Could hair cortisol in free-ranging cattle be a proxy of wolf predation patterns?

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Conservation Physiology Pub Date : 2026-01-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/conphys/coag002
Marta Rafael, Eliana Fonseca, Nuno Santos, Mónia Nakamura
{"title":"Could hair cortisol in free-ranging cattle be a proxy of wolf predation patterns?","authors":"Marta Rafael, Eliana Fonseca, Nuno Santos, Mónia Nakamura","doi":"10.1093/conphys/coag002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cortisol is a biomarker of grey wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>) prey selection on wild ungulates. Throughout its range, wolves may prey on free-range livestock, leading to conflicts with humans. This can compromise wolf conservation through culling or poaching. We investigate whether glucocorticoid concentration could be a biomarker of individual prey selection by grey wolves that depredate on free-ranging cattle (<i>Bos taurus</i>). To achieve this, cortisol concentration in hair samples from live (<i>n</i> = 46) and wolf-preyed (<i>n</i> = 19) cattle was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic variables-namely age, sex and food availability-on hair cortisol concentration (HCC) were investigated through linear mixed models with farm as a random effect. The analysis revealed that, against our initial hypothesis, wolf-preyed cattle had significantly lower HCC than live cattle (<i>P</i> = 0.009). Additionally, HCC was lower in subadults than in adults (<i>P</i> = 0.002), and was negatively correlated with food availability in adults, but not in subadults (<i>P</i> = 0.003). These results suggest that predation risk does not necessarily equal long-term physiological stress. Alternatively, it may indicate that cattle chronically exposed to stressors (i.e. presenting higher HCC) may exhibit more effective anti-predatory behaviours. Additionally, food availability for cattle may influence wolf predation patterns, as cattle may expand their foraging area by exploring unfamiliar areas, thereby increasing the likelihood of predator encounters. Further research is required to understand the relationship between the multitude of stressors acting on free-range cattle and wolf prey selection, with the aim of assessing the risk of individual cattle and eventually managing predation risk and human-wolf conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":54331,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Physiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"coag002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coag002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cortisol is a biomarker of grey wolf (Canis lupus) prey selection on wild ungulates. Throughout its range, wolves may prey on free-range livestock, leading to conflicts with humans. This can compromise wolf conservation through culling or poaching. We investigate whether glucocorticoid concentration could be a biomarker of individual prey selection by grey wolves that depredate on free-ranging cattle (Bos taurus). To achieve this, cortisol concentration in hair samples from live (n = 46) and wolf-preyed (n = 19) cattle was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic variables-namely age, sex and food availability-on hair cortisol concentration (HCC) were investigated through linear mixed models with farm as a random effect. The analysis revealed that, against our initial hypothesis, wolf-preyed cattle had significantly lower HCC than live cattle (P = 0.009). Additionally, HCC was lower in subadults than in adults (P = 0.002), and was negatively correlated with food availability in adults, but not in subadults (P = 0.003). These results suggest that predation risk does not necessarily equal long-term physiological stress. Alternatively, it may indicate that cattle chronically exposed to stressors (i.e. presenting higher HCC) may exhibit more effective anti-predatory behaviours. Additionally, food availability for cattle may influence wolf predation patterns, as cattle may expand their foraging area by exploring unfamiliar areas, thereby increasing the likelihood of predator encounters. Further research is required to understand the relationship between the multitude of stressors acting on free-range cattle and wolf prey selection, with the aim of assessing the risk of individual cattle and eventually managing predation risk and human-wolf conflict.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自由放养的牛身上的毛发皮质醇能代表狼的捕食模式吗?
皮质醇是灰狼(Canis lupus)对野生有蹄类动物猎物选择的生物标志物。在整个活动范围内,狼可能会捕食自由放养的牲畜,从而导致与人类的冲突。这可能会通过扑杀或偷猎危及狼的保护。我们研究了糖皮质激素浓度是否可以作为灰狼捕食自由放养的牛(Bos taurus)时个体猎物选择的生物标志物。为了实现这一目标,用酶联免疫吸附法测定了活牛(n = 46)和狼捕食牛(n = 19)毛发样本中的皮质醇浓度。通过线性混合模型研究了内在变量和外在变量(即年龄、性别和食物供应)对毛发皮质醇浓度(HCC)的影响,并将农场作为随机效应。分析显示,与我们最初的假设相反,狼捕食牛的HCC显著低于活牛(P = 0.009)。此外,HCC在亚成人中的发生率低于成人(P = 0.002),并且与成人的食物可得性呈负相关,但在亚成人中没有(P = 0.003)。这些结果表明,捕食风险并不一定等于长期的生理压力。或者,这可能表明长期暴露于压力源(即呈现更高的HCC)的牛可能表现出更有效的反掠食性行为。此外,牛的食物供应可能会影响狼的捕食模式,因为牛可能会通过探索不熟悉的地区来扩大其觅食区域,从而增加遇到捕食者的可能性。为了评估个体牛的风险并最终控制捕食风险和人狼冲突,需要进一步的研究来了解影响自由放养牛的众多压力因素与狼的猎物选择之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Physiology
Conservation Physiology Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Physiology is an online only, fully open access journal published on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. Biodiversity across the globe faces a growing number of threats associated with human activities. Conservation Physiology will publish research on all taxa (microbes, plants and animals) focused on understanding and predicting how organisms, populations, ecosystems and natural resources respond to environmental change and stressors. Physiology is considered in the broadest possible terms to include functional and mechanistic responses at all scales. We also welcome research towards developing and refining strategies to rebuild populations, restore ecosystems, inform conservation policy, and manage living resources. We define conservation physiology broadly and encourage potential authors to contact the editorial team if they have any questions regarding the remit of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书