Sex differences in mortality and functional outcomes across stroke subtype: A nationwide cohort study.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
International Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-22 DOI:10.1177/17474930261419672
Tae Jung Kim, Ji Sung Lee, Jun Yup Kim, Do Yeon Kim, Yong Soo Kim, Dong-Wan Kang, Jihoon Kang, Beom Joon Kim, Seong-Eun Kim, Jong-Moo Park, Kyungbok Lee, Jeong-Yoon Lee, Yong-Jin Cho, Han-Yeong Jeong, Han-Gil Jeong, Byeolnim Ban, Mi Sun Oh, Soo Joo Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Yong Uk Kwon, Yu Ra Lee, Yu Jeong Lim, Philip B Gorelick, Hee-Joon Bae
{"title":"Sex differences in mortality and functional outcomes across stroke subtype: A nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Tae Jung Kim, Ji Sung Lee, Jun Yup Kim, Do Yeon Kim, Yong Soo Kim, Dong-Wan Kang, Jihoon Kang, Beom Joon Kim, Seong-Eun Kim, Jong-Moo Park, Kyungbok Lee, Jeong-Yoon Lee, Yong-Jin Cho, Han-Yeong Jeong, Han-Gil Jeong, Byeolnim Ban, Mi Sun Oh, Soo Joo Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Yong Uk Kwon, Yu Ra Lee, Yu Jeong Lim, Philip B Gorelick, Hee-Joon Bae","doi":"10.1177/17474930261419672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex disparities in stroke outcomes are well-recognized, but it remains unclear whether these disparities vary across stroke subtypes and how they relate to differences in acute care delivery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to examine sex differences in long-term mortality, functional outcomes, and acute stroke management across stroke subtypes using a nationwide population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed linked clinical audit and claims data from 58,429 patients with acute stroke admitted to 269 hospitals in South Korea between 2018 and 2021. Clinical data were derived from the national Acute Stroke Quality Assessment Program and linked to claims. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was poor functional outcome at discharge. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between sex and outcomes, stratified by stroke subtype and adjusted for age, stroke severity, and comorbidities. Differences in acute stroke care were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58,429 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [13.8] years; 43.9% female), 76.1% had ischemic stroke (IS), 15.7% intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and 8.2% subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Females were older than males across all subtypes and had different comorbidity profiles. After adjustment, females had significantly lower mortality in all subtypes (adjusted hazard ratios [95% CI]: IS, 0.77 [0.74-0.80]; ICH, 0.60 [0.56-0.64]; SAH, 0.60 [0.54-0.67]; all P < 0.001). Functional outcomes varied: females had worse outcomes in IS, better in ICH, and no difference in SAH. Males were more likely to receive reperfusion and surgical therapies; females were more likely to receive rehabilitation services. These care differences did not fully explain the observed disparities in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this national cohort, sex disparities in stroke outcomes differed by subtype. Despite lower adjusted mortality in females, functional outcomes were not uniformly better. These findings underscore the importance of adopting sex- and subtype-specific approaches to stroke care, secondary prevention, and rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"1030-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930261419672","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sex disparities in stroke outcomes are well-recognized, but it remains unclear whether these disparities vary across stroke subtypes and how they relate to differences in acute care delivery.

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine sex differences in long-term mortality, functional outcomes, and acute stroke management across stroke subtypes using a nationwide population-based cohort.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed linked clinical audit and claims data from 58,429 patients with acute stroke admitted to 269 hospitals in South Korea between 2018 and 2021. Clinical data were derived from the national Acute Stroke Quality Assessment Program and linked to claims. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was poor functional outcome at discharge. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between sex and outcomes, stratified by stroke subtype and adjusted for age, stroke severity, and comorbidities. Differences in acute stroke care were also analyzed.

Results: Of 58,429 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [13.8] years; 43.9% female), 76.1% had ischemic stroke (IS), 15.7% intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and 8.2% subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Females were older than males across all subtypes and had different comorbidity profiles. After adjustment, females had significantly lower mortality in all subtypes (adjusted hazard ratios [95% CI]: IS, 0.77 [0.74-0.80]; ICH, 0.60 [0.56-0.64]; SAH, 0.60 [0.54-0.67]; all P < 0.001). Functional outcomes varied: females had worse outcomes in IS, better in ICH, and no difference in SAH. Males were more likely to receive reperfusion and surgical therapies; females were more likely to receive rehabilitation services. These care differences did not fully explain the observed disparities in outcomes.

Conclusion: In this national cohort, sex disparities in stroke outcomes differed by subtype. Despite lower adjusted mortality in females, functional outcomes were not uniformly better. These findings underscore the importance of adopting sex- and subtype-specific approaches to stroke care, secondary prevention, and rehabilitation.

卒中亚型死亡率和功能结局的性别差异:一项全国性队列研究。
背景:卒中结局的性别差异是公认的,但这些差异是否在卒中亚型之间有所不同以及它们与急性护理交付的差异之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:通过一项基于全国人口的队列研究,研究卒中亚型在长期死亡率、功能结局和急性卒中管理方面的性别差异。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2018年至2021年间韩国269家医院收治的58,429例急性中风患者的相关临床审计和索赔数据。临床数据来源于国家急性卒中质量评估项目,并与索赔相关联。主要结局为全因死亡率。次要结局是出院时功能预后差。使用多变量Cox和logistic回归模型来评估性别与结果之间的关系,并按卒中亚型分层,并根据年龄、卒中严重程度和合并症进行调整。急性脑卒中护理的差异也进行了分析。结果:58,429例患者(平均[SD]年龄68.6[13.8]岁,43.9%为女性)中,76.1%为IS, 15.7%为ICH, 8.2%为SAH。在所有亚型中,女性比男性年龄大,并具有不同的合并症概况。校正后,女性在所有亚型中的死亡率均显著降低(校正后的危险比[95% CI]: IS, 0.77 [0.74-0.80]; ICH, 0.60 [0.56-0.64]; SAH, 0.60[0.54-0.67],均P < 0.001)。功能结果各不相同:女性在IS中预后较差,在ICH中较好,在SAH中无差异。男性更有可能接受再灌注和手术治疗;女性更有可能接受康复服务。这些护理差异并不能完全解释观察到的结果差异。结论:在这个国家队列中,脑卒中预后的性别差异因亚型而异。尽管女性的调整死亡率较低,但功能结果并非都更好。这些发现强调了在卒中护理、二级预防和康复中采用性别和亚型特异性方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书