Mobile Health for Alcohol Use Assessment: Longitudinal Effects of Breathalyzer Self-Monitoring in Everyday Contexts.

IF 14.7
The American journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-04 DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.20241170
Yang Lu, Catharine E Fairbairn, Jiaxu Han, Nigel Bosch
{"title":"Mobile Health for Alcohol Use Assessment: Longitudinal Effects of Breathalyzer Self-Monitoring in Everyday Contexts.","authors":"Yang Lu, Catharine E Fairbairn, Jiaxu Han, Nigel Bosch","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20241170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although mobile health-tracking technologies have burgeoned, offering objective health information to consumers on an unprecedented scale, opportunities to directly test effects of such monitoring have been limited. Low-cost mobile breathalyzers are one tool commonly employed for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) assessment. The authors explored outcomes linked with BAC-tracking technologies, examining effects on alcohol use and self-estimation of BAC levels in a large U.S. sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=32,179) were individuals who voluntarily purchased a mobile breathalyzer and provided at least three ad-lib readings between 2016 and 2022. A paired smartphone application prompted users to enter a BAC self-estimate (a guess) before the measured BAC level was displayed. Analyses included observations collected during active consumption (BAC >0.00%) from breathalyzer users who opted to share anonymized data. Breathalyzer users who displayed inattentive patterns of guessing were excluded from self-estimation analyses. The final dataset comprised 787,393 BAC readings and 387,643 self-estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of BAC guesses increased by 2.38% over the course of breathalyzer use. Associations between breathalyzer use and BAC levels varied significantly according to participants' initial drinking levels (b=-0.0062, 95% CI=-0.0065, -0.0059). Among heavy-drinking participants, BAC levels decreased on average from 0.106% to 0.096%, whereas the reverse trend was observed for lighter-drinking participants, whose levels increased from 0.058% to 0.067%. A similar interaction emerged for BAC underestimation (b=-0.0058, 95% CI=-0.0066, -0.0049), with odds of underestimation decreasing among heavy-drinking and increasing among light-drinking participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate promise for mobile BAC-tracking technologies as a low-impact intervention with the potential to decrease drinking among individuals who drink heavily-a population particularly susceptible to alcohol-related problems. In contrast, inverted trends emerged for light-drinking individuals, highlighting the need for empirical research in the fast-moving landscape of digital health.</p>","PeriodicalId":520786,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"251-259"},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20241170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although mobile health-tracking technologies have burgeoned, offering objective health information to consumers on an unprecedented scale, opportunities to directly test effects of such monitoring have been limited. Low-cost mobile breathalyzers are one tool commonly employed for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) assessment. The authors explored outcomes linked with BAC-tracking technologies, examining effects on alcohol use and self-estimation of BAC levels in a large U.S. sample.

Methods: Participants (N=32,179) were individuals who voluntarily purchased a mobile breathalyzer and provided at least three ad-lib readings between 2016 and 2022. A paired smartphone application prompted users to enter a BAC self-estimate (a guess) before the measured BAC level was displayed. Analyses included observations collected during active consumption (BAC >0.00%) from breathalyzer users who opted to share anonymized data. Breathalyzer users who displayed inattentive patterns of guessing were excluded from self-estimation analyses. The final dataset comprised 787,393 BAC readings and 387,643 self-estimates.

Results: The accuracy of BAC guesses increased by 2.38% over the course of breathalyzer use. Associations between breathalyzer use and BAC levels varied significantly according to participants' initial drinking levels (b=-0.0062, 95% CI=-0.0065, -0.0059). Among heavy-drinking participants, BAC levels decreased on average from 0.106% to 0.096%, whereas the reverse trend was observed for lighter-drinking participants, whose levels increased from 0.058% to 0.067%. A similar interaction emerged for BAC underestimation (b=-0.0058, 95% CI=-0.0066, -0.0049), with odds of underestimation decreasing among heavy-drinking and increasing among light-drinking participants.

Conclusions: The results indicate promise for mobile BAC-tracking technologies as a low-impact intervention with the potential to decrease drinking among individuals who drink heavily-a population particularly susceptible to alcohol-related problems. In contrast, inverted trends emerged for light-drinking individuals, highlighting the need for empirical research in the fast-moving landscape of digital health.

移动健康的酒精使用评估:在日常环境中呼气测醉器自我监测的纵向影响。
目的:尽管移动健康跟踪技术迅速发展,以前所未有的规模向消费者提供客观的健康信息,但直接测试这种监测效果的机会有限。低成本的移动呼气测醉器是一种通常用于血液酒精浓度评估的工具。作者探讨了与BAC跟踪技术相关的结果,检查了美国大量样本中酒精使用和BAC水平自我估计的影响。方法:参与者(N= 32179)是在2016年至2022年期间自愿购买移动呼气测醉器并提供至少三次随机读数的个人。一个配对的智能手机应用程序提示用户在测量的BAC水平显示之前输入一个自我估计(猜测)。分析包括从选择共享匿名数据的呼气测醉器用户中收集的活跃消费(BAC 0.0.00%)观察结果。那些表现出不注意的猜测模式的酒精测试仪用户被排除在自我评估分析之外。最终的数据集包括787,393个BAC读数和387,643个自我估计。结果:在使用过程中,BAC猜测的准确性提高了2.38%。呼气测醉器的使用与BAC水平之间的关联根据参与者最初的饮酒水平而有显著差异(b=-0.0062, 95% CI=-0.0065, -0.0059)。在重度饮酒者中,BAC水平平均从0.106%下降到0.096%,而在轻度饮酒者中则相反,其水平从0.058%上升到0.067%。BAC低估也出现了类似的相互作用(b=-0.0058, 95% CI=-0.0066, -0.0049),重度饮酒者低估的几率减少,轻度饮酒者低估的几率增加。结论:研究结果表明,移动bac跟踪技术作为一种低影响的干预手段,有可能减少重度饮酒者的饮酒量,而重度饮酒者特别容易受到酒精相关问题的影响。相比之下,轻度饮酒者出现了相反的趋势,这突显了在快速发展的数字健康领域进行实证研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书