Human Detection Capacity of Vehicle Front Sonar Sensors in Light and Small Passenger Cars and Minivan.

Q2 Medicine
Stapp car crash journal Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-16 DOI:10.4271/2025-22-0009
Yasuhiro Matsui, Shoko Oikawa
{"title":"Human Detection Capacity of Vehicle Front Sonar Sensors in Light and Small Passenger Cars and Minivan.","authors":"Yasuhiro Matsui, Shoko Oikawa","doi":"10.4271/2025-22-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sonar sensor systems have been developed to prevent collisions between vehicles and surrounding objects by employing ultrasonic sensors mounted at the front of the vehicle. These systems warn drivers when nearby obstacles are detected. However, relatively few studies have examined the capacity of sonar to detect humans. This study aims to clarify the human detection capacity of front sonar sensors installed in two light passenger cars (LPC-I and LPC-II), one small passenger car (SPC), and one minivan (MNV). The LPC-I, SPC, and MNV were equipped with center and corner sensors, whereas the LPC-II had only corner sensors. Three volunteers-a child, an adult female, and an adult male-participated in the study. Human detectability was assessed using the \"maximum detection distance ratio,\" defined as the ratio of the maximum detection distance for a volunteer to that for a standard pipe. The results showed that both the center and corner sensors consistently detected front- and side-facing human volunteers. For front-facing human volunteers, the maximum detection distance ratios relative to the pipe were 99-101% (child), 93-101% (adult female), and 98-101% (adult male) for the center sonar sensor, and 99-102%, 94-102%, and 96-100% for the corner sensor. For side-facing human volunteers, the corresponding ratios were 97-100%, 92-97%, and 94-99% for the center sensor, and 95-99%, 91-98%, and 93-98% for the corner sensor. These detection ratios were closely aligned with those of the pipe. These findings suggest that front sonar sensors can effectively detect humans prior to vehicle motion initiation, indicating their potential to reduce low-speed vehicle collisions with nearby pedestrians.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"69 ","pages":"219-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-22-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sonar sensor systems have been developed to prevent collisions between vehicles and surrounding objects by employing ultrasonic sensors mounted at the front of the vehicle. These systems warn drivers when nearby obstacles are detected. However, relatively few studies have examined the capacity of sonar to detect humans. This study aims to clarify the human detection capacity of front sonar sensors installed in two light passenger cars (LPC-I and LPC-II), one small passenger car (SPC), and one minivan (MNV). The LPC-I, SPC, and MNV were equipped with center and corner sensors, whereas the LPC-II had only corner sensors. Three volunteers-a child, an adult female, and an adult male-participated in the study. Human detectability was assessed using the "maximum detection distance ratio," defined as the ratio of the maximum detection distance for a volunteer to that for a standard pipe. The results showed that both the center and corner sensors consistently detected front- and side-facing human volunteers. For front-facing human volunteers, the maximum detection distance ratios relative to the pipe were 99-101% (child), 93-101% (adult female), and 98-101% (adult male) for the center sonar sensor, and 99-102%, 94-102%, and 96-100% for the corner sensor. For side-facing human volunteers, the corresponding ratios were 97-100%, 92-97%, and 94-99% for the center sensor, and 95-99%, 91-98%, and 93-98% for the corner sensor. These detection ratios were closely aligned with those of the pipe. These findings suggest that front sonar sensors can effectively detect humans prior to vehicle motion initiation, indicating their potential to reduce low-speed vehicle collisions with nearby pedestrians.

车辆前声纳传感器在轻、小型乘用车和小型货车上的人体探测能力。
声纳传感器系统已经被开发出来,通过安装在车辆前部的超声波传感器来防止车辆与周围物体之间的碰撞。当检测到附近的障碍物时,这些系统会向驾驶员发出警告。然而,相对较少的研究已经检验了声纳探测人类的能力。本研究旨在阐明安装在两辆轻型乘用车(LPC-I和LPC-II)、一辆小型乘用车(SPC)和一辆小型货车(MNV)上的前声纳传感器的人体探测能力。lpc - 1、SPC和MNV配备了中心和角落传感器,而LPC-II只有角落传感器。三名志愿者——一名儿童、一名成年女性和一名成年男性参与了这项研究。人类的可探测性是用“最大探测距离比”来评估的,它被定义为志愿者的最大探测距离与标准管道的最大探测距离之比。结果表明,中心和角落的传感器都能检测到正面和侧面的人类志愿者。对于正面朝向的人类志愿者,中心声纳传感器相对于管道的最大探测距离比分别为99-101%(儿童)、93-101%(成年女性)和98-101%(成年男性),角落声纳传感器相对于管道的最大探测距离比分别为99-102%、94-102%和96-100%。对于面向侧面的人类志愿者,中心传感器对应的比例分别为97-100%、92-97%和94-99%,角落传感器对应的比例分别为95-99%、91-98%和93-98%。这些检测比与管道的检测比密切一致。这些发现表明,前声纳传感器可以在车辆运动开始之前有效地检测到人类,这表明它们有可能减少低速车辆与附近行人的碰撞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书