Comparison of admitting neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio with baseline NIH stroke scale score in discriminating poor 30-day stroke outcome among Nigerian Africans.

IF 1.2
Frontiers in stroke Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fstro.2025.1562048
Oladotun V Olalusi, Joseph Yaria, Akintomiwa Makanjuola, Rufus Akinyemi, Mayowa Owolabi, Adesola Ogunniyi
{"title":"Comparison of admitting neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio with baseline NIH stroke scale score in discriminating poor 30-day stroke outcome among Nigerian Africans.","authors":"Oladotun V Olalusi, Joseph Yaria, Akintomiwa Makanjuola, Rufus Akinyemi, Mayowa Owolabi, Adesola Ogunniyi","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2025.1562048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score is an established marker of stroke severity. Its use is time-consuming and requires formal training for optimal results. In contrast, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), known to be independently associated with stroke outcome, can be readily calculated from routine peripheral blood counts with minimal training. We hypothesized that the NLR may perform similarly to the NIHSS score, in discriminating persons with poor 30-day stroke outcome, in a low-resource setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed up 106 participants with clinico-radiologic diagnosis of first-ever acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Patients with clinico-laboratory features of fever, aspiration pneumonia, sepsis, or infection were excluded at baseline. The NLR was obtained at admission while the functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at day 30. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and Cox proportional hazards were used to determine the discriminatory ability of the NLR compared with the NIHSS score in identifying patients with poor 30-day stroke outcome (mRS > 3). The respective areas under the curves (AUC) and HRs (95%CI) were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median interquartile range (IQR) NLR of the study population was 2.87 (3.0). Patients in the higher tertiles of NLR had higher mean standard deviation 30-day mRS scores of 4.9 (1.2) compared to the middle 3.3 (1.2) and lower tertiles 2.3 (1.2) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Admitting NLR had an AUC (95% CI) of 0.83 (0.75-0.91) and HR (95%CI) of 1.19 (1.01-1.40) compared to admitting NIHSS score with AUC of 0.89 (0.84-0.95) and HR of 1.25 (1.14-1.37) in discriminating poor 30-day outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NLR alone performed similarly to the NIHSS score and may help identify patients with adverse 30-day AIS outcome in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73108,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in stroke","volume":"4 ","pages":"1562048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2025.1562048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score is an established marker of stroke severity. Its use is time-consuming and requires formal training for optimal results. In contrast, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), known to be independently associated with stroke outcome, can be readily calculated from routine peripheral blood counts with minimal training. We hypothesized that the NLR may perform similarly to the NIHSS score, in discriminating persons with poor 30-day stroke outcome, in a low-resource setting.

Methods: We followed up 106 participants with clinico-radiologic diagnosis of first-ever acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Patients with clinico-laboratory features of fever, aspiration pneumonia, sepsis, or infection were excluded at baseline. The NLR was obtained at admission while the functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at day 30. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and Cox proportional hazards were used to determine the discriminatory ability of the NLR compared with the NIHSS score in identifying patients with poor 30-day stroke outcome (mRS > 3). The respective areas under the curves (AUC) and HRs (95%CI) were documented.

Results: The median interquartile range (IQR) NLR of the study population was 2.87 (3.0). Patients in the higher tertiles of NLR had higher mean standard deviation 30-day mRS scores of 4.9 (1.2) compared to the middle 3.3 (1.2) and lower tertiles 2.3 (1.2) (p < 0.001). Admitting NLR had an AUC (95% CI) of 0.83 (0.75-0.91) and HR (95%CI) of 1.19 (1.01-1.40) compared to admitting NIHSS score with AUC of 0.89 (0.84-0.95) and HR of 1.25 (1.14-1.37) in discriminating poor 30-day outcome.

Conclusion: The NLR alone performed similarly to the NIHSS score and may help identify patients with adverse 30-day AIS outcome in low-resource settings.

Abstract Image

入院中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率与基线NIH卒中量表评分在尼日利亚非洲人中区分30天卒中预后差的比较
目的:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分是卒中严重程度的既定标志。它的使用是耗时的,需要正式的培训才能达到最佳效果。相比之下,中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR),已知与中风预后独立相关,可以很容易地从常规外周血计数中计算出来,只需最少的训练。我们假设,在低资源环境下,NLR在区分30天卒中预后差的患者方面可能与NIHSS评分相似。方法:对106例首次诊断为急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的患者进行临床影像学随访。有发热、吸入性肺炎、败血症或感染等临床-实验室特征的患者在基线时被排除。入院时获得NLR,第30天使用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分评估功能结果。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和Cox比例风险来确定NLR与NIHSS评分在识别30天卒中预后不良患者方面的区分能力(mRS bbbb3)。分别记录曲线下面积(AUC)和hr (95%CI)。结果:研究人群的中位四分位数范围(IQR) NLR为2.87(3.0)。NLR高三分位数患者的平均标准偏差30天mRS评分为4.9(1.2),高于中三分位数3.3(1.2)和低三分位数2.3 (1.2)(p < 0.001)。与NIHSS评分相比,NLR评分的AUC (95%CI)为0.83 (0.75 ~ 0.91),HR (95%CI)为1.19(1.01 ~ 1.40),而NIHSS评分的AUC为0.89 (0.84 ~ 0.95),HR为1.25(1.14 ~ 1.37)。结论:NLR单独表现与NIHSS评分相似,可能有助于在低资源环境中识别不良30天AIS结果的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书