The role of general practitioners in dementia diagnosis: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mary Cronin, Aisling Jennings, Nicola Cornally, Irene Hartigan, Séan O'Dowd, Marieke Perry, Suzanne Timmons, Kieran Walsh, Tony Foley
{"title":"The role of general practitioners in dementia diagnosis: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.","authors":"Mary Cronin, Aisling Jennings, Nicola Cornally, Irene Hartigan, Séan O'Dowd, Marieke Perry, Suzanne Timmons, Kieran Walsh, Tony Foley","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely diagnosis of dementia is a public health priority, with general practitioners (GPs) central to symptom recognition and assessment. The emergence of biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies makes accurate, timely diagnosis more critical than ever, introducing new complexities for general practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are vital tools to support clinical decision-making, but their applicability to the general practice setting is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review analyses how international CPGs define and support the GP's role in the dementia diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework, five electronic databases and multiple grey literature sources were searched for dementia CPGs published between 2019 and 2025. Guideline quality was assessed using selected domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument (AGREE II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen CPGs from a range of healthcare systems were included. Only two were specifically developed for general practice. While most CPGs positioned GPs as key to timely diagnosis, the recommendations were predominantly developed from a secondary-care perspective and failed to address the fundamental barrier of limited consultation time. Furthermore, practical guidance for GPs on integrating new biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies was almost absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A disconnect exists between CPG recommendations and the realities of general practice, rendering much of the guidance aspirational rather than actionable. To be effective, future guidelines must ensure recommendations are feasible, address resource constraints, and establish clear pathways for the new biological era of dementia care. Without this, general practice will remain ill-equipped to meet the growing challenges of dementia diagnosis and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of dementia is a public health priority, with general practitioners (GPs) central to symptom recognition and assessment. The emergence of biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies makes accurate, timely diagnosis more critical than ever, introducing new complexities for general practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are vital tools to support clinical decision-making, but their applicability to the general practice setting is uncertain.

Objectives: This scoping review analyses how international CPGs define and support the GP's role in the dementia diagnostic process.

Methods: Following the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework, five electronic databases and multiple grey literature sources were searched for dementia CPGs published between 2019 and 2025. Guideline quality was assessed using selected domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument (AGREE II).

Results: Fifteen CPGs from a range of healthcare systems were included. Only two were specifically developed for general practice. While most CPGs positioned GPs as key to timely diagnosis, the recommendations were predominantly developed from a secondary-care perspective and failed to address the fundamental barrier of limited consultation time. Furthermore, practical guidance for GPs on integrating new biomarkers and anti-amyloid therapies was almost absent.

Conclusions: A disconnect exists between CPG recommendations and the realities of general practice, rendering much of the guidance aspirational rather than actionable. To be effective, future guidelines must ensure recommendations are feasible, address resource constraints, and establish clear pathways for the new biological era of dementia care. Without this, general practice will remain ill-equipped to meet the growing challenges of dementia diagnosis and management.

Abstract Image

全科医生在痴呆诊断中的作用:临床实践指南的范围审查。
背景:及时诊断痴呆是公共卫生的优先事项,全科医生(gp)是症状识别和评估的中心。生物标志物和抗淀粉样蛋白疗法的出现使得准确、及时的诊断比以往任何时候都更加重要,这给全科实践带来了新的复杂性。临床实践指南(CPGs)是支持临床决策的重要工具,但其对一般实践环境的适用性尚不确定。目的:本综述分析国际CPGs如何定义和支持全科医生在痴呆诊断过程中的作用。方法:按照Arksey和O'Malley的范围综述框架,检索5个电子数据库和多个灰色文献来源,检索2019年至2025年间发表的痴呆CPGs。使用研究与评估指南II评估工具(AGREE II)的选定领域对指南质量进行评估。结果:包括来自一系列医疗保健系统的15个cpg。只有两个是专门为一般实践开发的。虽然大多数CPGs将全科医生定位为及时诊断的关键,但这些建议主要是从二级保健角度制定的,未能解决咨询时间有限的根本障碍。此外,对全科医生整合新的生物标志物和抗淀粉样蛋白疗法的实用指导几乎缺失。结论:CPG的建议与一般实践的现实之间存在脱节,使得许多指导都是空想而非可操作的。为了有效,未来的指南必须确保建议是可行的,解决资源限制,并为痴呆症护理的新生物学时代建立明确的途径。如果没有这一点,一般实践将仍然无法满足痴呆症诊断和管理日益增长的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书