Physics-informed deep neural network framework for prediction of fatigue crack growth in LPBF-manufactured metallic alloys

IF 6.8 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
International Journal of Fatigue Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2026.109522
A. Ince
{"title":"Physics-informed deep neural network framework for prediction of fatigue crack growth in LPBF-manufactured metallic alloys","authors":"A. Ince","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2026.109522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A baseline Deep Neural Network (DNN) and two Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN-R and PINN-K<sub>max</sub>) were developed for predicting fatigue crack growth rates (<em>da/dN</em>) in Ti–6Al–4V, IN625, and 17-4PH alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Unlike traditional analytical models that rely only on driving force parameters such as <em>ΔK</em> and <em>R</em>, the network models integrate process parameters, mechanical properties, and fracture mechanics driving forces to capture complex interdependencies between manufacturing, material behavior, and crack growth response. The PINN models enforce monotonic constraints on the crack growth rate with respect to <em>ΔK</em> and either <em>R</em> (PINN-R) or the maximum stress-intensity factor <em>K<sub>max</sub></em> (PINN-K<sub>max</sub>) by ensuring physical consistency while improving generalization. Models’ performance is assessed under two data splitting methods based on random K-fold cross-validation and grouped split by dataset IDs. A classical Walker model fitted on the same data provided a fracture-mechanics baseline. Under both data split methods, predictions from all neural models mainly fall within a ±3 × scatter band for all three alloys. The PINNs, particularly PINN-K<em><sub>max</sub></em> generally achieved better performance with lower RMSE and higher R<sup>2</sup> than the baseline DNN and Walker model, especially in the Paris and rapid-growth regimes. The results highlight the novelty of embedding physics into data-driven models by indicating a robust, physics-aware machine learning framework for fatigue crack growth prediction in LPBF alloys.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 109522"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112326000423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A baseline Deep Neural Network (DNN) and two Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN-R and PINN-Kmax) were developed for predicting fatigue crack growth rates (da/dN) in Ti–6Al–4V, IN625, and 17-4PH alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Unlike traditional analytical models that rely only on driving force parameters such as ΔK and R, the network models integrate process parameters, mechanical properties, and fracture mechanics driving forces to capture complex interdependencies between manufacturing, material behavior, and crack growth response. The PINN models enforce monotonic constraints on the crack growth rate with respect to ΔK and either R (PINN-R) or the maximum stress-intensity factor Kmax (PINN-Kmax) by ensuring physical consistency while improving generalization. Models’ performance is assessed under two data splitting methods based on random K-fold cross-validation and grouped split by dataset IDs. A classical Walker model fitted on the same data provided a fracture-mechanics baseline. Under both data split methods, predictions from all neural models mainly fall within a ±3 × scatter band for all three alloys. The PINNs, particularly PINN-Kmax generally achieved better performance with lower RMSE and higher R2 than the baseline DNN and Walker model, especially in the Paris and rapid-growth regimes. The results highlight the novelty of embedding physics into data-driven models by indicating a robust, physics-aware machine learning framework for fatigue crack growth prediction in LPBF alloys.
基于物理信息的深度神经网络框架预测lpbf制造的金属合金疲劳裂纹扩展
建立了一个基线深度神经网络(DNN)和两个物理信息神经网络(PINN-R和PINN-Kmax),用于预测激光粉末床熔化(LPBF)生产的Ti-6Al-4V, IN625和17-4PH合金的疲劳裂纹扩展速率(da/dN)。与仅依赖于驱动力参数(如ΔK和R)的传统分析模型不同,网络模型集成了工艺参数、机械性能和断裂力学驱动力,以捕获制造、材料行为和裂纹扩展响应之间复杂的相互依赖关系。PINN模型在保证物理一致性的同时提高了通用性,从而对ΔK和R (PINN-R)或最大应力强度因子Kmax (PINN-Kmax)的裂纹扩展速率施加单调约束。在随机k折交叉验证和按数据集id分组分割两种数据分割方法下,对模型的性能进行了评估。基于相同数据的经典Walker模型提供了断裂力学基线。在两种数据分割方法下,所有神经模型对所有三种合金的预测主要落在±3 ×散射带内。与基线DNN和Walker模型相比,pinn,特别是PINN-Kmax通常在RMSE较低和R2较高的情况下获得更好的性能,特别是在巴黎和快速增长制度下。研究结果强调了将物理嵌入数据驱动模型的新颖性,为LPBF合金的疲劳裂纹扩展预测提供了一个强大的、物理感知的机器学习框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fatigue
International Journal of Fatigue 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
21.70%
发文量
619
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address: Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements) Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions) Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation) Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书