Influence of chemical enhancer injection timings on electrokinetic geosynthetics-assisted vacuum preloading combined with electroosmosis for dredged sediments dewatering and heavy metal removal

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Geotextiles and Geomembranes Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2026.01.005
Yang Shen , Ligao Zheng , Wencheng Qi , Chang Liu , Jianting Feng
{"title":"Influence of chemical enhancer injection timings on electrokinetic geosynthetics-assisted vacuum preloading combined with electroosmosis for dredged sediments dewatering and heavy metal removal","authors":"Yang Shen ,&nbsp;Ligao Zheng ,&nbsp;Wencheng Qi ,&nbsp;Chang Liu ,&nbsp;Jianting Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective dewatering and heavy metal removal of dredged sediments using the electrokinetic geosynthetics-assisted vacuum preloading combined with electroosmosis (VPE) technique can convert dredged sediments into valuable resources for construction use. Chemical enhancers are commonly employed to enhance VPE performance, but their optimal injection timing remains largely unclear. This study investigated the influence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citric acid (CA) as well as their injection timings on the VPE efficacy for dredged sediment improvement. It compared drainage volume and drainage rate, moisture content, electric current and effective voltage, Cu concentration and speciation, and energy consumption under early- (I<sub>t</sub> = I<sub>0</sub>), mid- (I<sub>t</sub> = 70 %I<sub>0</sub>), and late-stage (I<sub>t</sub> = 40 %I<sub>0</sub>) injections. The results showed that CA generally outperformed EDTA, achieving approximately 200 mL greater final drainage volumes and averagely reducing Cu concentrations from ∼1640 mg/kg to ∼745 mg/kg (EDTA was ∼755 mg/kg). Late-stage CA injection optimized drainage efficiency and moisture content uniformity. It reduced the moisture content gradients between the cathode and the anode to ∼4 % (it was ∼12 % for the injection of I<sub>t</sub> = I<sub>0</sub>). The mid-stage injection of CA may achieve a balance between Cu removal and energy efficiency. EDTA, while less energy-intensive, retained higher weak-acid extractable Cu (∼15 %), posing leaching risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"54 3","pages":"Pages 403-413"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114426000051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective dewatering and heavy metal removal of dredged sediments using the electrokinetic geosynthetics-assisted vacuum preloading combined with electroosmosis (VPE) technique can convert dredged sediments into valuable resources for construction use. Chemical enhancers are commonly employed to enhance VPE performance, but their optimal injection timing remains largely unclear. This study investigated the influence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citric acid (CA) as well as their injection timings on the VPE efficacy for dredged sediment improvement. It compared drainage volume and drainage rate, moisture content, electric current and effective voltage, Cu concentration and speciation, and energy consumption under early- (It = I0), mid- (It = 70 %I0), and late-stage (It = 40 %I0) injections. The results showed that CA generally outperformed EDTA, achieving approximately 200 mL greater final drainage volumes and averagely reducing Cu concentrations from ∼1640 mg/kg to ∼745 mg/kg (EDTA was ∼755 mg/kg). Late-stage CA injection optimized drainage efficiency and moisture content uniformity. It reduced the moisture content gradients between the cathode and the anode to ∼4 % (it was ∼12 % for the injection of It = I0). The mid-stage injection of CA may achieve a balance between Cu removal and energy efficiency. EDTA, while less energy-intensive, retained higher weak-acid extractable Cu (∼15 %), posing leaching risks.
化学增强剂注入时间对电动土工合成助力真空预压联合电渗透疏浚沉积物脱水除重金属的影响
利用电动土工合成助力真空预压结合电渗透(VPE)技术对疏浚沉积物进行有效脱水和重金属去除,可将疏浚沉积物转化为有价值的建筑资源。化学增强剂通常用于提高VPE性能,但其最佳注射时间仍不清楚。本研究考察了乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和柠檬酸(CA)及其注入时间对疏浚底泥VPE改善效果的影响。比较了早期(It = I0)、中期(It = 70% I0)和后期(It = 40% I0)注射的排液量和排液速率、含水率、电流和有效电压、Cu浓度和形态、能耗。结果表明,CA总体上优于EDTA,最终排水量增加约200 mL,平均将Cu浓度从~ 1640 mg/kg降至~ 745 mg/kg (EDTA为~ 755 mg/kg)。后期CA注入优化了排水效率和含水率均匀性。它将阴极和阳极之间的水分含量梯度降低到~ 4%(注射It = I0时为~ 12%)。中期注入CA可以达到Cu去除和能量效率之间的平衡。EDTA虽然能耗较低,但保留了较高的弱酸可提取铜(约15%),存在浸出风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书