OptimES: Optimizing federated learning using remote embeddings for graph neural networks

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Pranjal Naman, Yogesh Simmhan
{"title":"OptimES: Optimizing federated learning using remote embeddings for graph neural networks","authors":"Pranjal Naman,&nbsp;Yogesh Simmhan","doi":"10.1016/j.jpdc.2026.105227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have experienced rapid advancements in recent years due to their ability to learn meaningful representations from graph data structures. However, in most real-world settings, such as financial transaction networks and healthcare networks, this data is localized to different data owners and cannot be aggregated due to privacy concerns. Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a viable machine learning approach for training a shared model that iteratively aggregates local models trained on decentralized data. This addresses privacy concerns while leveraging parallelism. State-of-the-art methods enhance the privacy-respecting convergence accuracy of federated GNN training by sharing remote embeddings of boundary vertices through a server (EmbC). However, they are limited by diminished performance due to large communication costs. In this article, we propose OptimES, an optimized federated GNN training framework that employs remote neighbourhood pruning, overlapping the push of embeddings to the server with local training, and dynamic pulling of embeddings to reduce network costs and training time. We perform a rigorous evaluation of these strategies for four common graph datasets with up to 111<em>M</em> vertices and 1.6<em>B</em> edges. We see that a modest drop in per-round accuracy due to the preemptive push of embeddings is out-stripped by the reduction in per-round training time for large and dense graphs like Reddit and Products, converging up to  ≈ 3.5 ×  faster than EmbC and giving up to  ≈ 16% better accuracy than the default federated GNN learning. While accuracy improvements over default federated GNNs are modest for sparser graphs like Arxiv and Papers, they achieve the target accuracy about  ≈ 11 ×  faster than EmbC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 105227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743731526000055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have experienced rapid advancements in recent years due to their ability to learn meaningful representations from graph data structures. However, in most real-world settings, such as financial transaction networks and healthcare networks, this data is localized to different data owners and cannot be aggregated due to privacy concerns. Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a viable machine learning approach for training a shared model that iteratively aggregates local models trained on decentralized data. This addresses privacy concerns while leveraging parallelism. State-of-the-art methods enhance the privacy-respecting convergence accuracy of federated GNN training by sharing remote embeddings of boundary vertices through a server (EmbC). However, they are limited by diminished performance due to large communication costs. In this article, we propose OptimES, an optimized federated GNN training framework that employs remote neighbourhood pruning, overlapping the push of embeddings to the server with local training, and dynamic pulling of embeddings to reduce network costs and training time. We perform a rigorous evaluation of these strategies for four common graph datasets with up to 111M vertices and 1.6B edges. We see that a modest drop in per-round accuracy due to the preemptive push of embeddings is out-stripped by the reduction in per-round training time for large and dense graphs like Reddit and Products, converging up to  ≈ 3.5 ×  faster than EmbC and giving up to  ≈ 16% better accuracy than the default federated GNN learning. While accuracy improvements over default federated GNNs are modest for sparser graphs like Arxiv and Papers, they achieve the target accuracy about  ≈ 11 ×  faster than EmbC.
OptimES:使用图神经网络的远程嵌入优化联邦学习
近年来,由于能够从图数据结构中学习有意义的表示,图神经网络(gnn)取得了快速发展。然而,在大多数现实环境中,例如金融交易网络和医疗保健网络,这些数据被定位到不同的数据所有者,并且由于隐私问题而无法聚合。联邦学习(FL)已经成为一种可行的机器学习方法,用于训练共享模型,该模型迭代地聚合在分散数据上训练的本地模型。这在利用并行性的同时解决了隐私问题。最先进的方法通过服务器(EmbC)共享边界顶点的远程嵌入,提高了联邦GNN训练的尊重隐私的收敛精度。然而,由于通信成本高,性能下降,它们受到限制。在本文中,我们提出了一种优化的联邦GNN训练框架OptimES,该框架采用远程邻域修剪,将嵌入与本地训练重叠推送到服务器,以及动态提取嵌入以减少网络成本和训练时间。我们对四个常见的图形数据集进行了严格的评估,这些数据集有多达111M个顶点和1.6B条边。我们看到,对于大型和密集的图(如Reddit和Products),由于抢先推送嵌入而导致的每轮精度的适度下降被每轮训练时间的减少所抵消,比EmbC更快收敛到 ≈ 3.5 × ,并且比默认的联邦GNN学习提高 ≈ 16%的精度。虽然对于像Arxiv和Papers这样的稀疏图,默认联合gnn的精度改进是适度的,但它们比EmbC更快地实现了 ≈ 11 × 的目标精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
172
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: This international journal is directed to researchers, engineers, educators, managers, programmers, and users of computers who have particular interests in parallel processing and/or distributed computing. The Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing publishes original research papers and timely review articles on the theory, design, evaluation, and use of parallel and/or distributed computing systems. The journal also features special issues on these topics; again covering the full range from the design to the use of our targeted systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书