance therapies for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients with <i>BRCA</i> wild-type (<i>BRCA</i>wt) status, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). In China, however, a considerable proportion of <i>BRCA</i>wt patients have unknown or untested HRD status, complicating treatment selection.MethodsTo evaluate and compare the efficacy of niraparib and bevacizumab as maintenance therapy for <i>BRCA</i>wt AOC, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using real-world clinical data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and demographic characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. A multivariable Cox regression was performed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted, and propensity score matching (PSM) was applied as a sensitivity analysis.ResultsA total of 94 patients were included, with 51 receiving niraparib and 43 receiving bevacizumab. The median PFS was not reached in the niraparib group versus 13.77 months (95% CI, 4.12-23.41) in the bevacizumab group (HR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.128-0.451; <i>P</i> < .001). After covariate adjustment, the median PFS was 19.55 months (95% CI, 9.40-NA) with niraparib and 8.64 months (95% CI, 4.53-NA) with bevacizumab, with an adjusted HR of 0.282 (95% CI, 0.136-0.587; <i>P</i> = .001). In the PSM sensitivity analysis, the median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 19.55-NR) in the niraparib group and was 18.33 months (95% CI, 8.90-25.26) in the bevacizumab group (HR = 0.360, 95% CI, 0.176-0.736; <i>P</i> = .005).ConclusionThis analysis suggests that niraparib may provide a progression-free survival advantage compared with bevacizumab in <i>BRCA</i>wt AOC patients, with both regimens appearing to be generally well tolerated in the real-world setting. These findings offer preliminary reference value for maintenance treatment selection in patients with newly diagnosed <i>BRCA</i>wt AOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"25 ","pages":"15330338261416162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12873068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338261416162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionNiraparib and bevacizumab are two principal maintenance therapies for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) status, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). In China, however, a considerable proportion of BRCAwt patients have unknown or untested HRD status, complicating treatment selection.MethodsTo evaluate and compare the efficacy of niraparib and bevacizumab as maintenance therapy for BRCAwt AOC, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using real-world clinical data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and demographic characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. A multivariable Cox regression was performed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted, and propensity score matching (PSM) was applied as a sensitivity analysis.ResultsA total of 94 patients were included, with 51 receiving niraparib and 43 receiving bevacizumab. The median PFS was not reached in the niraparib group versus 13.77 months (95% CI, 4.12-23.41) in the bevacizumab group (HR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.128-0.451; P < .001). After covariate adjustment, the median PFS was 19.55 months (95% CI, 9.40-NA) with niraparib and 8.64 months (95% CI, 4.53-NA) with bevacizumab, with an adjusted HR of 0.282 (95% CI, 0.136-0.587; P = .001). In the PSM sensitivity analysis, the median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 19.55-NR) in the niraparib group and was 18.33 months (95% CI, 8.90-25.26) in the bevacizumab group (HR = 0.360, 95% CI, 0.176-0.736; P = .005).ConclusionThis analysis suggests that niraparib may provide a progression-free survival advantage compared with bevacizumab in BRCAwt AOC patients, with both regimens appearing to be generally well tolerated in the real-world setting. These findings offer preliminary reference value for maintenance treatment selection in patients with newly diagnosed BRCAwt AOC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新诊断的brcat晚期卵巢癌不同维持治疗方案的比较:回顾性队列分析。
尼拉帕尼和贝伐单抗是新诊断的BRCA野生型(brcat)晚期卵巢癌(AOC)患者的两种主要维持疗法,无论是否存在同源重组缺陷(HRD)。然而,在中国,相当大比例的brcat患者有未知或未经检测的HRD状态,这使治疗选择复杂化。方法为了评估和比较尼拉帕尼和贝伐单抗作为brcat AOC维持治疗的疗效,我们使用现实世界的临床数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。描述性统计用于总结临床和人口学特征。使用Kaplan-Meier分析估计无进展生存期(PFS),并使用分层Cox比例风险模型进行比较。采用多变量Cox回归来调整潜在的混杂变量。进行探索性亚组分析,并采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)作为敏感性分析。结果共纳入94例患者,其中51例接受尼拉帕尼治疗,43例接受贝伐单抗治疗。尼拉帕尼组未达到中位PFS,而贝伐单抗组为13.77个月(95% CI, 4.12-23.41) (HR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.128-0.451; P = 0.001)。在PSM敏感性分析中,尼拉帕尼组的中位PFS未达到(95% CI, 19.55-NR),贝伐单抗组的中位PFS为18.33个月(95% CI, 8.90-25.26) (HR = 0.360, 95% CI, 0.176-0.736; P = 0.005)。该分析表明,在brcat AOC患者中,与贝伐单抗相比,尼拉帕尼可能提供无进展生存优势,两种方案在现实环境中似乎都具有良好的耐受性。这些发现对新诊断的BRCAwt AOC患者的维持治疗选择具有初步的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书