Evaluation of Clonidine Utilization for Dexmedetomidine Discontinuation in the Intensive Care Unit.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI:10.1177/08850666251415527
Sapna Basappa, Brittany Block, Priya Vallabh
{"title":"Evaluation of Clonidine Utilization for Dexmedetomidine Discontinuation in the Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Sapna Basappa, Brittany Block, Priya Vallabh","doi":"10.1177/08850666251415527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposePrevious studies evaluating clonidine for dexmedetomidine weaning in critically ill patients have shown efficacy but are limited to smaller samples of adult or pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enteral clonidine in the transition from dexmedetomidine for agitation and sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU).Materials and MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to an ICU at UMass Memorial Medical Center between May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023 who received enteral clonidine for the indication of weaning dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was discontinuation of dexmedetomidine within 24 h of starting enteral clonidine. A priori risk factors for the primary outcome included duration of dexmedetomidine prior to clonidine initiation, clonidine total daily dose, average Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, history of a psychiatric disorder, intubation at time of clonidine initiation, and being on additional sedation agents at the time of clonidine initiation. Safety outcomes included the incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, and withdrawal.ResultsSeventy-three patients were included. The primary outcome of dexmedetomidine discontinuation within 24 h occurred in 38 patients (52%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the a priori risk factors indicated that non-intubated patients at the time of clonidine initiation were significantly more likely to achieve the primary outcome (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.04-17.62, p = 0.04). Incidence of bradycardia (5% clonidine vs 16% dexmedetomidine, p = 0.04) and withdrawal (0% vs 49%, p < 0.0001) were higher while patients were on dexmedetomidine.ConclusionsClonidine was efficacious in weaning dexmedetomidine within 24 h in 52% of patients; however, the ideal dose and period for initiation remains unclear. Results of this study warrant further investigation to identify optimal clonidine dosing for dexmedetomidine weaning and to characterize patient populations that would benefit most from this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"883-888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251415527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposePrevious studies evaluating clonidine for dexmedetomidine weaning in critically ill patients have shown efficacy but are limited to smaller samples of adult or pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enteral clonidine in the transition from dexmedetomidine for agitation and sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU).Materials and MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to an ICU at UMass Memorial Medical Center between May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023 who received enteral clonidine for the indication of weaning dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was discontinuation of dexmedetomidine within 24 h of starting enteral clonidine. A priori risk factors for the primary outcome included duration of dexmedetomidine prior to clonidine initiation, clonidine total daily dose, average Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, history of a psychiatric disorder, intubation at time of clonidine initiation, and being on additional sedation agents at the time of clonidine initiation. Safety outcomes included the incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, and withdrawal.ResultsSeventy-three patients were included. The primary outcome of dexmedetomidine discontinuation within 24 h occurred in 38 patients (52%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the a priori risk factors indicated that non-intubated patients at the time of clonidine initiation were significantly more likely to achieve the primary outcome (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.04-17.62, p = 0.04). Incidence of bradycardia (5% clonidine vs 16% dexmedetomidine, p = 0.04) and withdrawal (0% vs 49%, p < 0.0001) were higher while patients were on dexmedetomidine.ConclusionsClonidine was efficacious in weaning dexmedetomidine within 24 h in 52% of patients; however, the ideal dose and period for initiation remains unclear. Results of this study warrant further investigation to identify optimal clonidine dosing for dexmedetomidine weaning and to characterize patient populations that would benefit most from this intervention.

重症监护室右美托咪定停药后可乐定使用的评价。
目的先前的研究评估了可乐定对危重患者右美托咪定断奶的疗效,但仅限于较小样本的成人或儿科患者。本研究的目的是评估肠内可乐定在重症监护病房(ICU)由右美托咪定转换为躁动和镇静的有效性和安全性。材料与方法本研究是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2022年5月1日至2023年4月30日在麻省大学纪念医学中心ICU收治的成年患者,这些患者因断奶右美托咪定的指征而接受肠内可乐定治疗。主要结局是在开始肠内可乐定后24小时内停止使用右美托咪定。主要结局的先验危险因素包括:可乐定起始前右美托咪定的持续时间、可乐定总日剂量、平均里士满激动镇静量表(RASS)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、精神疾病史、可乐定起始时插管、以及在可乐定起始时使用其他镇静药物。安全性指标包括心动过缓、低血压和停药的发生率。结果共纳入73例患者。38例(52%)患者出现24小时内右美托咪定停药的主要结局。对先验危险因素进行多变量logistic回归分析显示,开始使用可乐定时未插管的患者更有可能达到主要结局(OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.04 ~ 17.62, p = 0.04)。心动过缓的发生率(可乐定5% vs右美托咪定16%,p = 0.04)和戒断(0% vs 49%, p = 0.04)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书