Scrutinizing the Scrutiny: How Do Professional Auditors Approach Digital Ventures in Municipal Value for Money Audits?

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Joakim Engström, Peter Öhman, Torbjörn Tagesson
{"title":"Scrutinizing the Scrutiny: How Do Professional Auditors Approach Digital Ventures in Municipal Value for Money Audits?","authors":"Joakim Engström,&nbsp;Peter Öhman,&nbsp;Torbjörn Tagesson","doi":"10.1111/faam.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The emphasis on digitalization has significantly affected public sector organizations, including municipalities, as they strive to improve operational efficiency, transparency, and public value. Nevertheless, historical examples reveal high failure rates in digitalization projects, often resulting in delays, financial losses, and political repercussions. These failures underscore the importance of conducting value for money (VFM) audits to ensure digitalization projects are accountable and beneficial to the taxpaying citizens. This study critically examines the work of professional auditors in VFM audits related to digitalization projects within Swedish municipalities during the 2016–2023 period. The findings suggest that these audits primarily address organizational aspects, rather than improved economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. In this context, VFM audits appear to function as standardized and time-efficient procedures aimed at providing comfort to various stakeholders, without assessing the actual efficiency gains from digitalization initiatives. A possible reason for this is that the auditors seek to make digitalization initiatives auditable, given the acknowledged challenges of evaluating such projects. Future research is therefore encouraged to further explore this pattern in VFM audits of digitalization projects, ideally incorporating the perspectives of different actors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47120,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accountability & Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"90-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faam.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accountability & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faam.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emphasis on digitalization has significantly affected public sector organizations, including municipalities, as they strive to improve operational efficiency, transparency, and public value. Nevertheless, historical examples reveal high failure rates in digitalization projects, often resulting in delays, financial losses, and political repercussions. These failures underscore the importance of conducting value for money (VFM) audits to ensure digitalization projects are accountable and beneficial to the taxpaying citizens. This study critically examines the work of professional auditors in VFM audits related to digitalization projects within Swedish municipalities during the 2016–2023 period. The findings suggest that these audits primarily address organizational aspects, rather than improved economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. In this context, VFM audits appear to function as standardized and time-efficient procedures aimed at providing comfort to various stakeholders, without assessing the actual efficiency gains from digitalization initiatives. A possible reason for this is that the auditors seek to make digitalization initiatives auditable, given the acknowledged challenges of evaluating such projects. Future research is therefore encouraged to further explore this pattern in VFM audits of digitalization projects, ideally incorporating the perspectives of different actors.

审查审查:专业审计师如何处理市政物有所值审计中的数字风险?
对数字化的重视对包括市政当局在内的公共部门组织产生了重大影响,因为它们正在努力提高运营效率、透明度和公共价值。然而,历史上的例子表明,数字化项目的失败率很高,往往导致延误、经济损失和政治影响。这些失败凸显了进行物有所值(VFM)审计的重要性,以确保数字化项目是负责任的,并有利于纳税公民。本研究严格审查了2016-2023年期间瑞典市政当局数字化项目相关的VFM审计专业审计员的工作。调查结果表明,这些审计主要针对组织方面,而不是改进经济、效率和有效性。在这种情况下,VFM审计似乎是一种标准化和省时的程序,旨在为各种利益相关者提供安慰,而无需评估数字化计划的实际效率收益。造成这种情况的一个可能原因是,考虑到评估此类项目的公认挑战,审计人员寻求使数字化计划可审计。因此,鼓励未来的研究在数字化项目的VFM审计中进一步探索这种模式,理想地结合不同参与者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书