Assessment of language and executive functions in ALS: the brief executive Language screen.

IF 2.8
Gail A Robinson, Mia R Phillips, Kristina Horne, Amelia Ceslis, Pamela A McCombe, Robert D Henderson
{"title":"Assessment of language and executive functions in ALS: the brief executive Language screen.","authors":"Gail A Robinson, Mia R Phillips, Kristina Horne, Amelia Ceslis, Pamela A McCombe, Robert D Henderson","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2607398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: Language and executive functioning are two domains commonly impacted in ALS and should be assessed sensitively and briefly. This paper investigates the utility of the Brief Executive Language Screen (BELS) in ALS. <i>Methods</i>: ALS patients (<i>N</i> = 27) were compared to age, education, and pre-morbid intelligence-matched healthy controls (<i>N</i> = 91) at the group level using ANCOVA and t-tests. A case series was also conducted to explore individual and subgroup performance on the BELS and Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). <i>Results</i>: Groups were largely matched on neuropsychology baseline measures. The ALS group performed significantly worse on BELS Propositional Language and Executive Function subtests, and on overall BELS scores. Group results suggest setting a goal can increase phonemic fluency and spontaneous speech output, after controlling for motor speed. The case series revealed almost half of patients (across all subgroups) were impaired on the BELS, compared to 15% impaired on the ECAS (patients on the more severe end of the ALS-FTD spectrum). <i>Conclusions</i>: The BELS rapidly assesses language and executive functions, and provides valuable information for management of cognitive difficulties (i.e., goal setting), which can help improve or maintain conversational speech. The BELS may help to identify subtle impairments that may otherwise go undetected.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"641-651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2607398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Language and executive functioning are two domains commonly impacted in ALS and should be assessed sensitively and briefly. This paper investigates the utility of the Brief Executive Language Screen (BELS) in ALS. Methods: ALS patients (N = 27) were compared to age, education, and pre-morbid intelligence-matched healthy controls (N = 91) at the group level using ANCOVA and t-tests. A case series was also conducted to explore individual and subgroup performance on the BELS and Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Results: Groups were largely matched on neuropsychology baseline measures. The ALS group performed significantly worse on BELS Propositional Language and Executive Function subtests, and on overall BELS scores. Group results suggest setting a goal can increase phonemic fluency and spontaneous speech output, after controlling for motor speed. The case series revealed almost half of patients (across all subgroups) were impaired on the BELS, compared to 15% impaired on the ECAS (patients on the more severe end of the ALS-FTD spectrum). Conclusions: The BELS rapidly assesses language and executive functions, and provides valuable information for management of cognitive difficulties (i.e., goal setting), which can help improve or maintain conversational speech. The BELS may help to identify subtle impairments that may otherwise go undetected.

ALS患者语言和执行功能的评估:简短的执行语言屏幕。
目的:语言和执行功能是ALS患者常受影响的两个领域,应敏感而简短地评估。本文探讨了简要执行语言筛选(BELS)在渐冻症中的应用。方法:采用ANCOVA和t检验,在组水平上将27例ALS患者与年龄、受教育程度和病前智力匹配的健康对照(N = 91)进行比较。还进行了一系列病例研究,以探讨个人和亚组在bel和爱丁堡认知和行为ALS筛查(ECAS)中的表现。结果:各组在神经心理学基线测量上基本匹配。ALS组在BELS命题语言和执行功能子测试以及总体BELS得分上表现明显较差。小组研究结果表明,在控制运动速度后,设定目标可以提高音素流畅性和自发语言输出。病例系列显示,几乎一半的患者(所有亚组)在BELS上受损,相比之下,15%的患者在ECAS上受损(ALS-FTD谱系中较严重的一端)。结论:BELS快速评估语言和执行功能,并为管理认知困难(即目标设定)提供有价值的信息,这可以帮助改善或维持会话语言。BELS可以帮助识别细微的损伤,否则这些损伤可能不会被发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书