Darren McKnight , Erin Dale , Joe Cassady , Andy Ratcliffe , Satomi Kawamoto , Alessandro Rossi , Dmitriy Grishko
{"title":"Top 50 List for 2025","authors":"Darren McKnight , Erin Dale , Joe Cassady , Andy Ratcliffe , Satomi Kawamoto , Alessandro Rossi , Dmitriy Grishko","doi":"10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.12.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growth of orbital debris in number and mass in low Earth orbit (LEO) has been a subject of analysis for decades. The global community established the 25-yr debris mitigation rule 20–25 years ago and at that time many started assembling long lists of number, mass, and nationality of abandoned hardware. In 2020, a team of 19 experts from 13 countries assembled to create a definitive list of 50 objects that would most likely directly drive debris growth in LEO. This list was provided as a “priority list” for active debris removal (ADR) operations. Since 2020, continued accumulation of derelict objects coupled with the rapid increase of operational satellites has occurred. This combination has motivated the authors to update the 2020 Top 50 List. The new list considers (a) aggregate collision risk (i.e., probability of collision x consequence) since January 1, 2022, (b) orbital persistence of fragments (if a collision occurs), (c) proximity to existing altitudes where aggregate statistical risk of the population is the largest (meaning clusters centered around 775 km, 840 km, 1000 km, and 1400 km), (d) mass of object, and (e) coupling between removing objects on the list.</div><div>The paper is enabled through the application of new analytic tools created by LeoLabs based on empirical observations of close approaches in LEO merged with open-source tagging of objects in the public catalogue with known masses. It is important to note the coauthors abide by the philosophy that many viable models can be used to derive the top 50 objects to be removed from LEO. The benefit of the current approach applies a team approach to adjusting filters to a single model; however, the implication is not that this model is the only way to select the top 50 objects. In essence, one of the most critical aspects of any attempt to identify the objects whose retrieval will decrease the debris-generating potential in LEO is to identify key features of objects such as mass, probability of collision (especially with other massive objects), altitude, etc. A comparison of the 2020 Top 50 List and the new 2025 Top 50 List is provided to illuminate key lessons for debris hazard evolution and to motivate operationalization of ADR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44971,"journal":{"name":"Acta Astronautica","volume":"243 ","pages":"Pages 346-357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Astronautica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576525009002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The growth of orbital debris in number and mass in low Earth orbit (LEO) has been a subject of analysis for decades. The global community established the 25-yr debris mitigation rule 20–25 years ago and at that time many started assembling long lists of number, mass, and nationality of abandoned hardware. In 2020, a team of 19 experts from 13 countries assembled to create a definitive list of 50 objects that would most likely directly drive debris growth in LEO. This list was provided as a “priority list” for active debris removal (ADR) operations. Since 2020, continued accumulation of derelict objects coupled with the rapid increase of operational satellites has occurred. This combination has motivated the authors to update the 2020 Top 50 List. The new list considers (a) aggregate collision risk (i.e., probability of collision x consequence) since January 1, 2022, (b) orbital persistence of fragments (if a collision occurs), (c) proximity to existing altitudes where aggregate statistical risk of the population is the largest (meaning clusters centered around 775 km, 840 km, 1000 km, and 1400 km), (d) mass of object, and (e) coupling between removing objects on the list.
The paper is enabled through the application of new analytic tools created by LeoLabs based on empirical observations of close approaches in LEO merged with open-source tagging of objects in the public catalogue with known masses. It is important to note the coauthors abide by the philosophy that many viable models can be used to derive the top 50 objects to be removed from LEO. The benefit of the current approach applies a team approach to adjusting filters to a single model; however, the implication is not that this model is the only way to select the top 50 objects. In essence, one of the most critical aspects of any attempt to identify the objects whose retrieval will decrease the debris-generating potential in LEO is to identify key features of objects such as mass, probability of collision (especially with other massive objects), altitude, etc. A comparison of the 2020 Top 50 List and the new 2025 Top 50 List is provided to illuminate key lessons for debris hazard evolution and to motivate operationalization of ADR.
期刊介绍:
Acta Astronautica is sponsored by the International Academy of Astronautics. Content is based on original contributions in all fields of basic, engineering, life and social space sciences and of space technology related to:
The peaceful scientific exploration of space,
Its exploitation for human welfare and progress,
Conception, design, development and operation of space-borne and Earth-based systems,
In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes selected proceedings of the annual International Astronautical Congress (IAC), transactions of the IAA and special issues on topics of current interest, such as microgravity, space station technology, geostationary orbits, and space economics. Other subject areas include satellite technology, space transportation and communications, space energy, power and propulsion, astrodynamics, extraterrestrial intelligence and Earth observations.