Elemental impurities in Yataprasen Thai Polyherbal Formulation: source-dependent variation, and analytical method validation.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Jaenjira Angsusing, Yu-Ki Tanaka, Chuda Chittasupho, Yasumitsu Ogra
{"title":"Elemental impurities in Yataprasen Thai Polyherbal Formulation: source-dependent variation, and analytical method validation.","authors":"Jaenjira Angsusing, Yu-Ki Tanaka, Chuda Chittasupho, Yasumitsu Ogra","doi":"10.2131/jts.51.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global consumption of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has risen dramatically. However, safety concerns persist owing to contamination with elemental impurities. In this study, we optimized and validated an analytical method for quantifying four toxic metals, As, Cd, Pb, and Hg, in Yataprasen (YTPS) extract, a complex Thai traditional polyherbal formulation. Samples were obtained from natural collection sites and commercial sources, and the contributions of 13 individual herbs to total impurities were evaluated. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was applied following four acid-digestion protocols. Quantification involved external calibration and standard addition, with validation covering LOD, LOQ, linearity, precision, and recovery. Toxicological risk was assessed in accordance with the ICH Q3D(R2) guideline. Digestion with 1 mL of HNO<sub>3</sub> gave the highest accuracy and recovery. Cd and Pb levels showed little variation across methods. Validation demonstrated excellent accuracy (93.6-107.5% recovery), strong linearity (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.998), and low detection limits (<1.5 µg/kg). A significant difference in elemental impurity concentration was observed between the two sources, with the naturally collected YTPS exhibiting markedly higher levels of all four metals than the commercial one. While external calibration was sufficient for commercial samples, standard addition was required for naturally sourced samples to overcome matrix effects. Component analysis identified Allium sativum L., Cymbopogon nardus (L.) Rendle, and Melia azedarach L. as the major contributors to the impurity burden. Source-dependent variation in elemental impurity concentration was observed in YTPS extracts, with natural collection posing a greater toxicological concern. The validated analytical workflow provides a robust platform for quality control and regulatory assessment of traditional polyherbal formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17654,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","volume":"51 2","pages":"111-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.51.111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global consumption of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has risen dramatically. However, safety concerns persist owing to contamination with elemental impurities. In this study, we optimized and validated an analytical method for quantifying four toxic metals, As, Cd, Pb, and Hg, in Yataprasen (YTPS) extract, a complex Thai traditional polyherbal formulation. Samples were obtained from natural collection sites and commercial sources, and the contributions of 13 individual herbs to total impurities were evaluated. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was applied following four acid-digestion protocols. Quantification involved external calibration and standard addition, with validation covering LOD, LOQ, linearity, precision, and recovery. Toxicological risk was assessed in accordance with the ICH Q3D(R2) guideline. Digestion with 1 mL of HNO3 gave the highest accuracy and recovery. Cd and Pb levels showed little variation across methods. Validation demonstrated excellent accuracy (93.6-107.5% recovery), strong linearity (R2 > 0.998), and low detection limits (<1.5 µg/kg). A significant difference in elemental impurity concentration was observed between the two sources, with the naturally collected YTPS exhibiting markedly higher levels of all four metals than the commercial one. While external calibration was sufficient for commercial samples, standard addition was required for naturally sourced samples to overcome matrix effects. Component analysis identified Allium sativum L., Cymbopogon nardus (L.) Rendle, and Melia azedarach L. as the major contributors to the impurity burden. Source-dependent variation in elemental impurity concentration was observed in YTPS extracts, with natural collection posing a greater toxicological concern. The validated analytical workflow provides a robust platform for quality control and regulatory assessment of traditional polyherbal formulations.

泰复方中元素杂质:来源依赖性变异及分析方法验证。
全球补充和替代医学(CAM)的消费量急剧上升。然而,由于元素杂质的污染,安全问题仍然存在。在本研究中,我们优化并验证了一种定量测定泰国传统复方复方YTPS提取物中砷、镉、铅和汞四种有毒金属的分析方法。从天然采集点和商业来源获得样品,并评估了13种草药对总杂质的贡献。采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS),遵循四种酸消化方案。定量包括外部校准和标准品添加,验证包括LOD, LOQ,线性度,精密度和回收率。按照ICH Q3D(R2)指南进行毒理学风险评估。用1ml HNO3溶出,准确度和回收率最高。不同方法的Cd和Pb含量变化不大。验证结果表明:准确度高(回收率93.6 ~ 107.5%),线性度高(R2 > 0.998),检出限低(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (J. Toxicol. Sci.) is a scientific journal that publishes research about the mechanisms and significance of the toxicity of substances, such as drugs, food additives, food contaminants and environmental pollutants. Papers on the toxicities and effects of extracts and mixtures containing unidentified compounds cannot be accepted as a general rule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书