Australian Community Health and Primary Health Care Policies from 1970s to 2020s: A Policy Analysis of Changing Interpretations.

IF 2.2 0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Helen van Eyk, Toby Freeman, Connie Musolino, Denise Fry, Colin McDougall, Tony McBride, Virginia Lewis, Fran Baum
{"title":"Australian Community Health and Primary Health Care Policies from 1970s to 2020s: A Policy Analysis of Changing Interpretations.","authors":"Helen van Eyk, Toby Freeman, Connie Musolino, Denise Fry, Colin McDougall, Tony McBride, Virginia Lewis, Fran Baum","doi":"10.1177/27551938251411284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community health and primary health care (PHC) concepts are contested globally. We analysed 122 Australian federal and state government policy documents relating to women's, Aboriginal community controlled, generalist and workers' community health services from the 1970s to 2022 using institutional theory to understand how ideas and interests had shaped community health and PHC in Australia. We found an initial flourishing of diverse ideas was contested and constrained over time to reflect a more biomedical, general practice-centric approach to PHC. This was influenced by federal government decisions to prioritise general practice, and state governments' emphasis on reducing hospital costs. This reflects the power of established institutions and biomedical framings that have constrained debate over what is possible and what practices can be considered. From the content of the policies we reviewed, community health ideas and a comprehensive vision of PHC have persisted in Aboriginal community controlled health services, in women's health policy, and in Victorian community health services. Since pursuing comprehensive PHC remains a vital global goal to improve population health and health equity, our examination of policy history can shed light on how ideas and interests have shaped community health and PHC, and how future policies could be strengthened.</p>","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":" ","pages":"566-579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938251411284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community health and primary health care (PHC) concepts are contested globally. We analysed 122 Australian federal and state government policy documents relating to women's, Aboriginal community controlled, generalist and workers' community health services from the 1970s to 2022 using institutional theory to understand how ideas and interests had shaped community health and PHC in Australia. We found an initial flourishing of diverse ideas was contested and constrained over time to reflect a more biomedical, general practice-centric approach to PHC. This was influenced by federal government decisions to prioritise general practice, and state governments' emphasis on reducing hospital costs. This reflects the power of established institutions and biomedical framings that have constrained debate over what is possible and what practices can be considered. From the content of the policies we reviewed, community health ideas and a comprehensive vision of PHC have persisted in Aboriginal community controlled health services, in women's health policy, and in Victorian community health services. Since pursuing comprehensive PHC remains a vital global goal to improve population health and health equity, our examination of policy history can shed light on how ideas and interests have shaped community health and PHC, and how future policies could be strengthened.

20世纪70年代至20世纪20年代的澳大利亚社区卫生和初级卫生保健政策:不断变化的解释的政策分析。
社区卫生和初级卫生保健(PHC)概念在全球存在争议。我们分析了122澳大利亚联邦和州政府政策文件有关妇女,土著社区控制,通才和工人的社区卫生服务,从20世纪70年代到2022年,使用制度理论来了解思想和利益如何塑造了澳大利亚的社区卫生和初级保健。我们发现,随着时间的推移,各种想法的最初繁荣受到了质疑和限制,以反映出一种更加生物医学的、以全科实践为中心的初级保健方法。这是受到联邦政府决定优先考虑全科医疗和州政府强调降低医院成本的影响。这反映了既定机构和生物医学框架的力量,它们限制了关于什么是可能的、什么是可以考虑的做法的辩论。从我们审查的政策内容来看,社区保健理念和初级保健的全面愿景在土著社区控制的保健服务、妇女保健政策和维多利亚州社区保健服务中得到了贯彻。由于追求全面的初级保健仍然是改善人口健康和卫生公平的重要全球目标,我们对政策历史的研究可以揭示思想和利益如何影响社区卫生和初级保健,以及如何加强未来的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书