Alice Ko, Adam C. Carle, Thomas S. Tanbonliong, Donald L. Chi
{"title":"The Association Between Intensive Parenting Attitudes and Topical Fluoride Opposition","authors":"Alice Ko, Adam C. Carle, Thomas S. Tanbonliong, Donald L. Chi","doi":"10.1111/jphd.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study's goal was to investigate the association between intensive parenting attitudes and topical fluoride opposition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a secondary analysis of data on caregivers' beliefs about fluoride for their children. An 85-item survey was administered from November 2020 to September 2021 (<i>N</i> = 1135). Participants were eligible if they were an English-speaking caregiver of a child under 18 years. The outcome variable was topical fluoride opposition, defined as how opposed the caregiver was to topical fluoride for their child (self-reported scale of 0–10). The explanatory variable was intensive parenting attitudes, defined as the extent of child-centered, time-intensive, and self-sacrificing parenting, measured through a composite score from three survey items. Linear regression was used to test the study hypothesis, adjusting for confounders. All analyses were performed in SPSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean ± SD caregiver age was 41.7 ± 8.8 years, with most caregivers being women (73.0%), White (55.5%), non-Hispanic (79.3%), having greater than a 4-year degree (28.5%), and having private dental insurance (45.1%). The mean ± SD topical fluoride opposition score was 2.0 ± 3.1, and the mean ± SD intensive parenting attitudes score was 1.7 ± 0.4. After adjusting for confounders, a 1-point increase in intensive parenting attitudes score was associated with a 0.3-point increase in topical fluoride opposition score (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Intensive parenting attitudes were significantly and positively associated with topical fluoride opposition. Clinicians can utilize these findings to assess caregivers' intensive parenting attitudes, learn about concerns, and address them by tailoring communication strategies to discuss appropriate risk-based recommendations about topical fluoride.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"86 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study's goal was to investigate the association between intensive parenting attitudes and topical fluoride opposition.
Methods
This was a secondary analysis of data on caregivers' beliefs about fluoride for their children. An 85-item survey was administered from November 2020 to September 2021 (N = 1135). Participants were eligible if they were an English-speaking caregiver of a child under 18 years. The outcome variable was topical fluoride opposition, defined as how opposed the caregiver was to topical fluoride for their child (self-reported scale of 0–10). The explanatory variable was intensive parenting attitudes, defined as the extent of child-centered, time-intensive, and self-sacrificing parenting, measured through a composite score from three survey items. Linear regression was used to test the study hypothesis, adjusting for confounders. All analyses were performed in SPSS.
Results
The mean ± SD caregiver age was 41.7 ± 8.8 years, with most caregivers being women (73.0%), White (55.5%), non-Hispanic (79.3%), having greater than a 4-year degree (28.5%), and having private dental insurance (45.1%). The mean ± SD topical fluoride opposition score was 2.0 ± 3.1, and the mean ± SD intensive parenting attitudes score was 1.7 ± 0.4. After adjusting for confounders, a 1-point increase in intensive parenting attitudes score was associated with a 0.3-point increase in topical fluoride opposition score (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Intensive parenting attitudes were significantly and positively associated with topical fluoride opposition. Clinicians can utilize these findings to assess caregivers' intensive parenting attitudes, learn about concerns, and address them by tailoring communication strategies to discuss appropriate risk-based recommendations about topical fluoride.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.