Striving toward quality metrics for pediatric stroke: time from door to diagnosis.

IF 1.2
Frontiers in stroke Pub Date : 2026-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fstro.2025.1718355
Rachel Pearson, Nancy K Hills, Kellie Bacon, Shelby K Shelton, Rowena Roque, Tatiana Moreno, Maria Kuchherzki, Carl Schultz, Theodore W Heyming, Christine K Fox, Heather J Fullerton
{"title":"Striving toward quality metrics for pediatric stroke: time from door to diagnosis.","authors":"Rachel Pearson, Nancy K Hills, Kellie Bacon, Shelby K Shelton, Rowena Roque, Tatiana Moreno, Maria Kuchherzki, Carl Schultz, Theodore W Heyming, Christine K Fox, Heather J Fullerton","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2025.1718355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Most pediatric stroke survivors suffer long-term impairments. To minimize injury, it is essential to quickly restore perfusion to viable brain tissue. Minimizing the time to stroke diagnosis requires recognition of a possible stroke by prehospital and emergency healthcare personnel, and rapid neuroimaging. While CT suffices for diagnosing hemorrhagic stroke, MRI is necessary to diagnose acute ischemic stroke (IS), contributing to significant diagnostic delays and potentially missed opportunities for intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of children 1-14 years old with acute neurological symptoms presenting by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the study institution from 1/2019-6/2023. We described patient characteristics and neuroimaging studies, then evaluated predictors of MRI acquisition and actionable findings, including stroke. To assess the generalizability of these data we analyzed a secondary retrospective cohort of all children admitted during this period with out-of-hospital strokes regardless of presentation modality [EMS, emergency department (ED) walk-in, and transfer].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,888 pediatric patients with acute neurological symptoms presenting via EMS, 695 (17.9%) had neuroimaging: CT only in 570 patients (14.7%); CT and MRI in 125 (3.2%). Median (IQR) times from EMS activation to neuroimaging were 2.29 (1.56, 3.21) hours for CT and 26.8 (16.3, 43.8) hours for MRI. An EMS primary impression of \"stroke\" was rare (<i>n</i> = 13) but strongly predictive of imaging acquisition: all had CT and 11 had MRI. Thirty-one of the 125 patients with MRI had actionable MRIs, including nine acute strokes. During the study period another 14 stroke patients presented as ED walk-ins. Median time from ED arrival to CT was 0.92 (0.47, 1.08) hours for EMS patients with hemorrhagic stroke and 5.69 (1.50, 9.76) hours for walk-ins; for MRI, median time was 4.15 (3.00, 5.31) hours for EMS patients with ischemic stroke and 10.2 (1.99, 36.3) hours for walk-ins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among children with acute neurological symptoms selected for neuroimaging, CT was the most common modality while MRIs were performed with a substantial time delay. While EMS providers rarely suspected stroke, their diagnosis impacted imaging decisions in the ED, suggesting a need to raise awareness among prehospital providers. To measure quality improvement in pediatric stroke, new pediatric-specific metrics like \"door to diagnosis\" time, should be further explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":73108,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in stroke","volume":"4 ","pages":"1718355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2025.1718355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Most pediatric stroke survivors suffer long-term impairments. To minimize injury, it is essential to quickly restore perfusion to viable brain tissue. Minimizing the time to stroke diagnosis requires recognition of a possible stroke by prehospital and emergency healthcare personnel, and rapid neuroimaging. While CT suffices for diagnosing hemorrhagic stroke, MRI is necessary to diagnose acute ischemic stroke (IS), contributing to significant diagnostic delays and potentially missed opportunities for intervention.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of children 1-14 years old with acute neurological symptoms presenting by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the study institution from 1/2019-6/2023. We described patient characteristics and neuroimaging studies, then evaluated predictors of MRI acquisition and actionable findings, including stroke. To assess the generalizability of these data we analyzed a secondary retrospective cohort of all children admitted during this period with out-of-hospital strokes regardless of presentation modality [EMS, emergency department (ED) walk-in, and transfer].

Results: Among 3,888 pediatric patients with acute neurological symptoms presenting via EMS, 695 (17.9%) had neuroimaging: CT only in 570 patients (14.7%); CT and MRI in 125 (3.2%). Median (IQR) times from EMS activation to neuroimaging were 2.29 (1.56, 3.21) hours for CT and 26.8 (16.3, 43.8) hours for MRI. An EMS primary impression of "stroke" was rare (n = 13) but strongly predictive of imaging acquisition: all had CT and 11 had MRI. Thirty-one of the 125 patients with MRI had actionable MRIs, including nine acute strokes. During the study period another 14 stroke patients presented as ED walk-ins. Median time from ED arrival to CT was 0.92 (0.47, 1.08) hours for EMS patients with hemorrhagic stroke and 5.69 (1.50, 9.76) hours for walk-ins; for MRI, median time was 4.15 (3.00, 5.31) hours for EMS patients with ischemic stroke and 10.2 (1.99, 36.3) hours for walk-ins.

Conclusion: Among children with acute neurological symptoms selected for neuroimaging, CT was the most common modality while MRIs were performed with a substantial time delay. While EMS providers rarely suspected stroke, their diagnosis impacted imaging decisions in the ED, suggesting a need to raise awareness among prehospital providers. To measure quality improvement in pediatric stroke, new pediatric-specific metrics like "door to diagnosis" time, should be further explored.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

努力实现儿科中风的质量指标:从门到诊断的时间。
背景/目的:大多数儿童中风幸存者患有长期损伤。为了尽量减少损伤,必须迅速恢复活体脑组织的灌注。最小化中风诊断时间需要院前和急诊医护人员识别可能的中风,以及快速的神经成像。虽然CT足以诊断出血性中风,但MRI对于诊断急性缺血性中风(is)是必要的,这导致了严重的诊断延误,并可能错过干预机会。方法:我们对2019年1月至2023年6月至研究机构急诊医疗服务(EMS)就诊的1-14岁急性神经系统症状儿童进行回顾性研究。我们描述了患者特征和神经影像学研究,然后评估了MRI采集的预测因素和可操作的发现,包括中风。为了评估这些数据的普遍性,我们分析了在此期间入院的所有院外卒中儿童的二级回顾性队列,无论其表现方式如何[EMS,急诊(ED)直接就诊和转院]。结果:在3,888例通过EMS出现急性神经系统症状的儿童患者中,695例(17.9%)进行了神经影像学检查;570例(14.7%)患者仅进行了CT检查;CT和MRI 125例(3.2%)。从EMS激活到神经成像的中位(IQR)时间CT为2.29(1.56,3.21)小时,MRI为26.8(16.3,43.8)小时。EMS对“中风”的初步印象很少见(n = 13),但对成像获取有很强的预测性:所有人都有CT检查,11人有MRI检查。125例MRI患者中有31例具有可操作的MRI,包括9例急性中风。在研究期间,另有14名中风患者作为急诊科门诊就诊。出血性脑卒中EMS患者从急诊科到达CT的中位时间为0.92(0.47,1.08)小时,无预约患者为5.69(1.50,9.76)小时;MRI中位时间EMS合并缺血性卒中患者为4.15(3.00,5.31)小时,walk-in患者为10.2(1.99,36.3)小时。结论:在选择进行神经影像学检查的有急性神经症状的儿童中,CT是最常见的方式,而mri则有相当长的时间延迟。虽然EMS提供者很少怀疑中风,但他们的诊断影响了急诊科的成像决策,这表明需要提高院前提供者的意识。为了衡量儿科卒中的质量改善,应该进一步探索新的儿科特定指标,如“诊断之门”时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书