Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for grade III haemorrhoids: open-label randomized clinical trial.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ignacio Fernandez-Hurtado,Naila Pages-Valle,Maria F Sarubbo,Olga Claramonte-Bellmunt,Santiago Baena-Bradaschia,Jose A Cifuentes-Rodenas,Xavier Serra-Aracil
{"title":"Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for grade III haemorrhoids: open-label randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Ignacio Fernandez-Hurtado,Naila Pages-Valle,Maria F Sarubbo,Olga Claramonte-Bellmunt,Santiago Baena-Bradaschia,Jose A Cifuentes-Rodenas,Xavier Serra-Aracil","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nOpen excisional haemorrhoidectomy (OEH) remains the standard treatment for advanced haemorrhoidal disease, offering low recurrence but notable postoperative pain. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is an alternative with reduced pain but potentially higher recurrence. The aim of this trial was to compare the 1-year efficacy of both techniques using validated symptom and quality-of-life scores.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA prospective, single-centre, randomized, open-label trial was conducted in patients with grade III haemorrhoids. The primary outcome was the relative change at 12 months in Haemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) and Short Health Scale adapted for Haemorrhoidal Disease (SHS-HD) from baseline. Additionally, the predefined, pragmatic composite endpoint-the clinical failure rate (CFR), defined as a ≤50% improvement in both HDSS and SHS-HD-was compared. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, time to return to work, complications, and reoperation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFrom August 2021 to February 2023, 50 patients were randomized (25 OEH patients and 25 THD patients). Three patients were lost to follow-up (2 THD patients and 1 OEH patient). CFR was significantly higher in the THD group (14 of 23 (61%)) versus the OEH group (2 of 24 (8%)) (P <0.001). All eigth reoperations occurred in the THD group (P = 0.001). Both procedures reduced symptom and quality-of-life scores (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). OEH was associated with greater early postoperative pain and a longer time to return to work (median of 21 versus 14 days; P = 0.010).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nOEH is more effective than THD but is associated with greater early postoperative pain.\r\n\r\nREGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nNCT06420986 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf282","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy (OEH) remains the standard treatment for advanced haemorrhoidal disease, offering low recurrence but notable postoperative pain. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is an alternative with reduced pain but potentially higher recurrence. The aim of this trial was to compare the 1-year efficacy of both techniques using validated symptom and quality-of-life scores. METHODS A prospective, single-centre, randomized, open-label trial was conducted in patients with grade III haemorrhoids. The primary outcome was the relative change at 12 months in Haemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) and Short Health Scale adapted for Haemorrhoidal Disease (SHS-HD) from baseline. Additionally, the predefined, pragmatic composite endpoint-the clinical failure rate (CFR), defined as a ≤50% improvement in both HDSS and SHS-HD-was compared. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, time to return to work, complications, and reoperation. RESULTS From August 2021 to February 2023, 50 patients were randomized (25 OEH patients and 25 THD patients). Three patients were lost to follow-up (2 THD patients and 1 OEH patient). CFR was significantly higher in the THD group (14 of 23 (61%)) versus the OEH group (2 of 24 (8%)) (P <0.001). All eigth reoperations occurred in the THD group (P = 0.001). Both procedures reduced symptom and quality-of-life scores (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). OEH was associated with greater early postoperative pain and a longer time to return to work (median of 21 versus 14 days; P = 0.010). CONCLUSION OEH is more effective than THD but is associated with greater early postoperative pain. REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT06420986 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
开放切除痔切除术与经肛门痔去动脉化治疗III级痔疮:开放标签随机临床试验。
背景:开放性痔疮切除术(OEH)仍然是晚期痔疮疾病的标准治疗方法,复发率低,但术后疼痛明显。经肛门痔疮去动脉化术(THD)是一种疼痛减轻但复发率较高的替代方法。本试验的目的是比较两种技术使用验证症状和生活质量评分的1年疗效。方法对III级痔疮患者进行前瞻性、单中心、随机、开放标签试验。主要终点是12个月时痔疮症状评分(HDSS)和适用于痔疮疾病的短期健康量表(SHS-HD)相对于基线的相对变化。此外,还比较了预定义的实用复合终点——临床失败率(CFR),定义为HDSS和shs - hd的改善≤50%。次要结果包括术后疼痛、恢复工作时间、并发症和再手术。结果从2021年8月至2023年2月,随机抽取50例患者(25例OEH患者和25例THD患者)。3例患者失访(2例THD, 1例OEH)。THD组的CFR(23例中14例(61%))明显高于OEH组(24例中2例(8%))(P <0.001)。THD组8例再手术全部发生(P = 0.001)。两种方法均可降低症状和生活质量评分(P = 0.002和P < 0.001)。OEH与较大的术后早期疼痛和较长的恢复工作时间相关(中位数为21天对14天;P = 0.010)。结论oeh比THD更有效,但术后早期疼痛更大。注册号:06420986 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书