{"title":"Physics-informed deep neural network framework for prediction of fatigue crack growth in LPBF-manufactured metallic alloys","authors":"A. Ince","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2026.109522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A baseline Deep Neural Network (DNN) and two Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN-R and PINN-K<sub>max</sub>) were developed for predicting fatigue crack growth rates (<em>da/dN</em>) in Ti–6Al–4V, IN625, and 17-4PH alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Unlike traditional analytical models that rely only on driving force parameters such as <em>ΔK</em> and <em>R</em>, the network models integrate process parameters, mechanical properties, and fracture mechanics driving forces to capture complex interdependencies between manufacturing, material behavior, and crack growth response. The PINN models enforce monotonic constraints on the crack growth rate with respect to <em>ΔK</em> and either <em>R</em> (PINN-R) or the maximum stress-intensity factor <em>K<sub>max</sub></em> (PINN-K<sub>max</sub>) by ensuring physical consistency while improving generalization. Models’ performance is assessed under two data splitting methods based on random K-fold cross-validation and grouped split by dataset IDs. A classical Walker model fitted on the same data provided a fracture-mechanics baseline. Under both data split methods, predictions from all neural models mainly fall within a ±3 × scatter band for all three alloys. The PINNs, particularly PINN-K<em><sub>max</sub></em> generally achieved better performance with lower RMSE and higher R<sup>2</sup> than the baseline DNN and Walker model, especially in the Paris and rapid-growth regimes. The results highlight the novelty of embedding physics into data-driven models by indicating a robust, physics-aware machine learning framework for fatigue crack growth prediction in LPBF alloys.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 109522"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112326000423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A baseline Deep Neural Network (DNN) and two Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN-R and PINN-Kmax) were developed for predicting fatigue crack growth rates (da/dN) in Ti–6Al–4V, IN625, and 17-4PH alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Unlike traditional analytical models that rely only on driving force parameters such as ΔK and R, the network models integrate process parameters, mechanical properties, and fracture mechanics driving forces to capture complex interdependencies between manufacturing, material behavior, and crack growth response. The PINN models enforce monotonic constraints on the crack growth rate with respect to ΔK and either R (PINN-R) or the maximum stress-intensity factor Kmax (PINN-Kmax) by ensuring physical consistency while improving generalization. Models’ performance is assessed under two data splitting methods based on random K-fold cross-validation and grouped split by dataset IDs. A classical Walker model fitted on the same data provided a fracture-mechanics baseline. Under both data split methods, predictions from all neural models mainly fall within a ±3 × scatter band for all three alloys. The PINNs, particularly PINN-Kmax generally achieved better performance with lower RMSE and higher R2 than the baseline DNN and Walker model, especially in the Paris and rapid-growth regimes. The results highlight the novelty of embedding physics into data-driven models by indicating a robust, physics-aware machine learning framework for fatigue crack growth prediction in LPBF alloys.
期刊介绍:
Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address:
Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements)
Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading
Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions
Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions)
Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects
Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue
Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation)
Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering
Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation
Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.