Evaluating Access to Cellphones for Telehealth Among People Experiencing Homelessness.

IF 2
Rudolfo Agustin, Kelli Garber, Grace Barthold, Tina Gustin
{"title":"Evaluating Access to Cellphones for Telehealth Among People Experiencing Homelessness.","authors":"Rudolfo Agustin, Kelli Garber, Grace Barthold, Tina Gustin","doi":"10.1177/15305627261417926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth has expanded access to health care services, yet its effectiveness relies heavily on access to communication technology, particularly cellphones. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face significant barriers to technological access, which may limit their ability to engage in telehealth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This pilot study evaluated cellphone access and barriers to use for telehealth among sheltered and unsheltered PEH at free community clinics in Virginia Beach, Virginia, through an orally administered survey. Differences in the use of telehealth between government-issued cellphone users and nongovernment-issued cellphone users in this population were examined, as well as differences in perceived barriers to cellphone access and telehealth utilization between sheltered PEH and unsheltered PEH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 74 participants, 53% reported being sheltered PEH and 47% were unsheltered. Of the sheltered PEH, 97% reported having a cellphone, whereas only 74% of the unsheltered PEH reported having one. Significant barriers to utilization included the cost of devices (<i>p</i> = 0.013), inability to charge phones (<i>p</i> = 0.048), and a lack of mobile data (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Nongovernment cellphone users were more likely to use their cellphones for audio-only telehealth than government cellphone users. The study findings provide insights but, given sample size, they cannot be generalized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEH may have access to a cellphone; however, utilization for telehealth may be limited due to cost and technological barriers, as well as prioritization of texting and phone calls to preserve data. Overcoming these barriers is crucial to making telehealth an equitable health care tool for PEH.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"508-515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261417926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth has expanded access to health care services, yet its effectiveness relies heavily on access to communication technology, particularly cellphones. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face significant barriers to technological access, which may limit their ability to engage in telehealth.

Materials and methods: This pilot study evaluated cellphone access and barriers to use for telehealth among sheltered and unsheltered PEH at free community clinics in Virginia Beach, Virginia, through an orally administered survey. Differences in the use of telehealth between government-issued cellphone users and nongovernment-issued cellphone users in this population were examined, as well as differences in perceived barriers to cellphone access and telehealth utilization between sheltered PEH and unsheltered PEH.

Results: Of the 74 participants, 53% reported being sheltered PEH and 47% were unsheltered. Of the sheltered PEH, 97% reported having a cellphone, whereas only 74% of the unsheltered PEH reported having one. Significant barriers to utilization included the cost of devices (p = 0.013), inability to charge phones (p = 0.048), and a lack of mobile data (p < 0.001). Nongovernment cellphone users were more likely to use their cellphones for audio-only telehealth than government cellphone users. The study findings provide insights but, given sample size, they cannot be generalized.

Conclusion: PEH may have access to a cellphone; however, utilization for telehealth may be limited due to cost and technological barriers, as well as prioritization of texting and phone calls to preserve data. Overcoming these barriers is crucial to making telehealth an equitable health care tool for PEH.

评估无家可归者使用手机进行远程医疗的情况。
背景:远程保健扩大了获得保健服务的机会,但其有效性在很大程度上依赖于获得通信技术,特别是手机。无家可归者在获得技术方面面临重大障碍,这可能限制他们参与远程保健的能力。材料和方法:本试点研究通过一项口头调查,评估了弗吉尼亚州弗吉尼亚海滩免费社区诊所中庇护和未庇护的PEH使用手机进行远程医疗的障碍。研究了这一人群中政府发放的手机用户和非政府发放的手机用户在远程医疗使用方面的差异,以及受庇护的PEH和未受庇护的PEH在手机接入和远程医疗利用方面的感知障碍的差异。结果:在74名参与者中,53%的人报告有庇护的PEH, 47%的人没有庇护。在受保护的PEH中,97%的人有手机,而在未受保护的PEH中,只有74%的人有手机。使用的主要障碍包括设备成本(p = 0.013)、无法给手机充电(p = 0.048)和缺乏移动数据(p < 0.001)。非政府手机用户比政府手机用户更有可能使用他们的手机进行只有音频的远程医疗。研究结果提供了一些见解,但鉴于样本量,它们不能一概而论。结论:PEH可能有手机;然而,由于成本和技术障碍,以及为保存数据而优先考虑发短信和打电话,远程保健的利用可能受到限制。克服这些障碍对于使远程保健成为PEH的公平保健工具至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书