Theodora R Barkoula, Christiana Ioannou, Martina Rekatsina, Kassiani Theodoraki, Panagiotis Zis
{"title":"Cutoffs, sensitivity and specificity of the Ewing battery in evaluating autonomic nervous system disorders: a systematic review.","authors":"Theodora R Barkoula, Christiana Ioannou, Martina Rekatsina, Kassiani Theodoraki, Panagiotis Zis","doi":"10.1007/s10286-025-01185-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many methods have been developed for the assessment of dysautonomia, but they are often unreliable and not readily applicable to daily practice. Among the available investigation methods, the Ewing battery, which includes five non-invasive cardiovascular reflex tests, have become the reference standard in assessing dysautonomia and have been utilized for more than four decades. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic thresholds and diagnostic performance of Ewing tests across studies in identifying autonomic nervous system (ANS) disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive multi-database literature search, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, using a pre-defined search strategy, for studies that applied the Ewing tests to assess autonomic dysfunction. We focused on studies that used continuous recordings and those reporting extractable numerical data, including either normative values or diagnostic cutoff thresholds for the Ewing tests. The Ewing parameters that were tested were Valsalva manoeuvre, heart rate variability during deep breathing (E/I ratio), the isometric handgrip, heart rate response to standing (30:15 ratio) and blood pressure response to standing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis demonstrates good diagnostic performance of the Ewing tests, with sensitivity for individual components reaching up to 91% for Valsalva ratio (VR) in some cohorts. The normative data and respective cutoff points are influenced by age and sex. Optimal diagnostic performance was achieved when the Ewing battery was interpreted using the conventional criterion of ≥ 2/5 abnormal tests particularly when age-adjusted cutoffs were applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ewing battery remains a highly effective tool for diagnosing ANS disorders, especially when age-adjusted normative thresholds are used. To further enhance its diagnostic performance, each laboratory should establish its own normative data reflective of the specific population it serves.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":"155-173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13068710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-025-01185-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Many methods have been developed for the assessment of dysautonomia, but they are often unreliable and not readily applicable to daily practice. Among the available investigation methods, the Ewing battery, which includes five non-invasive cardiovascular reflex tests, have become the reference standard in assessing dysautonomia and have been utilized for more than four decades. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic thresholds and diagnostic performance of Ewing tests across studies in identifying autonomic nervous system (ANS) disorders.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive multi-database literature search, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, using a pre-defined search strategy, for studies that applied the Ewing tests to assess autonomic dysfunction. We focused on studies that used continuous recordings and those reporting extractable numerical data, including either normative values or diagnostic cutoff thresholds for the Ewing tests. The Ewing parameters that were tested were Valsalva manoeuvre, heart rate variability during deep breathing (E/I ratio), the isometric handgrip, heart rate response to standing (30:15 ratio) and blood pressure response to standing.
Results: Our analysis demonstrates good diagnostic performance of the Ewing tests, with sensitivity for individual components reaching up to 91% for Valsalva ratio (VR) in some cohorts. The normative data and respective cutoff points are influenced by age and sex. Optimal diagnostic performance was achieved when the Ewing battery was interpreted using the conventional criterion of ≥ 2/5 abnormal tests particularly when age-adjusted cutoffs were applied.
Conclusion: The Ewing battery remains a highly effective tool for diagnosing ANS disorders, especially when age-adjusted normative thresholds are used. To further enhance its diagnostic performance, each laboratory should establish its own normative data reflective of the specific population it serves.
目的:已经开发了许多评估自主神经异常的方法,但它们往往不可靠,不容易适用于日常实践。在现有的调查方法中,包括五项无创心血管反射测试的Ewing电池已成为评估自主神经障碍的参考标准,并已使用了四十多年。本系统综述评估了Ewing测试在识别自主神经系统(ANS)疾病研究中的诊断阈值和诊断性能。方法:我们使用预定义的搜索策略,对应用Ewing测试评估自主神经功能障碍的研究进行了全面的多数据库文献检索,包括PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library。我们重点关注那些使用连续记录和报告可提取数值数据的研究,包括Ewing测试的规范性值或诊断截止阈值。测试的Ewing参数包括Valsalva动作、深呼吸时的心率变异性(E/I比)、等长握力、站立时的心率反应(30:15比)和站立时的血压反应。结果:我们的分析表明Ewing试验具有良好的诊断性能,在一些队列中,Valsalva比率(VR)的单个成分灵敏度高达91%。规范数据和各自的截止点受年龄和性别的影响。当尤因电池使用≥2/5异常测试的常规标准进行解释时,特别是当应用年龄调整截止值时,诊断性能达到最佳。结论:Ewing电池仍然是诊断ANS疾病的一个非常有效的工具,特别是当使用年龄调整的规范阈值时。为了进一步提高其诊断性能,每个实验室应该建立自己的规范性数据,反映其服务的特定人群。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease.
This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.