Omar A M Gharib, Samuel W Remedios, Blake E Dewey, Jerry L Prince, Aaron Carass
{"title":"Exploring the Feasibility of Zero-Shot Super-Resolution in Preclinical Imaging.","authors":"Omar A M Gharib, Samuel W Remedios, Blake E Dewey, Jerry L Prince, Aaron Carass","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-04937-7_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preclinical imaging studies are vital to the research, development, and evaluation of new medical therapies. Images acquired during these studies often have high in-plane resolution but low through-plane resolution, resulting in highly anisotropic volumes that hamper downstream volumetric analysis. Additionally, since there are no image acquisition standards across studies, training data for conventional supervised super-resolution (SR) methods is limited. In this work, we compare two SR methods that do not require additional training data. The first is ECLARE, a self-SR approach that creates its own training data from in-plane patches drawn from the anisotropic volume. The second is Biplanar Denoising diffusion null space model (DDNM) Averaging (BiDA), a proposed method leveraging two independently pre-trained denoising diffusion probabilistic models and the DDNM posterior sampling technique. We evaluate both methods first on rat data at two scale factors (2.5× and .5×) and compare signal recovery and downstream task performance. We further evaluate these methods on a different species (mice) to measure their generalizability. Both methods experimentally resulted in good signal recovery performance, but only the images super-resolved by BiDA were accurately skullstripped downstream. Although both methods performed well on the in-domain rat data, BiDA did not fully generalize to the out-of-domain mouse data.</p>","PeriodicalId":94280,"journal":{"name":"Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention","volume":"15961 ","pages":"186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04937-7_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Preclinical imaging studies are vital to the research, development, and evaluation of new medical therapies. Images acquired during these studies often have high in-plane resolution but low through-plane resolution, resulting in highly anisotropic volumes that hamper downstream volumetric analysis. Additionally, since there are no image acquisition standards across studies, training data for conventional supervised super-resolution (SR) methods is limited. In this work, we compare two SR methods that do not require additional training data. The first is ECLARE, a self-SR approach that creates its own training data from in-plane patches drawn from the anisotropic volume. The second is Biplanar Denoising diffusion null space model (DDNM) Averaging (BiDA), a proposed method leveraging two independently pre-trained denoising diffusion probabilistic models and the DDNM posterior sampling technique. We evaluate both methods first on rat data at two scale factors (2.5× and .5×) and compare signal recovery and downstream task performance. We further evaluate these methods on a different species (mice) to measure their generalizability. Both methods experimentally resulted in good signal recovery performance, but only the images super-resolved by BiDA were accurately skullstripped downstream. Although both methods performed well on the in-domain rat data, BiDA did not fully generalize to the out-of-domain mouse data.