Ning Li , Yumin Heng , Tianyang Lv , Xiaoyue Ge , Changkui Liu , Kaijin Hu
{"title":"A novel hypothesis on the pathogenesis of traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis","authors":"Ning Li , Yumin Heng , Tianyang Lv , Xiaoyue Ge , Changkui Liu , Kaijin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2026.111891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TTMJA), with its high recurrence rate post-surgery, lacks a unifying pathogenesis theory, hindering effective prevention. We propose a novel four-stage cascade hypothesis that highlights early lymphatic dysfunction—rather than hematoma organization—as a key early determinant of pathological repair. High-energy trauma releases<!--> <!-->free fibrocartilage fragments into the joint space, where they may act as ’osteogenic seeds’. Subsequent<!--> <!-->mechanical zonation<!--> <!-->of the joint into micromotion and stable zones then drives spatially distinct osteogenic pathways (endochondral and intramembranous ossification), explaining the histopathological heterogeneity of the ankylotic mass. This process culminates in piezoelectric-guided vascular fusion and osteoclast-suppressed consolidation, forming a complete bony bridge. Empirically testable in established models, this hypothesis delineates clear therapeutic windows: early intervention targeting lymphatic repair and debris clearance (≤7 days), followed by mechanical modulation (7–21 days), and late osteoclast reactivation (>60 days). This framework reframes clinical management by advocating stage-specific interventions within defined therapeutic windows to shift from reactive surgery to mechanism-based prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 111891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987726000204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TTMJA), with its high recurrence rate post-surgery, lacks a unifying pathogenesis theory, hindering effective prevention. We propose a novel four-stage cascade hypothesis that highlights early lymphatic dysfunction—rather than hematoma organization—as a key early determinant of pathological repair. High-energy trauma releases free fibrocartilage fragments into the joint space, where they may act as ’osteogenic seeds’. Subsequent mechanical zonation of the joint into micromotion and stable zones then drives spatially distinct osteogenic pathways (endochondral and intramembranous ossification), explaining the histopathological heterogeneity of the ankylotic mass. This process culminates in piezoelectric-guided vascular fusion and osteoclast-suppressed consolidation, forming a complete bony bridge. Empirically testable in established models, this hypothesis delineates clear therapeutic windows: early intervention targeting lymphatic repair and debris clearance (≤7 days), followed by mechanical modulation (7–21 days), and late osteoclast reactivation (>60 days). This framework reframes clinical management by advocating stage-specific interventions within defined therapeutic windows to shift from reactive surgery to mechanism-based prevention.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.