Sex differences in efficacy/safety of anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

IF 2.4 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-18 DOI:10.12793/tcp.2025.33.e19
SoHyeon Lim, Hyun-Woo Lee, Siyeon Yoon, Ji Won Han, Jae-Yong Chung, Seonghae Yoon
{"title":"Sex differences in efficacy/safety of anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"SoHyeon Lim, Hyun-Woo Lee, Siyeon Yoon, Ji Won Han, Jae-Yong Chung, Seonghae Yoon","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2025.33.e19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. AD exhibits notable sex-related disparities in prevalence, progression, and treatment response. With the recent approval of anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibodies-aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab-understanding sex differences in their clinical effects has become increasingly relevant. This review article investigates sex differences in the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab and discusses the possible mechanism underlying the observed differences. Although sex-specific analyses were largely underreported in clinical trials, population pharmacokinetic models identified sex as a covariate affecting clearance and volume of distribution for aducanumab and lecanemab and higher exposure to lecanemab was predicted for females. Subgroup analyses of phase 3 trials revealed that males tended to experience greater benefit from aducanumab and lecanemab, whereas females showed better response to donanemab. The overall incidence of adverse events, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, did not show significant differences between sexes. Potential mechanisms underlying these differences include sex-related variations in blood-brain barrier permeability, apolipoprotein E4-associated neuroinflammatory responses, and baseline disease characteristics. These findings underscore the need for future AD clinical trials to incorporate sex-based analyses and to consider sex as a key factor in optimizing treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"33 4","pages":"212-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12806652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2025.33.e19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. AD exhibits notable sex-related disparities in prevalence, progression, and treatment response. With the recent approval of anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibodies-aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab-understanding sex differences in their clinical effects has become increasingly relevant. This review article investigates sex differences in the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab and discusses the possible mechanism underlying the observed differences. Although sex-specific analyses were largely underreported in clinical trials, population pharmacokinetic models identified sex as a covariate affecting clearance and volume of distribution for aducanumab and lecanemab and higher exposure to lecanemab was predicted for females. Subgroup analyses of phase 3 trials revealed that males tended to experience greater benefit from aducanumab and lecanemab, whereas females showed better response to donanemab. The overall incidence of adverse events, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, did not show significant differences between sexes. Potential mechanisms underlying these differences include sex-related variations in blood-brain barrier permeability, apolipoprotein E4-associated neuroinflammatory responses, and baseline disease characteristics. These findings underscore the need for future AD clinical trials to incorporate sex-based analyses and to consider sex as a key factor in optimizing treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗淀粉样蛋白- β单克隆抗体治疗阿尔茨海默病疗效/安全性的性别差异
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是痴呆症最常见的原因。AD在患病率、进展和治疗反应方面表现出显著的性别差异。随着最近抗淀粉样蛋白- β单克隆抗体(aducanumab, lecanemab和donanemab)的批准,了解其临床效果的性别差异变得越来越重要。这篇综述研究了aducanumab、lecanemab和donanemab在药代动力学、疗效和安全性方面的性别差异,并讨论了观察到差异的可能机制。尽管在临床试验中,性别特异性分析在很大程度上被低估,但群体药代动力学模型将性别确定为影响aducanumab和lecanemab清除率和分布量的协变量,并且预测女性对lecanemab的暴露率更高。3期试验的亚组分析显示,男性倾向于从aducanumab和lecanemab中获得更大的益处,而女性则对donanemab表现出更好的反应。不良事件的总体发生率,包括淀粉样蛋白相关的影像学异常,在性别之间没有显着差异。这些差异的潜在机制包括血脑屏障通透性的性别相关变异、载脂蛋白e4相关的神经炎症反应和基线疾病特征。这些发现强调了未来的阿尔茨海默病临床试验需要纳入基于性别的分析,并将性别作为优化治疗策略的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书