Penetrating the Political in Public Sector Accounting and Audit: Addressing Public, Managerial, and Political Accountability

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Lee D. Parker, Alvise Favotto
{"title":"Penetrating the Political in Public Sector Accounting and Audit: Addressing Public, Managerial, and Political Accountability","authors":"Lee D. Parker,&nbsp;Alvise Favotto","doi":"10.1111/faam.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Public sector accounting and audit are intrinsically related to the political environment in which they are situated. This study critically investigates the interactions between the political and public sector accountability with specific regard to political agenda and reputation management, politicians' use of accounting reports, and the political environment of performance auditing. Drawing on international public sector accounting research and informed by concepts of public, managerial and political accountability, the study reveals the significant impacts of political risk and reputation agendas on accountability discharge, the limited engagement of politicians with accounting reports, and politicians' perceptions of opportunities and threats posed by performance audit reports. The study accordingly presents revised concepts of managed public accountability, politico-managerial accountability, and internal political accountability that critically reflect political impacts on public sector accountability. This sets a foundation for future public sector research focus and design that takes greater account of political influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47120,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accountability & Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"49-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faam.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accountability & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faam.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public sector accounting and audit are intrinsically related to the political environment in which they are situated. This study critically investigates the interactions between the political and public sector accountability with specific regard to political agenda and reputation management, politicians' use of accounting reports, and the political environment of performance auditing. Drawing on international public sector accounting research and informed by concepts of public, managerial and political accountability, the study reveals the significant impacts of political risk and reputation agendas on accountability discharge, the limited engagement of politicians with accounting reports, and politicians' perceptions of opportunities and threats posed by performance audit reports. The study accordingly presents revised concepts of managed public accountability, politico-managerial accountability, and internal political accountability that critically reflect political impacts on public sector accountability. This sets a foundation for future public sector research focus and design that takes greater account of political influence.

在公共部门会计和审计中渗透政治:解决公共、管理和政治责任
公共部门的会计和审计与它们所处的政治环境有着内在的联系。本研究批判性地调查了政治和公共部门问责制之间的相互作用,具体涉及政治议程和声誉管理,政治家使用会计报告,以及绩效审计的政治环境。借鉴国际公共部门会计研究,借鉴公共问责制、管理问责制和政治问责制的概念,该研究揭示了政治风险和声誉议程对问责制履行的重大影响,政治家对会计报告的有限参与,以及政治家对绩效审计报告所带来的机会和威胁的看法。因此,该研究提出了经修订的管理公共问责制、政治管理问责制和内部政治问责制的概念,这些概念批判性地反映了政治对公共部门问责制的影响。这为未来公共部门的研究重点和设计更多地考虑政治影响奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书