Exploring Factors That Impact Genetic Counseling Referral and Uptake Using Learning Health Approaches

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Samantha Greenberg, Bob Wong, Katherine A. Sward, Kathleen A. Cooney, Jonathan Tward, Andrew Post, Mollie R. Cummins
{"title":"Exploring Factors That Impact Genetic Counseling Referral and Uptake Using Learning Health Approaches","authors":"Samantha Greenberg,&nbsp;Bob Wong,&nbsp;Katherine A. Sward,&nbsp;Kathleen A. Cooney,&nbsp;Jonathan Tward,&nbsp;Andrew Post,&nbsp;Mollie R. Cummins","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Germline testing and pretest genetic counseling are advised for many cancer patients, yet not all receive these services. Electronic Health Records (EHRs) offer a valuable resource to measure referral to genetic counseling (referral receipt) and uptake (completion of counseling). This study uses EHR data to assess demographic factors influencing genetic counseling referral and uptake among prostate cancer patients, serving as a learning health system model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included prostate cancer patients who met germline testing and counseling criteria at an NCI-designated cancer center from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022. Demographic factors—age at diagnosis, race, employment, insurance, and geographic region—were assessed for associations with genetic counseling referral and uptake. Analyses involved descriptive statistics, two-group comparisons, and regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 356 prostate cancer patients, only 34.2% received genetic counseling referrals, and of these, 73% completed a counseling visit. Older patients were less likely to receive referrals (OR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.89–0.97]) and complete visits (OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.87–0.96]). Patients employed full-time were more likely to receive referrals (39.2% vs. 23.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.01), while White (93% vs. 81%; <i>p</i> = 0.047) and rural patients (42.7% vs. 6.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) had higher uptake. Insurance status did not significantly affect referral or uptake.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates the potential of EHRs to identify demographic disparities in genetic counseling services. Using a learning health system approach, healthcare institutions can leverage EHR data to design targeted interventions aimed at improving access and reducing disparities in genetic services, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Germline testing and pretest genetic counseling are advised for many cancer patients, yet not all receive these services. Electronic Health Records (EHRs) offer a valuable resource to measure referral to genetic counseling (referral receipt) and uptake (completion of counseling). This study uses EHR data to assess demographic factors influencing genetic counseling referral and uptake among prostate cancer patients, serving as a learning health system model.

Methods

We included prostate cancer patients who met germline testing and counseling criteria at an NCI-designated cancer center from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022. Demographic factors—age at diagnosis, race, employment, insurance, and geographic region—were assessed for associations with genetic counseling referral and uptake. Analyses involved descriptive statistics, two-group comparisons, and regression models.

Results

Among 356 prostate cancer patients, only 34.2% received genetic counseling referrals, and of these, 73% completed a counseling visit. Older patients were less likely to receive referrals (OR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.89–0.97]) and complete visits (OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.87–0.96]). Patients employed full-time were more likely to receive referrals (39.2% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.01), while White (93% vs. 81%; p = 0.047) and rural patients (42.7% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.02) had higher uptake. Insurance status did not significantly affect referral or uptake.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential of EHRs to identify demographic disparities in genetic counseling services. Using a learning health system approach, healthcare institutions can leverage EHR data to design targeted interventions aimed at improving access and reducing disparities in genetic services, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

利用学习健康方法探索影响遗传咨询转诊和吸收的因素
许多癌症患者建议进行生殖系检测和检测前遗传咨询,但并非所有患者都接受这些服务。电子健康记录(EHRs)提供了一个宝贵的资源来衡量转介到遗传咨询(转介接收)和吸收(咨询完成)。本研究使用电子病历数据评估影响前列腺癌患者遗传咨询转诊和接受的人口统计学因素,作为学习卫生系统模型。方法纳入2018年1月1日至2022年6月30日在nci指定的癌症中心符合生殖系检测和咨询标准的前列腺癌患者。人口统计学因素——诊断年龄、种族、就业、保险和地理区域——被评估与遗传咨询转诊和接受的关系。分析包括描述性统计、两组比较和回归模型。结果356例前列腺癌患者中,只有34.2%的人接受了遗传咨询,其中73%的人完成了咨询拜访。老年患者接受转诊(OR = 0.93, 95% CI[0.89-0.97])和完整就诊(OR = 0.92, 95% CI[0.87-0.96])的可能性较小。全职工作的患者更容易接受转诊(39.2% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.01),而白人(93% vs. 81%; p = 0.047)和农村患者(42.7% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.02)的接受率更高。保险状况对转诊或吸收没有显著影响。结论:本研究表明电子病历在遗传咨询服务中具有识别人口差异的潜力。使用学习型卫生系统方法,卫生保健机构可以利用电子病历数据设计有针对性的干预措施,旨在改善遗传服务的可及性并减少差异,最终提高患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书