Assessment and management of cervical spine fractures in the emergency department in the UK: a review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kayaththery Varathan, Havil S Bakka, Mustafa Albayati, Uzair Khan, Tharaga Kirupakan
{"title":"Assessment and management of cervical spine fractures in the emergency department in the UK: a review.","authors":"Kayaththery Varathan, Havil S Bakka, Mustafa Albayati, Uzair Khan, Tharaga Kirupakan","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.25.11014-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical spine fractures are a critical concern in emergency medicine, often resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and management are essential to prevent secondary spinal cord injuries and optimize patient outcomes. This review examines current assessment and treatment strategies for cervical spine fractures in the emergency department. Clinical decision rules such as the Canadian C-Spine Rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) aid in determining the need for imaging, while computed tomography remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Traditional immobilization techniques, including manual inline spinal immobilization and cervical collars, are widely used, though recent evidence challenges their effectiveness in reducing neurological deterioration. Management approaches vary depending on the severity and stability of the fracture, with stable injuries often treated conservatively and unstable fractures requiring surgical intervention. New evidence suggests that a more individualized approach to immobilization and management may be beneficial, balancing patient comfort and clinical outcomes. Adherence to established trauma protocols remains critical in ensuring timely intervention and reducing complications. Further research is necessary to refine immobilization practices and develop more targeted treatment strategies to improve long-term outcomes for patients with cervical spine fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":"80 6","pages":"479-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.25.11014-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cervical spine fractures are a critical concern in emergency medicine, often resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and management are essential to prevent secondary spinal cord injuries and optimize patient outcomes. This review examines current assessment and treatment strategies for cervical spine fractures in the emergency department. Clinical decision rules such as the Canadian C-Spine Rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) aid in determining the need for imaging, while computed tomography remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Traditional immobilization techniques, including manual inline spinal immobilization and cervical collars, are widely used, though recent evidence challenges their effectiveness in reducing neurological deterioration. Management approaches vary depending on the severity and stability of the fracture, with stable injuries often treated conservatively and unstable fractures requiring surgical intervention. New evidence suggests that a more individualized approach to immobilization and management may be beneficial, balancing patient comfort and clinical outcomes. Adherence to established trauma protocols remains critical in ensuring timely intervention and reducing complications. Further research is necessary to refine immobilization practices and develop more targeted treatment strategies to improve long-term outcomes for patients with cervical spine fractures.

评估和管理颈椎骨折的急诊科在英国:回顾。
颈椎骨折是急诊医学的一个重要问题,经常导致显著的发病率和死亡率。早期识别和管理对于预防继发性脊髓损伤和优化患者预后至关重要。本文综述了目前在急诊科对颈椎骨折的评估和治疗策略。临床决策规则,如加拿大颈椎规则和国家紧急x线摄影应用研究(NEXUS)有助于确定是否需要影像学检查,而计算机断层扫描仍然是诊断的金标准。传统的固定技术,包括手动内嵌脊柱固定和颈套,被广泛使用,尽管最近的证据挑战了它们在减少神经系统恶化方面的有效性。治疗方法因骨折的严重程度和稳定性而异,稳定性损伤通常采用保守治疗,不稳定性骨折则需要手术干预。新的证据表明,更加个性化的固定和管理方法可能是有益的,平衡患者舒适度和临床结果。在确保及时干预和减少并发症方面,遵守既定的创伤治疗方案仍然至关重要。为了改善颈椎骨折患者的长期预后,需要进一步的研究来完善固定方法和制定更有针对性的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书