“It's like scratching at the door”: Experiences of outpatient buprenorphine low dose initiation among people using fentanyl

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Leslie W. Suen , Elyssa Samayoa , Matthew A. Spinelli , Maia Scarpetta , Kelly R. Knight , Julia Chael , Christine S. Soran , Michelle Geier , Hannah R. Snyder , Phillip O. Coffin
{"title":"“It's like scratching at the door”: Experiences of outpatient buprenorphine low dose initiation among people using fentanyl","authors":"Leslie W. Suen ,&nbsp;Elyssa Samayoa ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Spinelli ,&nbsp;Maia Scarpetta ,&nbsp;Kelly R. Knight ,&nbsp;Julia Chael ,&nbsp;Christine S. Soran ,&nbsp;Michelle Geier ,&nbsp;Hannah R. Snyder ,&nbsp;Phillip O. Coffin","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2026.209893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The fentanyl-driven overdose crisis has heightened challenges in buprenorphine initiation, as traditional methods risk precipitated withdrawal due to fentanyl's prolonged presence in the body. Buprenorphine low-dose initiation (LDI) offers a gradual approach to starting buprenorphine but requires continued full-agonist opioid use in outpatient settings, where success rates remain low and patient experiences have not been evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify barriers and facilitators to successful LDI completion and inform strategies to improve outpatient buprenorphine treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted 19 semi-structured interviews with people with opioid use disorder using fentanyl who had attempted LDI in the past three months. Using the COM-B framework, we applied thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to LDI completion from interviews until reaching thematic saturation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found that barriers and facilitators to LDI completion were linked to five COM-B model components: physical capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, reflective motivation, and automatic motivation. Despite high desirability and acceptability among participants towards starting LDI, several main barriers to LDI completion emerged, including difficulty tolerating “waves” of discomfort throughout LDI, anticipatory anxiety of precipitated withdrawal with each buprenorphine dose, lack of symptomatic response from small buprenorphine doses, loss of “high” from fentanyl, readily available fentanyl access leading to temptations to use, unstable or triggering housing environments, and being around others using fentanyl. Facilitators for completing LDI included increased optimism for success, the appeal of gradual recovery, bubble-packing medications, use of prescribed and non-prescribed drugs, supportive personal relationships, and non-stigmatizing clinic and pharmacy environments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study applied a novel behavior-change framework to understanding barriers and facilitators to LDI completion. Barriers aligned closely with the COM-B model, providing a foundation for developing future interventions to enhance buprenorphine uptake and acceptability among people with OUD using fentanyl. Addressing barriers to automatic motivation is likely to have the largest benefit, with interventions such as incentivization (<em>e.g.</em>, gift cards for completing LDI), environmental restructuring (<em>e.g.</em>, temporary housing or comfort spaces for LDI), behavior modeling (<em>e.g.</em>, peer coaches), and enablement (<em>e.g.</em>, 24/7 phone lines for patients to call) most directly addressing this barrier category.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 209893"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875926000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The fentanyl-driven overdose crisis has heightened challenges in buprenorphine initiation, as traditional methods risk precipitated withdrawal due to fentanyl's prolonged presence in the body. Buprenorphine low-dose initiation (LDI) offers a gradual approach to starting buprenorphine but requires continued full-agonist opioid use in outpatient settings, where success rates remain low and patient experiences have not been evaluated.

Objectives

To identify barriers and facilitators to successful LDI completion and inform strategies to improve outpatient buprenorphine treatment.

Methods

We conducted 19 semi-structured interviews with people with opioid use disorder using fentanyl who had attempted LDI in the past three months. Using the COM-B framework, we applied thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to LDI completion from interviews until reaching thematic saturation.

Results

We found that barriers and facilitators to LDI completion were linked to five COM-B model components: physical capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, reflective motivation, and automatic motivation. Despite high desirability and acceptability among participants towards starting LDI, several main barriers to LDI completion emerged, including difficulty tolerating “waves” of discomfort throughout LDI, anticipatory anxiety of precipitated withdrawal with each buprenorphine dose, lack of symptomatic response from small buprenorphine doses, loss of “high” from fentanyl, readily available fentanyl access leading to temptations to use, unstable or triggering housing environments, and being around others using fentanyl. Facilitators for completing LDI included increased optimism for success, the appeal of gradual recovery, bubble-packing medications, use of prescribed and non-prescribed drugs, supportive personal relationships, and non-stigmatizing clinic and pharmacy environments.

Conclusions

Our study applied a novel behavior-change framework to understanding barriers and facilitators to LDI completion. Barriers aligned closely with the COM-B model, providing a foundation for developing future interventions to enhance buprenorphine uptake and acceptability among people with OUD using fentanyl. Addressing barriers to automatic motivation is likely to have the largest benefit, with interventions such as incentivization (e.g., gift cards for completing LDI), environmental restructuring (e.g., temporary housing or comfort spaces for LDI), behavior modeling (e.g., peer coaches), and enablement (e.g., 24/7 phone lines for patients to call) most directly addressing this barrier category.
“就像在抓门”:门诊使用芬太尼的人群中低剂量丁丙诺啡的经验。
背景:芬太尼驱动的过量危机加剧了丁丙诺啡起始治疗的挑战,因为传统方法由于芬太尼在体内的长期存在而有沉淀停药的风险。丁丙诺啡低剂量起始(LDI)提供了逐步开始丁丙诺啡的方法,但需要在门诊环境中继续使用全面激动剂阿片类药物,成功率仍然很低,患者的经历尚未得到评估。目的:确定成功完成LDI的障碍和促进因素,并告知改善门诊丁丙诺啡治疗的策略。方法:我们对19名使用芬太尼的阿片类药物使用障碍患者进行了半结构化访谈,这些患者在过去三个月内曾尝试过LDI。使用COM-B框架,我们应用主题分析来确定从访谈到达到主题饱和的LDI完成的障碍和促进因素。结果:我们发现完成LDI的障碍和促进因素与COM-B模型的五个组成部分有关:身体能力、身体机会、社会机会、反思动机和自动动机。尽管参与者对开始LDI有很高的期望和接受度,但完成LDI的几个主要障碍出现了,包括难以忍受LDI过程中不适的“波”,每次丁丙诺啡剂量的提前戒断的预期焦虑,小剂量丁丙诺啡缺乏症状反应,芬太尼失去“高”,随时可用的芬太尼导致使用诱惑,不稳定或触发住房环境,周围的人都在使用芬太尼。促进完成LDI的因素包括对成功的乐观情绪增加,逐渐恢复的吸引力,气泡包装药物,处方药和非处方药的使用,支持性的个人关系,以及非污名化的诊所和药房环境。结论:我们的研究应用了一个新的行为改变框架来理解LDI完成的障碍和促进因素。障碍与COM-B模型密切相关,为开发未来干预措施提供了基础,以提高使用芬太尼的OUD患者对丁丙诺啡的吸收和接受程度。解决自动动机的障碍可能会带来最大的好处,干预措施包括激励(例如,完成LDI的礼品卡),环境重组(例如,LDI的临时住房或舒适空间),行为建模(例如,同伴教练)和使能(例如,24/7电话线供患者呼叫)最直接地解决这一障碍类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书