The Association Between Intensive Parenting Attitudes and Topical Fluoride Opposition

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of public health dentistry Pub Date : 2026-03-09 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI:10.1111/jphd.70033
Alice Ko, Adam C. Carle, Thomas S. Tanbonliong, Donald L. Chi
{"title":"The Association Between Intensive Parenting Attitudes and Topical Fluoride Opposition","authors":"Alice Ko,&nbsp;Adam C. Carle,&nbsp;Thomas S. Tanbonliong,&nbsp;Donald L. Chi","doi":"10.1111/jphd.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study's goal was to investigate the association between intensive parenting attitudes and topical fluoride opposition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a secondary analysis of data on caregivers' beliefs about fluoride for their children. An 85-item survey was administered from November 2020 to September 2021 (<i>N</i> = 1135). Participants were eligible if they were an English-speaking caregiver of a child under 18 years. The outcome variable was topical fluoride opposition, defined as how opposed the caregiver was to topical fluoride for their child (self-reported scale of 0–10). The explanatory variable was intensive parenting attitudes, defined as the extent of child-centered, time-intensive, and self-sacrificing parenting, measured through a composite score from three survey items. Linear regression was used to test the study hypothesis, adjusting for confounders. All analyses were performed in SPSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean ± SD caregiver age was 41.7 ± 8.8 years, with most caregivers being women (73.0%), White (55.5%), non-Hispanic (79.3%), having greater than a 4-year degree (28.5%), and having private dental insurance (45.1%). The mean ± SD topical fluoride opposition score was 2.0 ± 3.1, and the mean ± SD intensive parenting attitudes score was 1.7 ± 0.4. After adjusting for confounders, a 1-point increase in intensive parenting attitudes score was associated with a 0.3-point increase in topical fluoride opposition score (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Intensive parenting attitudes were significantly and positively associated with topical fluoride opposition. Clinicians can utilize these findings to assess caregivers' intensive parenting attitudes, learn about concerns, and address them by tailoring communication strategies to discuss appropriate risk-based recommendations about topical fluoride.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"86 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study's goal was to investigate the association between intensive parenting attitudes and topical fluoride opposition.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of data on caregivers' beliefs about fluoride for their children. An 85-item survey was administered from November 2020 to September 2021 (N = 1135). Participants were eligible if they were an English-speaking caregiver of a child under 18 years. The outcome variable was topical fluoride opposition, defined as how opposed the caregiver was to topical fluoride for their child (self-reported scale of 0–10). The explanatory variable was intensive parenting attitudes, defined as the extent of child-centered, time-intensive, and self-sacrificing parenting, measured through a composite score from three survey items. Linear regression was used to test the study hypothesis, adjusting for confounders. All analyses were performed in SPSS.

Results

The mean ± SD caregiver age was 41.7 ± 8.8 years, with most caregivers being women (73.0%), White (55.5%), non-Hispanic (79.3%), having greater than a 4-year degree (28.5%), and having private dental insurance (45.1%). The mean ± SD topical fluoride opposition score was 2.0 ± 3.1, and the mean ± SD intensive parenting attitudes score was 1.7 ± 0.4. After adjusting for confounders, a 1-point increase in intensive parenting attitudes score was associated with a 0.3-point increase in topical fluoride opposition score (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intensive parenting attitudes were significantly and positively associated with topical fluoride opposition. Clinicians can utilize these findings to assess caregivers' intensive parenting attitudes, learn about concerns, and address them by tailoring communication strategies to discuss appropriate risk-based recommendations about topical fluoride.

强化育儿态度与局部氟化物反对之间的关系。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨强化育儿态度与局部氟化物反对之间的关系。方法:这是对护理人员对儿童氟化物的看法的数据的二次分析。于2020年11月至2021年9月进行85项调查(N = 1135)。如果他们是一个说英语的18岁以下儿童的照顾者,他们就有资格。结果变量是局部氟化物反对,定义为照顾者对其孩子局部氟化物的反对程度(自报告0-10分)。解释变量是强化育儿态度,定义为以孩子为中心、时间密集和自我牺牲的育儿程度,通过三个调查项目的综合得分来衡量。线性回归用于检验研究假设,调整混杂因素。所有分析均在SPSS中进行。结果:护理人员的平均±SD年龄为41.7±8.8岁,以女性(73.0%)、白人(55.5%)、非西班牙裔(79.3%)、4年制以上学历(28.5%)和有私人牙科保险(45.1%)为主。平均±SD局部氟化物反对得分为2.0±3.1,平均±SD强化育儿态度得分为1.7±0.4。在调整混杂因素后,强化育儿态度得分每增加1分,局部氟化物反对得分就会增加0.3分(95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; p)。结论:强化育儿态度与局部氟化物反对显著正相关。临床医生可以利用这些发现来评估护理人员的强化育儿态度,了解他们的担忧,并通过定制沟通策略来解决这些问题,以讨论适当的基于风险的局部氟化物建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of public health dentistry
Journal of public health dentistry 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书