Toward an International Consensus on a Social Return on Investment Model of Recreational Physical Activity and Sport Participation: A Delphi Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of physical activity & health Pub Date : 2026-01-22 Print Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1123/jpah.2025-0362
Inés Nieto, Xián Mayo, Larissa Davies, Lindsey J Reece, Ben Strafford, Alfonso Jimenez
{"title":"Toward an International Consensus on a Social Return on Investment Model of Recreational Physical Activity and Sport Participation: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Inés Nieto, Xián Mayo, Larissa Davies, Lindsey J Reece, Ben Strafford, Alfonso Jimenez","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2025-0362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Investment in recreational physical activity and sports participation (PAS) needs to be justified. The Social Return on Investment (SROI) is a framework that aims to quantify social value, but there is no standard on how to apply it to the PAS sector. This study uses the Delphi method to reach international consensus on (1) the definition of social value of PAS, (2) the social outcomes that should be measured, and (3) the tools to measure and value them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The preparing phase included a systematic review, initial interviews, and 2 creative workshops. During the conducting phase, a pilot was followed by 3 iterative rounds of communication with experts. Participants indicated their level of agreement with different statements. Consensus was reached if ≥70% of the panel agreed or disagreed. Small expert meetings were used as an additional step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine experts completed the first round and consensus was reached in all statements. There was 100% of agreement that Health, Education, Subjective Well-being, and Social Capital should be outcomes of a Social Return on Investment model of PAS and 85.7% for Crime. However, the results from the small expert meetings led to the removal of Social Capital and Crime from the final model. Stability of consensus (≤10% variability) was reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides the initial phase for a standardized international PAS Social Return on Investment model to guide policymakers, industry, and any stakeholder interested in the evaluation of the social value generated by their activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"699-717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Investment in recreational physical activity and sports participation (PAS) needs to be justified. The Social Return on Investment (SROI) is a framework that aims to quantify social value, but there is no standard on how to apply it to the PAS sector. This study uses the Delphi method to reach international consensus on (1) the definition of social value of PAS, (2) the social outcomes that should be measured, and (3) the tools to measure and value them.

Methods: The preparing phase included a systematic review, initial interviews, and 2 creative workshops. During the conducting phase, a pilot was followed by 3 iterative rounds of communication with experts. Participants indicated their level of agreement with different statements. Consensus was reached if ≥70% of the panel agreed or disagreed. Small expert meetings were used as an additional step.

Results: Fifty-nine experts completed the first round and consensus was reached in all statements. There was 100% of agreement that Health, Education, Subjective Well-being, and Social Capital should be outcomes of a Social Return on Investment model of PAS and 85.7% for Crime. However, the results from the small expert meetings led to the removal of Social Capital and Crime from the final model. Stability of consensus (≤10% variability) was reached.

Conclusions: This study provides the initial phase for a standardized international PAS Social Return on Investment model to guide policymakers, industry, and any stakeholder interested in the evaluation of the social value generated by their activity.

休闲体育活动与体育参与社会投资回报模型的国际共识:德尔菲研究。
背景:对娱乐性体育活动和体育参与(PAS)的投资需要被证明是合理的。社会投资回报率(SROI)是一个旨在量化社会价值的框架,但如何将其应用于PAS部门尚无标准。本研究采用德尔菲法,对PAS社会价值的定义、应测量的社会结果以及测量和评估社会结果的工具达成国际共识。方法:准备阶段包括系统回顾、初步访谈和2次创意研讨会。在实施阶段,试点之后是与专家进行三轮反复沟通。参与者表明了他们对不同说法的同意程度。如果≥70%的专家组成员同意或不同意,则达成共识。小型专家会议是另一个步骤。结果:59位专家完成了第一轮评议,所有评议意见均达成共识。100%的人同意健康、教育、主观幸福感和社会资本应该是PAS的社会投资回报模型的结果,85.7%的人同意犯罪。然而,小型专家会议的结果导致从最终模型中删除了社会资本和犯罪。一致性达到了稳定性(≤10%的变异性)。结论:本研究为标准化的国际PAS社会投资回报模型提供了初始阶段,以指导政策制定者、行业和任何对评估其活动产生的社会价值感兴趣的利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书