What is the best way to secure a chest drain? A scoping review.

IF 1.9 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2026-01-29 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437251412171
Chit Wong, Joshua Wright, Francesco Luke Siena, Philip Breedon, David W Hewson, Martin Beed
{"title":"What is the best way to secure a chest drain? A scoping review.","authors":"Chit Wong, Joshua Wright, Francesco Luke Siena, Philip Breedon, David W Hewson, Martin Beed","doi":"10.1177/17511437251412171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Each year, around 30,000 intercostal chest drains (ICDs) are inserted in the UK, with complications like displacement being a common concern. Various fixation techniques have been proposed to secure ICDs, but there is no consensus on a gold standard. A scoping review was conducted to identify publications describing ICD fixation methods and frequency with which they become dislodged. Three databases were reviewed: MEDLINE from 1946 to 17th October 2024 through the Ovid<sup>®</sup> website portal, PubMed<sup>®</sup>, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Appropriate search terms and synonyms were applied with Boolean operators and from 5275 identified records 63 were included for review. Nine ICD fixation principles were identified to classify fixation methods: kinking; Poisson-effect (\"Roman Sandal\"); suture \"through\" the tube; tube fixation points (cuffs or wings); friction/adhesion (from ties or dressings); external coiling/locking/flattening; internal balloons; internal coiling (pigtails); subcutaneous tunnelling. Many fixation methods combined more than one principle. Although no definitive conclusions on the best fixation method can be drawn from this review, trends suggest that incorporating sutures or using combined techniques, such as sutures paired with dressings, cable ties or balloon catheters, may enhance ICD security. In laboratory conditions, the highest pull force was associated with the modified Jo'berg knot. Further robust studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of different fixation methods superior in terms of displacement rate, but also taking into account pain, skin integrity, wound leakage/infection, or ease of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"198-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12854997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251412171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Each year, around 30,000 intercostal chest drains (ICDs) are inserted in the UK, with complications like displacement being a common concern. Various fixation techniques have been proposed to secure ICDs, but there is no consensus on a gold standard. A scoping review was conducted to identify publications describing ICD fixation methods and frequency with which they become dislodged. Three databases were reviewed: MEDLINE from 1946 to 17th October 2024 through the Ovid® website portal, PubMed®, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Appropriate search terms and synonyms were applied with Boolean operators and from 5275 identified records 63 were included for review. Nine ICD fixation principles were identified to classify fixation methods: kinking; Poisson-effect ("Roman Sandal"); suture "through" the tube; tube fixation points (cuffs or wings); friction/adhesion (from ties or dressings); external coiling/locking/flattening; internal balloons; internal coiling (pigtails); subcutaneous tunnelling. Many fixation methods combined more than one principle. Although no definitive conclusions on the best fixation method can be drawn from this review, trends suggest that incorporating sutures or using combined techniques, such as sutures paired with dressings, cable ties or balloon catheters, may enhance ICD security. In laboratory conditions, the highest pull force was associated with the modified Jo'berg knot. Further robust studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of different fixation methods superior in terms of displacement rate, but also taking into account pain, skin integrity, wound leakage/infection, or ease of use.

确保胸腔引流的最佳方法是什么?范围审查。
在英国,每年大约有30,000个肋间胸腔引流器(icd)被植入,而移位等并发症是一个常见的问题。已经提出了各种固定技术来保护icd,但在黄金标准上没有达成共识。进行了范围审查,以确定描述ICD固定方法和其移位频率的出版物。通过Ovid®网站门户网站、PubMed®和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)审查了三个数据库:MEDLINE从1946年到2024年10月17日。使用布尔运算符应用适当的搜索词和同义词,并从5275条已识别的记录中包括63条以供审查。确定了9种ICD固定原则,将固定方法分为:扭结固定;泊松效应(《罗曼·桑达尔》);“穿过”管子缝合;管固定点(袖口或翼);摩擦/粘附(来自领带或敷料);外部卷/锁定/压扁;内部气球;内卷(辫子);皮下隧道。许多固定方法结合了不止一种原理。虽然从这篇综述中无法得出最佳固定方法的明确结论,但趋势表明,结合缝线或使用联合技术,如缝线与敷料、电缆扎带或球囊导管配合使用,可能会提高ICD的安全性。在实验室条件下,最大的拉力与改进的Jo'berg结有关。需要进一步的研究来比较不同固定方法在移位率方面的有效性,但也要考虑疼痛、皮肤完整性、伤口渗漏/感染或易用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书