Federated knowledge retrieval elevates large language model performance on biomedical benchmarks.

IF 5 2区 生物学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Janet Joy, Andrew I Su
{"title":"Federated knowledge retrieval elevates large language model performance on biomedical benchmarks.","authors":"Janet Joy, Andrew I Su","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/giag007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing in biomedical research; however, their reliance on implicit, statistical representations often results in factual inaccuracies or hallucinations, posing significant concerns in high-stakes biomedical contexts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To overcome these limitations, we developed BioThings Explorer-Retrieval-Augmented Generation (BTE-RAG), a Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework that integrates the reasoning capabilities of advanced language models with explicit mechanistic evidence sourced from BTE, an API federation of more than sixty authoritative biomedical knowledge sources. We systematically evaluated BTE-RAG in comparison to traditional LLM-only methods across three benchmark datasets that we created from DrugMechDB. These datasets specifically targeted gene-centric mechanisms (798 questions), metabolite effects (201 questions), and drug-biological process relationships (842 questions). On the gene-centric task, BTE-RAG increased accuracy from 51 to 75.8% for GPT-4o mini and from 69.8 to 78.6% for GPT-4o. In metabolite-focused questions, the proportion of responses with cosine similarity scores of at least 0.90 rose by 82% for GPT-4o mini and 77% for GPT-4o. While overall accuracy was consistent in the drug-biological process benchmark, the retrieval method enhanced response concordance, producing a greater than 10% increase in high-agreement answers (from 129 to 144) using GPT-4o. We additionally evaluated BTE-RAG alongside GeneGPT-based models on the GeneTuring gene-disease association benchmark and on our mechanistic gene benchmark, demonstrating that the BTE-RAG layer consistently improves accuracy relative to alternative approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Federated knowledge retrieval provides transparent improvements in accuracy for LLMs, establishing BTE-RAG as a valuable and practical tool for mechanistic exploration and translational biomedical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12581,"journal":{"name":"GigaScience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12888809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GigaScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giag007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing in biomedical research; however, their reliance on implicit, statistical representations often results in factual inaccuracies or hallucinations, posing significant concerns in high-stakes biomedical contexts.

Results: To overcome these limitations, we developed BioThings Explorer-Retrieval-Augmented Generation (BTE-RAG), a Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework that integrates the reasoning capabilities of advanced language models with explicit mechanistic evidence sourced from BTE, an API federation of more than sixty authoritative biomedical knowledge sources. We systematically evaluated BTE-RAG in comparison to traditional LLM-only methods across three benchmark datasets that we created from DrugMechDB. These datasets specifically targeted gene-centric mechanisms (798 questions), metabolite effects (201 questions), and drug-biological process relationships (842 questions). On the gene-centric task, BTE-RAG increased accuracy from 51 to 75.8% for GPT-4o mini and from 69.8 to 78.6% for GPT-4o. In metabolite-focused questions, the proportion of responses with cosine similarity scores of at least 0.90 rose by 82% for GPT-4o mini and 77% for GPT-4o. While overall accuracy was consistent in the drug-biological process benchmark, the retrieval method enhanced response concordance, producing a greater than 10% increase in high-agreement answers (from 129 to 144) using GPT-4o. We additionally evaluated BTE-RAG alongside GeneGPT-based models on the GeneTuring gene-disease association benchmark and on our mechanistic gene benchmark, demonstrating that the BTE-RAG layer consistently improves accuracy relative to alternative approaches.

Conclusion: Federated knowledge retrieval provides transparent improvements in accuracy for LLMs, establishing BTE-RAG as a valuable and practical tool for mechanistic exploration and translational biomedical research.

联邦知识检索提高大型语言模型在生物医学基准上的性能。
背景:大型语言模型(llm)在生物医学研究中显著推进了自然语言处理,然而,它们对隐式统计表示的依赖往往导致事实不准确或幻觉,这在高风险的生物医学环境中引起了重大关注。结果:为了克服这些限制,我们开发了BTE-RAG,这是一个检索增强生成框架,将高级语言模型的推理能力与来自BioThings Explorer(一个由60多个权威生物医学知识来源组成的API联盟)的明确机制证据集成在一起。通过从DrugMechDB创建的三个基准数据集,我们系统地评估了BTE-RAG与传统LLM-only方法的比较。这些数据集专门针对以基因为中心的机制(798个问题)、代谢物效应(201个问题)和药物-生物过程关系(842个问题)。在以基因为中心的任务中,BTE-RAG将gpt - 40 mini的准确率从51%提高到75.8%,将gpt - 40 mini的准确率从69.8%提高到78.6%。在以代谢物为重点的问题中,gpt - 40 mini和gpt - 40的余弦相似度得分至少为0.90的回答比例分别上升了82%和77%。虽然总体准确性与药物-生物过程基准一致,但检索方法增强了响应一致性,使用gpt - 40产生的高一致性答案(从129到144)增加了10%以上。我们还在GeneTuring基因-疾病关联基准和我们的机制基因基准上评估了BTE-RAG和基于genegpt的模型,证明BTE-RAG层相对于其他方法始终提高准确性。结论:联邦知识检索为大型语言模型的准确性提供了透明的改进,使BTE-RAG成为机械探索和转化生物医学研究中有价值和实用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GigaScience
GigaScience MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: GigaScience seeks to transform data dissemination and utilization in the life and biomedical sciences. As an online open-access open-data journal, it specializes in publishing "big-data" studies encompassing various fields. Its scope includes not only "omic" type data and the fields of high-throughput biology currently serviced by large public repositories, but also the growing range of more difficult-to-access data, such as imaging, neuroscience, ecology, cohort data, systems biology and other new types of large-scale shareable data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书