Anticipatory guidance for parents following paediatric intensive care: a scoping review and environmental scan of recovery-focused resources

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104332
Leigh Dunn , Suzanne Williams , Debbie Long
{"title":"Anticipatory guidance for parents following paediatric intensive care: a scoping review and environmental scan of recovery-focused resources","authors":"Leigh Dunn ,&nbsp;Suzanne Williams ,&nbsp;Debbie Long","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To map and critically appraise anticipatory guidance interventions and resources for parents following PICU discharge, examine how they address recovery challenges, and identify gaps to inform parent-centred resource development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Database search across EBSCO (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies published January 2000-June 2025. Environmental scan via targeted and Google searches. Five tools assessed delivery, understandability, actionability, quality, and readability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1752 records, four studies and nine digital resources met inclusion criteria (n = 271 parents). Formats included phone calls, brochures, in-person conversations, plus websites, webpages, downloadable content, and videos, from university children’s hospitals (n = 10), and organisations (n = 3) across the US (n = 9), UK (n = 3), and Australia (n = 1). Three key findings emerged: (1) support for how parents’ access, understand, and use information was inconsistent; (2) resources prioritised functional (reading/comprehension), over interactive (communication, application) or critical health literacy (evaluation, advocacy); (3) system-level health literacy strategies were limited.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is an urgent need to strengthen anticipatory guidance by embedding health literacy principles across design and delivery. This includes addressing organisational barriers to access and equity through co-design, plain language, and culturally responsive approaches. Beyond information provision, a deliberate focus on capability building can empower parents as active partners in care, ultimately improving outcomes for children and families.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>Anticipatory guidance following PICU discharge must move beyond information provision toward capacity building that supports parents to apply, evaluate, and act on information. Embedding health literacy principles − plain language, readability testing, co-design, and cultural responsiveness − into resource development is critical to ensure accessibility and equity. Clinician education and integration into routine workflows are equally important to optimise resource impact. A universal precautions approach offers a practical strategy for health services to ensure all families, regardless of literacy level, receive clear, actionable, and supportive guidance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 104332"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725003945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To map and critically appraise anticipatory guidance interventions and resources for parents following PICU discharge, examine how they address recovery challenges, and identify gaps to inform parent-centred resource development.

Methods

Database search across EBSCO (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies published January 2000-June 2025. Environmental scan via targeted and Google searches. Five tools assessed delivery, understandability, actionability, quality, and readability.

Results

Of 1752 records, four studies and nine digital resources met inclusion criteria (n = 271 parents). Formats included phone calls, brochures, in-person conversations, plus websites, webpages, downloadable content, and videos, from university children’s hospitals (n = 10), and organisations (n = 3) across the US (n = 9), UK (n = 3), and Australia (n = 1). Three key findings emerged: (1) support for how parents’ access, understand, and use information was inconsistent; (2) resources prioritised functional (reading/comprehension), over interactive (communication, application) or critical health literacy (evaluation, advocacy); (3) system-level health literacy strategies were limited.

Conclusion

There is an urgent need to strengthen anticipatory guidance by embedding health literacy principles across design and delivery. This includes addressing organisational barriers to access and equity through co-design, plain language, and culturally responsive approaches. Beyond information provision, a deliberate focus on capability building can empower parents as active partners in care, ultimately improving outcomes for children and families.

Implications for clinical practice

Anticipatory guidance following PICU discharge must move beyond information provision toward capacity building that supports parents to apply, evaluate, and act on information. Embedding health literacy principles − plain language, readability testing, co-design, and cultural responsiveness − into resource development is critical to ensure accessibility and equity. Clinician education and integration into routine workflows are equally important to optimise resource impact. A universal precautions approach offers a practical strategy for health services to ensure all families, regardless of literacy level, receive clear, actionable, and supportive guidance.
对儿童重症监护后父母的预期指导:以恢复为重点的资源的范围审查和环境扫描。
目的:绘制和批判性评估PICU出院后父母的预期指导干预措施和资源,检查它们如何应对康复挑战,并确定差距,为以父母为中心的资源开发提供信息。方法:检索EBSCO (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,检索2000年1月至2025年6月发表的研究。环境扫描通过目标和谷歌搜索。五个工具评估交付、可理解性、可操作性、质量和可读性。结果:在1752份记录中,有4项研究和9个数字资源符合纳入标准(n = 271名家长)。格式包括电话、宣传册、面对面谈话、网站、网页、可下载内容和视频,来自美国(n = 9)、英国(n = 3)和澳大利亚(n = 1)的大学儿童医院(n = 10)和组织(n = 3)。主要发现有三个:(1)支持家长获取、理解和使用信息的方式不一致;(2)资源优先于功能性(阅读/理解),而不是互动性(沟通、应用)或关键的健康素养(评估、倡导);(3)系统级卫生素养战略有限。结论:迫切需要通过在设计和交付过程中嵌入卫生素养原则来加强预期指导。这包括通过共同设计、通俗易懂的语言和文化响应方法来解决组织在获取和公平方面的障碍。除了提供信息之外,刻意注重能力建设可以使父母成为护理的积极伙伴,最终改善儿童和家庭的结果。对临床实践的启示:PICU出院后的预期指导必须从信息提供转向能力建设,支持家长应用、评估和根据信息采取行动。将卫生扫盲原则——通俗易懂的语言、可读性测试、共同设计和文化响应性——纳入资源开发,对于确保可及性和公平性至关重要。临床医生教育和融入日常工作流程对于优化资源影响同样重要。普遍预防措施为卫生服务提供了一项切实可行的战略,以确保所有家庭,无论其文化水平如何,都能获得明确、可操作和支持性的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书