Exploring Australian community pharmacists' perspectives, practices and use of emergency hormonal contraception guidelines: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

IF 1.3
Ruth A Nona, Robin A Ray, Selina M Taylor, Beverley D Glass
{"title":"Exploring Australian community pharmacists' perspectives, practices and use of emergency hormonal contraception guidelines: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.","authors":"Ruth A Nona, Robin A Ray, Selina M Taylor, Beverley D Glass","doi":"10.1071/PY25181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency hormonal contraceptive pills (ECP), a safe and effective way to reduce the risk of unwanted pregnancy, are available without a prescription in community pharmacies in Australia, and >90 countries globally. Supply is informed by practice guidelines for pharmacists in several countries; however, use remains limited. This study aimed to explore the perspectives and practices of community pharmacists in Australia when providing ECP, to identify challenges and facilitators encountered when using ECP practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with purposively sampled Australian community pharmacists who actively supplied ECP, from across a diversity of locations and years of practice. Interview questions were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, thematically analysed inductively, then deductively mapped against the Theoretical Domains Framework and double coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen interviews were conducted. The four overarching themes - decision-making in ECP provision, geographic variation in practice, guideline use, and knowledge gaps and training needs - could be mapped against seven of the 10 relevant Theoretical Domains Framework domains. A lack of confidence and up-to-date knowledge among pharmacists was a challenge to optimal provision of ECP. Practice guidelines were acknowledged to contain valuable information, but were difficult to interpret, and use was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Australian pharmacists' perspective of their practice in providing ECP has highlighted the challenges and facilitators to the use of the ECP practice guidelines. Guidelines were seen as inaccessible, ambiguous and impractical, indicating the need for future research to optimise their use. Findings can inform targeted interventions to enhance ECP guideline uptake and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY25181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency hormonal contraceptive pills (ECP), a safe and effective way to reduce the risk of unwanted pregnancy, are available without a prescription in community pharmacies in Australia, and >90 countries globally. Supply is informed by practice guidelines for pharmacists in several countries; however, use remains limited. This study aimed to explore the perspectives and practices of community pharmacists in Australia when providing ECP, to identify challenges and facilitators encountered when using ECP practice guidelines.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with purposively sampled Australian community pharmacists who actively supplied ECP, from across a diversity of locations and years of practice. Interview questions were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, thematically analysed inductively, then deductively mapped against the Theoretical Domains Framework and double coded.

Results: Seventeen interviews were conducted. The four overarching themes - decision-making in ECP provision, geographic variation in practice, guideline use, and knowledge gaps and training needs - could be mapped against seven of the 10 relevant Theoretical Domains Framework domains. A lack of confidence and up-to-date knowledge among pharmacists was a challenge to optimal provision of ECP. Practice guidelines were acknowledged to contain valuable information, but were difficult to interpret, and use was limited.

Conclusions: Australian pharmacists' perspective of their practice in providing ECP has highlighted the challenges and facilitators to the use of the ECP practice guidelines. Guidelines were seen as inaccessible, ambiguous and impractical, indicating the need for future research to optimise their use. Findings can inform targeted interventions to enhance ECP guideline uptake and improve patient outcomes.

探索澳大利亚社区药剂师的观点,实践和使用紧急激素避孕指南:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
背景:紧急激素避孕药(ECP)是一种安全有效的降低意外怀孕风险的方法,在澳大利亚和全球90多个国家的社区药房都可以获得,无需处方。供应情况由若干国家的药剂师执业指南提供;然而,使用仍然有限。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚社区药剂师在提供ECP时的观点和实践,以确定在使用ECP实践指南时遇到的挑战和促进因素。方法:从不同的地点和多年的实践中,有目的地抽样积极提供ECP的澳大利亚社区药剂师进行半结构化访谈。访谈问题由理论领域框架提供。访谈录音,逐字转录,主题分析归纳,然后演绎映射到理论领域框架和双重编码。结果:共进行了17次访谈。这四个总体主题——ECP提供中的决策、实践中的地理差异、指南的使用以及知识差距和培训需求——可以映射到10个相关理论领域框架领域中的7个。缺乏信心和最新的知识药师是一个挑战,以最佳提供ECP。实践指南被认为包含有价值的信息,但难以解释,使用受到限制。结论:澳大利亚药剂师在提供ECP实践方面的观点强调了ECP实践指南使用的挑战和促进因素。指南被认为是难以获得的、模糊的和不切实际的,这表明需要未来的研究来优化它们的使用。研究结果可以为有针对性的干预提供信息,以增强ECP指南的吸收并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书