Enhancing hospital discharge summary writing skills: a pilot study on a competency-based training model.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2025-12-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20928.1
Marvin Man Ting Chung, Felix Leung, Gabriel Ching Ngai Leung, Anderson Siu Ming Leung
{"title":"Enhancing hospital discharge summary writing skills: a pilot study on a competency-based training model.","authors":"Marvin Man Ting Chung, Felix Leung, Gabriel Ching Ngai Leung, Anderson Siu Ming Leung","doi":"10.12688/mep.20928.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discharge summary (DS) is an essential clinical document for hospitalized patients. Writing effective DS is a core competency of intern doctors upon entering clinical practice. However, this skill is often underdeveloped due to its exclusion from most medical school curricula, resulting in suboptimal DS quality and communication breakdowns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a one-day, in-person DS writing workshop in June 2025 for 58 final year medical students prior to hospital internship. The workshop comprised of pre-workshop assessments, didactic lectures on DS writing skills, small-group appraisals, and post-workshop assessments with tutor feedback. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed participants' perceptions of DS writing and workshop effectiveness using a 5-point Likert scale. DS samples from pre- and post-workshop assessments were graded by three blinded specialist doctors using a 10-component rubric (maximum score: 30, 3 in each component).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>98.2% of participants agreed that the workshop improved their DS writing skills and would recommend it to others. Survey reponses showed significant post-workshop improvements in understanding purposes and structure of DS (p<0.001), the requirements for an effective DS (p<0.001), confidence in writing an effective DS (p<0.001), and completing it within 10 minutes (p=0.002). Objective assessment scores also improved significantly across most DS key components and for the total score (20.53 ± 2.86 vs 15.54 ± 3.86, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report in the literature describing a DS writing educational intervention for orthopedics, as previous reports focused mainly on internal medicine and were not tailored to the specifics of an orthopedic or surgical admission such as procedures, complications, and post-operative instructions. This pilot program improved students' performance and confidence in DS writing. It highlights the importance in incorporating competency-based, hands-on DS training as a routine component in medical education to better prepare interns for inpatient clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"15 ","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12800595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20928.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Discharge summary (DS) is an essential clinical document for hospitalized patients. Writing effective DS is a core competency of intern doctors upon entering clinical practice. However, this skill is often underdeveloped due to its exclusion from most medical school curricula, resulting in suboptimal DS quality and communication breakdowns.

Methods: We conducted a one-day, in-person DS writing workshop in June 2025 for 58 final year medical students prior to hospital internship. The workshop comprised of pre-workshop assessments, didactic lectures on DS writing skills, small-group appraisals, and post-workshop assessments with tutor feedback. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed participants' perceptions of DS writing and workshop effectiveness using a 5-point Likert scale. DS samples from pre- and post-workshop assessments were graded by three blinded specialist doctors using a 10-component rubric (maximum score: 30, 3 in each component).

Results: 98.2% of participants agreed that the workshop improved their DS writing skills and would recommend it to others. Survey reponses showed significant post-workshop improvements in understanding purposes and structure of DS (p<0.001), the requirements for an effective DS (p<0.001), confidence in writing an effective DS (p<0.001), and completing it within 10 minutes (p=0.002). Objective assessment scores also improved significantly across most DS key components and for the total score (20.53 ± 2.86 vs 15.54 ± 3.86, p<0.001).

Conclusions: This is the first report in the literature describing a DS writing educational intervention for orthopedics, as previous reports focused mainly on internal medicine and were not tailored to the specifics of an orthopedic or surgical admission such as procedures, complications, and post-operative instructions. This pilot program improved students' performance and confidence in DS writing. It highlights the importance in incorporating competency-based, hands-on DS training as a routine component in medical education to better prepare interns for inpatient clinical practice.

提高出院总结写作技能:基于能力的培训模式的试点研究。
背景:出院总结(DS)是住院患者必不可少的临床资料。撰写有效的病历是实习医生进入临床的核心能力。然而,由于这项技能被排除在大多数医学院的课程之外,这项技能往往不发达,导致DS质量不佳和沟通中断。方法:我们于2025年6月对58名即将在医院实习的最后一年级医学生进行了为期一天的面对面DS写作研讨会。工作坊包括工作坊前的评估、DS写作技巧的教学讲座、小组评估和工作坊后的导师反馈评估。研讨会前后的调查评估了参与者对DS写作和研讨会有效性的看法,使用5点李克特量表。来自研讨会前和研讨会后评估的DS样本由三名盲法专科医生使用10分制评分(每个分制的最高分数为30,3分)。结果:98.2%的参与者认为工作坊提高了他们的DS写作技巧,并会推荐给其他人。调查结果显示,研讨会后对DS的目的和结构的理解有了显著的提高(结论:这是文献中第一篇描述骨科DS写作教育干预的报告,因为以前的报告主要集中在内科,而不是针对骨科或外科入院的具体情况,如程序、并发症和术后指示。)这个试点项目提高了学生在DS写作方面的表现和信心。它强调了将以能力为基础的实践培训纳入医学教育的常规组成部分的重要性,以更好地为住院临床实践做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书