Ignacio Fernandez-Hurtado,Naila Pages-Valle,Maria F Sarubbo,Olga Claramonte-Bellmunt,Santiago Baena-Bradaschia,Jose A Cifuentes-Rodenas,Xavier Serra-Aracil
{"title":"Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for grade III haemorrhoids: open-label randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Ignacio Fernandez-Hurtado,Naila Pages-Valle,Maria F Sarubbo,Olga Claramonte-Bellmunt,Santiago Baena-Bradaschia,Jose A Cifuentes-Rodenas,Xavier Serra-Aracil","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nOpen excisional haemorrhoidectomy (OEH) remains the standard treatment for advanced haemorrhoidal disease, offering low recurrence but notable postoperative pain. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is an alternative with reduced pain but potentially higher recurrence. The aim of this trial was to compare the 1-year efficacy of both techniques using validated symptom and quality-of-life scores.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA prospective, single-centre, randomized, open-label trial was conducted in patients with grade III haemorrhoids. The primary outcome was the relative change at 12 months in Haemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) and Short Health Scale adapted for Haemorrhoidal Disease (SHS-HD) from baseline. Additionally, the predefined, pragmatic composite endpoint-the clinical failure rate (CFR), defined as a ≤50% improvement in both HDSS and SHS-HD-was compared. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, time to return to work, complications, and reoperation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFrom August 2021 to February 2023, 50 patients were randomized (25 OEH patients and 25 THD patients). Three patients were lost to follow-up (2 THD patients and 1 OEH patient). CFR was significantly higher in the THD group (14 of 23 (61%)) versus the OEH group (2 of 24 (8%)) (P <0.001). All eigth reoperations occurred in the THD group (P = 0.001). Both procedures reduced symptom and quality-of-life scores (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). OEH was associated with greater early postoperative pain and a longer time to return to work (median of 21 versus 14 days; P = 0.010).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nOEH is more effective than THD but is associated with greater early postoperative pain.\r\n\r\nREGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nNCT06420986 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf282","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy (OEH) remains the standard treatment for advanced haemorrhoidal disease, offering low recurrence but notable postoperative pain. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is an alternative with reduced pain but potentially higher recurrence. The aim of this trial was to compare the 1-year efficacy of both techniques using validated symptom and quality-of-life scores.
METHODS
A prospective, single-centre, randomized, open-label trial was conducted in patients with grade III haemorrhoids. The primary outcome was the relative change at 12 months in Haemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) and Short Health Scale adapted for Haemorrhoidal Disease (SHS-HD) from baseline. Additionally, the predefined, pragmatic composite endpoint-the clinical failure rate (CFR), defined as a ≤50% improvement in both HDSS and SHS-HD-was compared. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, time to return to work, complications, and reoperation.
RESULTS
From August 2021 to February 2023, 50 patients were randomized (25 OEH patients and 25 THD patients). Three patients were lost to follow-up (2 THD patients and 1 OEH patient). CFR was significantly higher in the THD group (14 of 23 (61%)) versus the OEH group (2 of 24 (8%)) (P <0.001). All eigth reoperations occurred in the THD group (P = 0.001). Both procedures reduced symptom and quality-of-life scores (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). OEH was associated with greater early postoperative pain and a longer time to return to work (median of 21 versus 14 days; P = 0.010).
CONCLUSION
OEH is more effective than THD but is associated with greater early postoperative pain.
REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT06420986 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology.
While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.