Early enteral nutritional support and clinical outcomes in critically ill children: A scoping review

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2026.104336
Marina Maffeo , Gabriele Caggianelli , Emanuele Buccione , Valentina Vanzi , Daniele Ciofi , Mirco Gregorini , Maurizio Zega , Jacopo Fiorini
{"title":"Early enteral nutritional support and clinical outcomes in critically ill children: A scoping review","authors":"Marina Maffeo ,&nbsp;Gabriele Caggianelli ,&nbsp;Emanuele Buccione ,&nbsp;Valentina Vanzi ,&nbsp;Daniele Ciofi ,&nbsp;Mirco Gregorini ,&nbsp;Maurizio Zega ,&nbsp;Jacopo Fiorini","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2026.104336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Pediatric malnutrition, is defined as an imbalance between nutrient intake and requirements leading to cumulative energy, protein, or micronutrient deficits, is highly prevalent among critically ill children and negatively affects growth and recovery. Early enteral nutrition (EEN) is increasingly recognized as a key strategy to prevent or address malnutrition in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Although emerging evidence suggests that EEN improves clinical outcomes, uncertainty persists regarding its feasibility and impact in this population. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence on the use of EEN in critically ill children, evaluate its effects on key clinical outcomes including mechanical ventilation duration, length of stay, and infection risk; and identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation in pediatric intensive care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were eligible if they involved children aged 1 month to 18 years and initiated enteral nutrition within 48 h of PICU admission. Keywords included child, critical illness, enteral nutrition, intensive care units, and pediatrics. Studies in English or Italian were included without date restrictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen thousand seven hundred ninety-nine records were identified; 15,556 were screened after duplicates were removed, and 14 studies met inclusion criteria (USA n = 6; Asia n = 4; Africa n = 3; Europe n = 1). Most were cohort studies, with one randomized trial. EEN was consistently associated with shorter mechanical ventilation duration (5.86 ± 3.63 vs 11.96 ± 9.17 days, p = 0.002), reduced PICU and hospital length of stay (4 vs 11.5 days, p &lt; 0.001), and lower infection rates (16.7 % vs 41.1 %, p = 0.001). Barriers to EEN included hemodynamic instability, gastrointestinal intolerance, and procedural interruptions, while facilitators included multidisciplinary teamwork, nurse-led feeding protocols, and standardized nutritional guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>EEN initiated within 24–48 h was generally associated with favorable clinical outcomes; however, evidence on feasibility and safety remains limited and heterogeneous. Strengthening nursing autonomy and implementing standardized feeding pathways may enhance timely nutrition delivery and support recovery in pediatric intensive care.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>Pediatric intensive care nurses play a pivotal role in initiating and monitoring EEN. Empowering nurses through evidence-based feeding protocols and multidisciplinary education can promote timely nutrition delivery and improve recovery in critically ill children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 104336"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339726000042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Pediatric malnutrition, is defined as an imbalance between nutrient intake and requirements leading to cumulative energy, protein, or micronutrient deficits, is highly prevalent among critically ill children and negatively affects growth and recovery. Early enteral nutrition (EEN) is increasingly recognized as a key strategy to prevent or address malnutrition in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Although emerging evidence suggests that EEN improves clinical outcomes, uncertainty persists regarding its feasibility and impact in this population. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence on the use of EEN in critically ill children, evaluate its effects on key clinical outcomes including mechanical ventilation duration, length of stay, and infection risk; and identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation in pediatric intensive care settings.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were eligible if they involved children aged 1 month to 18 years and initiated enteral nutrition within 48 h of PICU admission. Keywords included child, critical illness, enteral nutrition, intensive care units, and pediatrics. Studies in English or Italian were included without date restrictions.

Results

Sixteen thousand seven hundred ninety-nine records were identified; 15,556 were screened after duplicates were removed, and 14 studies met inclusion criteria (USA n = 6; Asia n = 4; Africa n = 3; Europe n = 1). Most were cohort studies, with one randomized trial. EEN was consistently associated with shorter mechanical ventilation duration (5.86 ± 3.63 vs 11.96 ± 9.17 days, p = 0.002), reduced PICU and hospital length of stay (4 vs 11.5 days, p < 0.001), and lower infection rates (16.7 % vs 41.1 %, p = 0.001). Barriers to EEN included hemodynamic instability, gastrointestinal intolerance, and procedural interruptions, while facilitators included multidisciplinary teamwork, nurse-led feeding protocols, and standardized nutritional guidelines.

Conclusion

EEN initiated within 24–48 h was generally associated with favorable clinical outcomes; however, evidence on feasibility and safety remains limited and heterogeneous. Strengthening nursing autonomy and implementing standardized feeding pathways may enhance timely nutrition delivery and support recovery in pediatric intensive care.

Implications for clinical practice

Pediatric intensive care nurses play a pivotal role in initiating and monitoring EEN. Empowering nurses through evidence-based feeding protocols and multidisciplinary education can promote timely nutrition delivery and improve recovery in critically ill children.
危重儿童早期肠内营养支持和临床结果:范围综述。
背景和目的:儿童营养不良被定义为营养摄入与需求之间的不平衡,导致累积的能量、蛋白质或微量营养素缺乏,在危重儿童中非常普遍,并对生长和恢复产生负面影响。早期肠内营养(EEN)越来越被认为是预防或解决儿童重症监护病房(picu)营养不良的关键策略。尽管越来越多的证据表明EEN可以改善临床结果,但其在该人群中的可行性和影响仍然存在不确定性。本综述旨在整理危重儿童使用EEN的现有证据,评估其对关键临床结果的影响,包括机械通气时间、住院时间和感染风险;并确定在儿科重症监护环境中实施的障碍和促进因素。方法:根据Joanna Briggs研究所的方法和PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL和Cochrane Library中进行检索。如果研究涉及1个月至18岁的儿童,并在PICU入院后48小时内开始肠内营养,则研究符合条件。关键词:儿童,危重疾病,肠内营养,重症监护病房,儿科学。包括英语或意大利语的研究,没有日期限制。结果:共鉴定记录16799条;剔除重复项后筛选了15,556项研究,其中14项研究符合纳入标准(美国n = 6;亚洲n = 4;非洲n = 3;欧洲n = 1)。大多数是队列研究,其中有一项随机试验。EEN与较短的机械通气时间(5.86±3.63天vs 11.96±9.17天,p = 0.002)、减少PICU和住院时间(4天vs 11.5天,p)一致相关。结论:在24-48小时内启动EEN通常与良好的临床结果相关;然而,关于可行性和安全性的证据仍然有限且存在异质性。加强护理自主权和实施标准化喂养途径可提高儿科重症监护及时提供营养和支持康复。对临床实践的启示:儿科重症监护护士在启动和监测EEN方面发挥着关键作用。通过循证喂养方案和多学科教育赋予护士权力,可以促进及时提供营养,改善危重儿童的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书