High-Flow Nasal Cannula Reduces Ventilatory Requirements During Endobronchial Ultrasound.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Respiratory care Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1177/19433654251412342
Jeffrey Miechels, Niels J M Claessens, Mark V Koning
{"title":"High-Flow Nasal Cannula Reduces Ventilatory Requirements During Endobronchial Ultrasound.","authors":"Jeffrey Miechels, Niels J M Claessens, Mark V Koning","doi":"10.1177/19433654251412342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) reduces dead-space ventilation, but this effect is diminished by open-mouth breathing and partial airway obstruction. Consequently, it is uncertain whether HFNC provides respiratory support during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center randomized controlled crossover study was conducted at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from November 2022 to August 2024.Patients with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were evaluated to determine if HFNC reduces dead space ventilation during an EBUS procedure. Exclusion criteria were known neurodegenerative conditions, allergies to propofol or esketamine, pregnancy, upper-airway obstructions, or severe pulmonary hypertension.Subjects received two sequences of HFNC flow (30 and 70 L/min or vice versa) during EBUS.The primary outcome was CO<sub>2</sub> washout, determined by a 60-s capnography trace with and without HFNC flow to measure the difference in inspiratory, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub>, and β-angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty subjects with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were included (Group A <i>n</i> = 10; Group B <i>n</i> = 10), of which one could not complete the bronchial measurements because of an obstructing carcinoma. CO<sub>2</sub> washout at carina was observed at 70 L/min of HFNC flow, demonstrated by a reduced inspiratory CO<sub>2</sub> of mean 6.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.5-8.3, <i>P</i> < .001) and end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> of 5.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.3-7.5, <i>P</i> = .002), but not at 30 L/min of HFNC flow (mean inspiratory CO<sub>2</sub> difference of 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 6.0, <i>P</i> = .69) and mean end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> difference of 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 3.0, <i>P</i> = .35). A flow of 70 L/min reduced inspiratory CO<sub>2</sub> in the left main bronchus (mean = 5.3 mm Hg; 95% CI: 2.3-8.3, <i>P</i> < .001), but not the end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (mean = 3.0 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.0-6.0, <i>P</i> = .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An HFNC flow of 70 L/min reduced dead-space ventilation in subjects with severe COPD undergoing EBUS procedures during deep sedation, suggesting respiratory support during this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"453-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654251412342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) reduces dead-space ventilation, but this effect is diminished by open-mouth breathing and partial airway obstruction. Consequently, it is uncertain whether HFNC provides respiratory support during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedures.

Methods: A single-center randomized controlled crossover study was conducted at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from November 2022 to August 2024.Patients with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were evaluated to determine if HFNC reduces dead space ventilation during an EBUS procedure. Exclusion criteria were known neurodegenerative conditions, allergies to propofol or esketamine, pregnancy, upper-airway obstructions, or severe pulmonary hypertension.Subjects received two sequences of HFNC flow (30 and 70 L/min or vice versa) during EBUS.The primary outcome was CO2 washout, determined by a 60-s capnography trace with and without HFNC flow to measure the difference in inspiratory, end-tidal CO2, and β-angle.

Results: Twenty subjects with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were included (Group A n = 10; Group B n = 10), of which one could not complete the bronchial measurements because of an obstructing carcinoma. CO2 washout at carina was observed at 70 L/min of HFNC flow, demonstrated by a reduced inspiratory CO2 of mean 6.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.5-8.3, P < .001) and end-tidal CO2 of 5.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.3-7.5, P = .002), but not at 30 L/min of HFNC flow (mean inspiratory CO2 difference of 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 6.0, P = .69) and mean end-tidal CO2 difference of 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 3.0, P = .35). A flow of 70 L/min reduced inspiratory CO2 in the left main bronchus (mean = 5.3 mm Hg; 95% CI: 2.3-8.3, P < .001), but not the end-tidal CO2 (mean = 3.0 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.0-6.0, P = .07).

Conclusions: An HFNC flow of 70 L/min reduced dead-space ventilation in subjects with severe COPD undergoing EBUS procedures during deep sedation, suggesting respiratory support during this procedure.

高流量鼻插管减少支气管内超声通气需求。
背景:高流量鼻插管(HFNC)可减少死腔通气,但这种效果会因张口呼吸和部分气道阻塞而减弱。因此,不确定HFNC是否在支气管超声(EBUS)过程中提供呼吸支持。方法:于2022年11月至2024年8月在荷兰阿纳姆Rijnstate医院进行单中心随机对照交叉研究。对严重COPD患者(Gold III/IV)进行评估,以确定HFNC是否能减少EBUS手术期间的死腔通气。排除标准为已知的神经退行性疾病、对异丙酚或艾氯胺酮过敏、妊娠、上呼吸道阻塞或严重肺动脉高压。受试者在EBUS期间接受两个序列的HFNC流(30和70 L/min,反之亦然)。主要结果是CO2洗脱,通过有和没有HFNC流量的60秒血糖描画来测量吸气、潮末CO2和β角的差异。结果:纳入20例重度COPD (Gold III/IV)患者(A组n = 10, B组n = 10),其中1例因梗阻性癌无法完成支气管测量。二氧化碳冲刷在船底座观察70 L / min HFNC流,通过降低平均6.0毫米汞柱的吸入二氧化碳(95%置信区间:4.5—-8.3,P <措施)和5.3 mm Hg end-tidal二氧化碳(95%置信区间:2.3—-7.5,P = .002),但不是30 L / min HFNC流(平均吸入二氧化碳差1.5毫米汞柱(95%置信区间CI: -2.3 - 6.0, P = i)和平均end-tidal二氧化碳0.8毫米汞柱的区别(95%置信区间CI: -2.3 - 3.0, P = .35点)。70 L/min的流量可降低左主支气管吸入CO2(平均值= 5.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: 2.3-8.3, P < 0.001),但不能降低末潮CO2(平均值= 3.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: 0.0-6.0, P = 0.07)。结论:70 L/min的HFNC流量减少了重度COPD患者在深度镇静期间进行EBUS手术的死腔通气,提示在此过程中支持呼吸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书