Design and implementation of data collection and linkage of electronic health records in a large UK cluster-randomised trial of asthma management (ARRISA-UK)

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2026.108242
Polly-Anna Ashford , Stanley Musgrave , Allan B. Clark , Susan Stirling , Martin Pond , David Price , Francis Appiagyei , Estelle Payerne , Jane R. Smith , Michael Noble , Andrew M. Wilson
{"title":"Design and implementation of data collection and linkage of electronic health records in a large UK cluster-randomised trial of asthma management (ARRISA-UK)","authors":"Polly-Anna Ashford ,&nbsp;Stanley Musgrave ,&nbsp;Allan B. Clark ,&nbsp;Susan Stirling ,&nbsp;Martin Pond ,&nbsp;David Price ,&nbsp;Francis Appiagyei ,&nbsp;Estelle Payerne ,&nbsp;Jane R. Smith ,&nbsp;Michael Noble ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2026.108242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electronic health record data holds great potential for conducting large, efficient randomised controlled trials. Despite progress towards greater availability of linked NHS datasets, the use of routine clinical data remains challenging for trialists. In this paper we describe the design, adaptations and implementation of methods for data collection and linkage in ARRISA-UK: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a complex asthma management intervention involving 275 primary care practices across England, Wales and Scotland.</div><div>Our methods were designed to build a dataset of linked primary care and secondary care data for approximately 10,000 ‘at-risk’ asthma patients to measure the trial's primary outcome (asthma crisis events comprising respiratory-related hospital admissions, emergency department attendances and/or death for ‘at-risk’ asthma patients) and secondary clinical outcomes including the impact of the intervention on ∼180,000 asthma patients at participating practices.</div><div>A high level of practice attrition (33%) was observed due to data extraction delays and technical barriers, patient identification errors, and concerns about the processing of patient identifiable data for the purpose of record linkage. We highlight the technical achievements, barriers and lessons learned from ARRISA-UK and propose recommendations to facilitate future data-enabled trials, including greater resourcing in recognition of their complex nature, improved systems of support and training in primary care, and the need to maintain and improve clinician and public trust in research data use for long term sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714426000285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic health record data holds great potential for conducting large, efficient randomised controlled trials. Despite progress towards greater availability of linked NHS datasets, the use of routine clinical data remains challenging for trialists. In this paper we describe the design, adaptations and implementation of methods for data collection and linkage in ARRISA-UK: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a complex asthma management intervention involving 275 primary care practices across England, Wales and Scotland.
Our methods were designed to build a dataset of linked primary care and secondary care data for approximately 10,000 ‘at-risk’ asthma patients to measure the trial's primary outcome (asthma crisis events comprising respiratory-related hospital admissions, emergency department attendances and/or death for ‘at-risk’ asthma patients) and secondary clinical outcomes including the impact of the intervention on ∼180,000 asthma patients at participating practices.
A high level of practice attrition (33%) was observed due to data extraction delays and technical barriers, patient identification errors, and concerns about the processing of patient identifiable data for the purpose of record linkage. We highlight the technical achievements, barriers and lessons learned from ARRISA-UK and propose recommendations to facilitate future data-enabled trials, including greater resourcing in recognition of their complex nature, improved systems of support and training in primary care, and the need to maintain and improve clinician and public trust in research data use for long term sustainability.
英国哮喘管理的一项大型集群随机试验(ARRISA-UK)中数据收集和电子健康记录链接的设计和实施
电子健康记录数据在进行大规模、高效的随机对照试验方面具有巨大潜力。尽管在提高NHS数据集的可用性方面取得了进展,但常规临床数据的使用对试验人员来说仍然具有挑战性。在本文中,我们描述了ARRISA-UK中数据收集和联系方法的设计、调整和实施:ARRISA-UK是一项复杂哮喘管理干预的随机对照试验,涉及英格兰、威尔士和苏格兰的275个初级保健实践。我们的方法旨在为大约10,000名“高危”哮喘患者建立一个关联的初级保健和二级保健数据集,以测量试验的主要结果(哮喘危机事件,包括呼吸相关的住院率、急诊科就诊率和/或“高危”哮喘患者的死亡)和次要临床结果,包括干预对参与实践的约180,000名哮喘患者的影响。由于数据提取延迟和技术障碍、患者识别错误以及出于记录链接目的对患者可识别数据的处理的担忧,观察到高水平的执业人员流失(33%)。我们强调了从ARRISA-UK获得的技术成就、障碍和经验教训,并提出了促进未来数据支持试验的建议,包括承认其复杂性的更多资源,改进初级保健支持和培训系统,以及维护和提高临床医生和公众对长期可持续性研究数据使用的信任的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书