Variations in quality of life in people with multimorbidity: A cross-sectional survey comparing MMQ1 and EQ-5D-5L.

IF 2.7
Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2026-01-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565251410275
Kieran D Sweeney, Dilek Coskun, Volkert Siersma, Lucy E Stirland, Bruce Guthrie, Stewart W Mercer, John B Brodersen
{"title":"Variations in quality of life in people with multimorbidity: A cross-sectional survey comparing MMQ1 and EQ-5D-5L.","authors":"Kieran D Sweeney, Dilek Coskun, Volkert Siersma, Lucy E Stirland, Bruce Guthrie, Stewart W Mercer, John B Brodersen","doi":"10.1177/26335565251410275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Multimorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ1) is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing quality of life (QoL) in people with multimorbidity. An English-language version was recently validated for use in the United Kingdom. This study examines: (1) Whether MMQ1 detects expected variations in QoL according to individual characteristics; (2) How MMQ1 compares with EQ-5D-5L in detecting such variations, and in discriminating between different levels of QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A postal survey was distributed to 2753 patients with multimorbidity. Relationships between MMQ1 and EQ-5D-5L with six independent variables (long-term condition count, mental-physical multimorbidity, deprivation, self-rated QoL, age and sex) were examined using linear regression analyses. Discriminative ability was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and sample size calculations with respect to consecutive classes of self-rated QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>597 responses were received (22%). Respondents had a mean age of 69.5 years and 48% were men. Higher long-term condition count, the presence of mental-physical multimorbidity and increasing deprivation were associated with poorer QoL on both measures. In addition, three MMQ1 domains demonstrated age-related variations in QoL that were not detected using EQ-5D-5L. MMQ1 exhibited superior discriminative ability to EQ-5D-5L, especially in distinguishing between individuals with 'Poor' vs 'Very Poor' self-rated QoL, where EQ-5D-5L was particularly weak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMQ1 detected expected variations in QoL according to individual characteristics, supporting known-groups validity. It was superior to EQ-5D-5L in its ability to detect age-related variations in QoL and to discriminate between different levels of self-rated QoL. MMQ1 has the potential to improve the measurement of QoL in people with multimorbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"16 ","pages":"26335565251410275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251410275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Multimorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ1) is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing quality of life (QoL) in people with multimorbidity. An English-language version was recently validated for use in the United Kingdom. This study examines: (1) Whether MMQ1 detects expected variations in QoL according to individual characteristics; (2) How MMQ1 compares with EQ-5D-5L in detecting such variations, and in discriminating between different levels of QoL.

Methods: A postal survey was distributed to 2753 patients with multimorbidity. Relationships between MMQ1 and EQ-5D-5L with six independent variables (long-term condition count, mental-physical multimorbidity, deprivation, self-rated QoL, age and sex) were examined using linear regression analyses. Discriminative ability was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and sample size calculations with respect to consecutive classes of self-rated QoL.

Results: 597 responses were received (22%). Respondents had a mean age of 69.5 years and 48% were men. Higher long-term condition count, the presence of mental-physical multimorbidity and increasing deprivation were associated with poorer QoL on both measures. In addition, three MMQ1 domains demonstrated age-related variations in QoL that were not detected using EQ-5D-5L. MMQ1 exhibited superior discriminative ability to EQ-5D-5L, especially in distinguishing between individuals with 'Poor' vs 'Very Poor' self-rated QoL, where EQ-5D-5L was particularly weak.

Conclusion: MMQ1 detected expected variations in QoL according to individual characteristics, supporting known-groups validity. It was superior to EQ-5D-5L in its ability to detect age-related variations in QoL and to discriminate between different levels of self-rated QoL. MMQ1 has the potential to improve the measurement of QoL in people with multimorbidity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多重疾病患者生活质量的变化:MMQ1和EQ-5D-5L的横断面调查比较
背景:多病问卷(MMQ1)是一种评估多病患者生活质量(QoL)的患者报告的结果测量方法。英语版本最近在英国得到了验证。本研究检验:(1)MMQ1是否根据个体特征检测到预期的生活质量变化;(2) MMQ1与EQ-5D-5L在检测这些变异以及区分不同生活质量水平方面的比较。方法:对2753例多病患者进行邮寄调查。采用线性回归分析检验MMQ1和EQ-5D-5L与6个自变量(长期病情计数、精神-身体多病、剥夺、自评生活质量、年龄和性别)之间的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线和样本量计算对连续类别的自评生活质量进行判别能力评估。结果:共收到回复597份(22%)。受访者的平均年龄为69.5岁,其中48%为男性。在两项测量中,较高的长期病情计数、精神-身体多重疾病的存在和日益增加的剥夺与较差的生活质量有关。此外,三个MMQ1结构域显示了EQ-5D-5L未检测到的与年龄相关的生活质量变化。MMQ1比EQ-5D-5L表现出更强的区分能力,特别是在区分自我评价生活质量“差”和“非常差”的个体时,EQ-5D-5L尤其弱。结论:MMQ1根据个体特征检测到生活质量的预期变化,支持已知组效度。在检测与年龄相关的生活质量变化和区分不同水平的自评生活质量方面,它优于EQ-5D-5L。MMQ1具有改善多重疾病患者生活质量测量的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书