Relative definition of handicap: implications for research.

M Söder
{"title":"Relative definition of handicap: implications for research.","authors":"M Söder","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to a relative definition handicap arises in the relation between an individual (with a weakness, an impairment or a disability) and his/her environment. To identify handicap it is therefore necessary to use environmental criteria as well as individual ones. Several attempts have been made to take a relative definition as a basis for classification and research. These attempts, however, often end up using a traditional clinical perspective by reducing the highly complex environmental circumstances to the ability of the individual to handle those circumstances. This is the case with the terminology and classification schemes proposed by WHO (International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: ICIDH). This is also what seems to have happened with the relative notion of mental retardation, presented 15 years ago in terms of \"a social system perspective\". One of the reasons might be the methodological problems involved in handling the complexity of social environmental factors. To transcend the clinical perspective and take the full consequences of the relative definition social and behavioral research need to focus on the social meaning of handicap as it manifests itself in daily life. This calls for an anthropological approach in studying the everyday lives of mentally retarded persons as well as studies of the role of the professional in labelling those persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":76782,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences. Supplement","volume":"44 ","pages":"24-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to a relative definition handicap arises in the relation between an individual (with a weakness, an impairment or a disability) and his/her environment. To identify handicap it is therefore necessary to use environmental criteria as well as individual ones. Several attempts have been made to take a relative definition as a basis for classification and research. These attempts, however, often end up using a traditional clinical perspective by reducing the highly complex environmental circumstances to the ability of the individual to handle those circumstances. This is the case with the terminology and classification schemes proposed by WHO (International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: ICIDH). This is also what seems to have happened with the relative notion of mental retardation, presented 15 years ago in terms of "a social system perspective". One of the reasons might be the methodological problems involved in handling the complexity of social environmental factors. To transcend the clinical perspective and take the full consequences of the relative definition social and behavioral research need to focus on the social meaning of handicap as it manifests itself in daily life. This calls for an anthropological approach in studying the everyday lives of mentally retarded persons as well as studies of the role of the professional in labelling those persons.

残疾的相对定义:对研究的启示。
根据一个相对的定义,障碍产生于一个人(有弱点、缺陷或残疾)与其环境之间的关系。因此,为了确定残疾,有必要使用环境标准和个人标准。人们曾多次尝试以一个相对的定义作为分类和研究的基础。然而,这些尝试往往最终使用传统的临床观点,将高度复杂的环境环境降低到个人处理这些环境的能力。世卫组织提出的术语和分类方案(国际缺陷、残疾和障碍分类:ICIDH)就是这种情况。这似乎也发生在15年前以“社会系统视角”提出的智力迟钝的相对概念上。其中一个原因可能是在处理复杂的社会环境因素时所涉及的方法问题。为了超越临床视角,充分考虑相关定义的后果,社会和行为研究需要关注残疾在日常生活中表现出来的社会意义。这就需要用人类学的方法来研究智障人士的日常生活,并研究专业人员在给这些人贴上标签方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信