Yang Lu, Catharine E Fairbairn, Jiaxu Han, Nigel Bosch
{"title":"Mobile Health for Alcohol Use Assessment: Longitudinal Effects of Breathalyzer Self-Monitoring in Everyday Contexts.","authors":"Yang Lu, Catharine E Fairbairn, Jiaxu Han, Nigel Bosch","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20241170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although mobile health-tracking technologies have burgeoned, offering objective health information to consumers on an unprecedented scale, opportunities to directly test effects of such monitoring have been limited. Low-cost mobile breathalyzers are one tool commonly employed for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) assessment. The authors explored outcomes linked with BAC-tracking technologies, examining effects on alcohol use and self-estimation of BAC levels in a large U.S. sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=32,179) were individuals who voluntarily purchased a mobile breathalyzer and provided at least three ad-lib readings between 2016 and 2022. A paired smartphone application prompted users to enter a BAC self-estimate (a guess) before the measured BAC level was displayed. Analyses included observations collected during active consumption (BAC >0.00%) from breathalyzer users who opted to share anonymized data. Breathalyzer users who displayed inattentive patterns of guessing were excluded from self-estimation analyses. The final dataset comprised 787,393 BAC readings and 387,643 self-estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of BAC guesses increased by 2.38% over the course of breathalyzer use. Associations between breathalyzer use and BAC levels varied significantly according to participants' initial drinking levels (b=-0.0062, 95% CI=-0.0065, -0.0059). Among heavy-drinking participants, BAC levels decreased on average from 0.106% to 0.096%, whereas the reverse trend was observed for lighter-drinking participants, whose levels increased from 0.058% to 0.067%. A similar interaction emerged for BAC underestimation (b=-0.0058, 95% CI=-0.0066, -0.0049), with odds of underestimation decreasing among heavy-drinking and increasing among light-drinking participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate promise for mobile BAC-tracking technologies as a low-impact intervention with the potential to decrease drinking among individuals who drink heavily-a population particularly susceptible to alcohol-related problems. In contrast, inverted trends emerged for light-drinking individuals, highlighting the need for empirical research in the fast-moving landscape of digital health.</p>","PeriodicalId":520786,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"251-259"},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20241170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Although mobile health-tracking technologies have burgeoned, offering objective health information to consumers on an unprecedented scale, opportunities to directly test effects of such monitoring have been limited. Low-cost mobile breathalyzers are one tool commonly employed for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) assessment. The authors explored outcomes linked with BAC-tracking technologies, examining effects on alcohol use and self-estimation of BAC levels in a large U.S. sample.
Methods: Participants (N=32,179) were individuals who voluntarily purchased a mobile breathalyzer and provided at least three ad-lib readings between 2016 and 2022. A paired smartphone application prompted users to enter a BAC self-estimate (a guess) before the measured BAC level was displayed. Analyses included observations collected during active consumption (BAC >0.00%) from breathalyzer users who opted to share anonymized data. Breathalyzer users who displayed inattentive patterns of guessing were excluded from self-estimation analyses. The final dataset comprised 787,393 BAC readings and 387,643 self-estimates.
Results: The accuracy of BAC guesses increased by 2.38% over the course of breathalyzer use. Associations between breathalyzer use and BAC levels varied significantly according to participants' initial drinking levels (b=-0.0062, 95% CI=-0.0065, -0.0059). Among heavy-drinking participants, BAC levels decreased on average from 0.106% to 0.096%, whereas the reverse trend was observed for lighter-drinking participants, whose levels increased from 0.058% to 0.067%. A similar interaction emerged for BAC underestimation (b=-0.0058, 95% CI=-0.0066, -0.0049), with odds of underestimation decreasing among heavy-drinking and increasing among light-drinking participants.
Conclusions: The results indicate promise for mobile BAC-tracking technologies as a low-impact intervention with the potential to decrease drinking among individuals who drink heavily-a population particularly susceptible to alcohol-related problems. In contrast, inverted trends emerged for light-drinking individuals, highlighting the need for empirical research in the fast-moving landscape of digital health.