Patient safety culture in the operating room of African hospitals: a systematic review.

IF 3.3 Q1 SURGERY
Jacques Fadhili Bake, Naicen Ghanmi, Elena Guadagno, Kasereka Masumbuko Claude, Tsongo Kibendelwa Zacharie, Dan Poenaru
{"title":"Patient safety culture in the operating room of African hospitals: a systematic review.","authors":"Jacques Fadhili Bake, Naicen Ghanmi, Elena Guadagno, Kasereka Masumbuko Claude, Tsongo Kibendelwa Zacharie, Dan Poenaru","doi":"10.1186/s13037-025-00461-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient safety in operating rooms has globally improved through interventions such as the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist and multidisciplinary team training. However, while evidence from high-income countries is well documented, there remains limited consolidated knowledge on the understanding, application, and effectiveness of safety culture interventions in African surgical settings, which this review seeks to address.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review examined factors and protocols affecting surgical safety in African operating rooms. We hypothesized that persistent systemic barriers undermine safety culture despite adoption of global measures. Following PRISMA 2020, we searched eight databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Africa-Wide, CINAHL, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science) from inception to 5 December 2024, using variations of text words present in the title, abstract, or keyword fields, alongside relevant subject headings, to identify articles addressing surgical safety and culture throughout Africa. Included studies involved operating room professionals in African countries and used quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods designs. We excluded non-operating room settings, patient-only studies, inaccessible full texts, reviews, editorials, letters, conference abstracts, and duplicates. Two reviewers independently screened and appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesized narratively with subgroup analysis by study type and theme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9,875 identified records, 22 studies from 12 African countries (2014-2024) met inclusion criteria, with Ethiopia contributing the highest number (n = 4). Various assessment tools, including the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, and the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anaesthesia Plans interview manual, revealed recurring challenges: inadequate non-punitive responses to errors, communication barriers, hierarchical structures, and resource constraints. Four interventions showed promise: implementation and training on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, Safe Surgery 2020 initiatives, Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons training, and multidisciplinary training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The heterogeneity of study designs, sample sizes, and outcome measures limited direct comparisons and precluded meta-analysis. Nonetheless, the review highlights persistent barriers and emerging opportunities to strengthen patient safety culture in African operating rooms. While the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist remains valuable, sustainable progress requires multi-level strategies that address systemic constraints and incorporate context-sensitive adaptations.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42024627076.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00461-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient safety in operating rooms has globally improved through interventions such as the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist and multidisciplinary team training. However, while evidence from high-income countries is well documented, there remains limited consolidated knowledge on the understanding, application, and effectiveness of safety culture interventions in African surgical settings, which this review seeks to address.

Methods: This systematic review examined factors and protocols affecting surgical safety in African operating rooms. We hypothesized that persistent systemic barriers undermine safety culture despite adoption of global measures. Following PRISMA 2020, we searched eight databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Africa-Wide, CINAHL, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science) from inception to 5 December 2024, using variations of text words present in the title, abstract, or keyword fields, alongside relevant subject headings, to identify articles addressing surgical safety and culture throughout Africa. Included studies involved operating room professionals in African countries and used quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods designs. We excluded non-operating room settings, patient-only studies, inaccessible full texts, reviews, editorials, letters, conference abstracts, and duplicates. Two reviewers independently screened and appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesized narratively with subgroup analysis by study type and theme.

Results: Out of 9,875 identified records, 22 studies from 12 African countries (2014-2024) met inclusion criteria, with Ethiopia contributing the highest number (n = 4). Various assessment tools, including the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, and the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anaesthesia Plans interview manual, revealed recurring challenges: inadequate non-punitive responses to errors, communication barriers, hierarchical structures, and resource constraints. Four interventions showed promise: implementation and training on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, Safe Surgery 2020 initiatives, Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons training, and multidisciplinary training.

Conclusion: The heterogeneity of study designs, sample sizes, and outcome measures limited direct comparisons and precluded meta-analysis. Nonetheless, the review highlights persistent barriers and emerging opportunities to strengthen patient safety culture in African operating rooms. While the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist remains valuable, sustainable progress requires multi-level strategies that address systemic constraints and incorporate context-sensitive adaptations.

Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42024627076.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非洲医院手术室患者安全文化:系统回顾。
背景:通过诸如世界卫生组织(世卫组织)手术安全清单和多学科团队培训等干预措施,全球手术室患者安全得到了改善。然而,尽管来自高收入国家的证据有充分的记录,但关于非洲外科环境中安全文化干预措施的理解、应用和有效性的综合知识仍然有限,这是本综述试图解决的问题。方法:本系统综述探讨了影响非洲手术室手术安全的因素和方案。我们假设,尽管采取了全球措施,但持续存在的系统性障碍破坏了安全文化。在PRISMA 2020之后,我们搜索了八个数据库(Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Africa- wide, CINAHL, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science),从开始到2024年12月5日,使用标题、摘要或关键字字段中的文本词的变化,以及相关的主题标题,以确定涉及整个非洲手术安全和文化的文章。纳入的研究涉及非洲国家的手术室专业人员,采用定量、定性或混合方法设计。我们排除了非手术室设置、仅限患者的研究、无法访问的全文、综述、社论、信件、会议摘要和副本。两位审稿人使用混合方法评估工具独立筛选和评估研究。按研究类型和主题进行亚组分析,对研究结果进行叙述性综合。结果:在9875份确定的记录中,来自12个非洲国家(2014-2024年)的22项研究符合纳入标准,其中埃塞俄比亚贡献的数量最多(n = 4)。各种评估工具,包括医院对患者安全文化的调查、安全态度问卷和国家外科、产科和麻醉计划访谈手册,揭示了反复出现的挑战:对错误的非惩罚性反应不足、沟通障碍、等级结构和资源限制。有四项干预措施显示出希望:世卫组织手术安全清单的实施和培训、安全手术2020行动、外科医生非技术技能培训和多学科培训。结论:研究设计、样本量和结果测量的异质性限制了直接比较,并排除了meta分析。尽管如此,该综述强调了在非洲手术室加强患者安全文化的持续障碍和新出现的机会。虽然世卫组织手术安全清单仍然很有价值,但要取得可持续进展,就需要采取多层次战略,解决系统性制约因素并结合具体情况进行调整。报名:普洛斯彼罗,CRD42024627076。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书