A novel hypothesis on the pathogenesis of traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Medical hypotheses Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2026.111891
Ning Li , Yumin Heng , Tianyang Lv , Xiaoyue Ge , Changkui Liu , Kaijin Hu
{"title":"A novel hypothesis on the pathogenesis of traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis","authors":"Ning Li ,&nbsp;Yumin Heng ,&nbsp;Tianyang Lv ,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Ge ,&nbsp;Changkui Liu ,&nbsp;Kaijin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2026.111891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TTMJA), with its high recurrence rate post-surgery, lacks a unifying pathogenesis theory, hindering effective prevention. We propose a novel four-stage cascade hypothesis that highlights early lymphatic dysfunction—rather than hematoma organization—as a key early determinant of pathological repair. High-energy trauma releases<!--> <!-->free fibrocartilage fragments into the joint space, where they may act as ’osteogenic seeds’. Subsequent<!--> <!-->mechanical zonation<!--> <!-->of the joint into micromotion and stable zones then drives spatially distinct osteogenic pathways (endochondral and intramembranous ossification), explaining the histopathological heterogeneity of the ankylotic mass. This process culminates in piezoelectric-guided vascular fusion and osteoclast-suppressed consolidation, forming a complete bony bridge. Empirically testable in established models, this hypothesis delineates clear therapeutic windows: early intervention targeting lymphatic repair and debris clearance (≤7 days), followed by mechanical modulation (7–21 days), and late osteoclast reactivation (&gt;60 days). This framework reframes clinical management by advocating stage-specific interventions within defined therapeutic windows to shift from reactive surgery to mechanism-based prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 111891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987726000204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TTMJA), with its high recurrence rate post-surgery, lacks a unifying pathogenesis theory, hindering effective prevention. We propose a novel four-stage cascade hypothesis that highlights early lymphatic dysfunction—rather than hematoma organization—as a key early determinant of pathological repair. High-energy trauma releases free fibrocartilage fragments into the joint space, where they may act as ’osteogenic seeds’. Subsequent mechanical zonation of the joint into micromotion and stable zones then drives spatially distinct osteogenic pathways (endochondral and intramembranous ossification), explaining the histopathological heterogeneity of the ankylotic mass. This process culminates in piezoelectric-guided vascular fusion and osteoclast-suppressed consolidation, forming a complete bony bridge. Empirically testable in established models, this hypothesis delineates clear therapeutic windows: early intervention targeting lymphatic repair and debris clearance (≤7 days), followed by mechanical modulation (7–21 days), and late osteoclast reactivation (>60 days). This framework reframes clinical management by advocating stage-specific interventions within defined therapeutic windows to shift from reactive surgery to mechanism-based prevention.
外伤性颞下颌关节强直发病机制的新假说
外伤性颞下颌关节强直(TTMJA)术后复发率高,发病机制缺乏统一的理论,阻碍了有效的预防。我们提出了一个新的四阶段级联假说,强调早期淋巴功能障碍-而不是血肿组织-是病理修复的关键早期决定因素。高能创伤将游离的纤维软骨碎片释放到关节间隙,在那里它们可能起到“成骨种子”的作用。随后关节的机械区分为微动区和稳定区,然后驱动空间上不同的成骨途径(软骨内和膜内骨化),解释了强直团块的组织病理学异质性。这个过程在压电引导的血管融合和破骨细胞抑制的巩固中达到高潮,形成一个完整的骨桥。在已建立的模型中进行了实证检验,该假设描绘了明确的治疗窗口:针对淋巴修复和碎片清除的早期干预(≤7天),随后进行机械调节(7 - 21天),以及晚期破骨细胞再激活(60天)。该框架通过提倡在确定的治疗窗口内进行阶段特异性干预,从反应性手术转向基于机制的预防,从而重新构建了临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical hypotheses
Medical hypotheses 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
167
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书