Federal Look-Alike Plan Termination Policy and Dual-Eligible Enrollment in Integrated Care Programs.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yanlei Ma, Eric T Roberts, Jessica Phelan, Kenton J Johnston, E John Orav, Ellen R Meara, Jose F Figueroa
{"title":"Federal Look-Alike Plan Termination Policy and Dual-Eligible Enrollment in Integrated Care Programs.","authors":"Yanlei Ma, Eric T Roberts, Jessica Phelan, Kenton J Johnston, E John Orav, Ellen R Meara, Jose F Figueroa","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.6294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>In 2023, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services terminated dual-eligible special needs plan look-alikes-Medicare Advantage plans with beneficiary panels composed of more than 80% dual-eligible individuals but lacking Medicaid integration. Understanding whether this policy promoted dual-eligible enrollment in integrated care plans, particularly those attaining high-level integration, is critical.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe dual-eligible enrollment transitions after the look-alike plan termination and evaluate whether the policy was associated with increased enrollment in highly integrated plans.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed US Medicare administrative data from January 2017 to January 2023. Samples were limited to full-benefit dual-eligible beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>First, a beneficiary-level analysis was conducted on 2023 enrollment patterns among full-benefit dual-eligible individuals whose 2022 plans were terminated, including factors associated with enrollment in highly integrated plans in 2023. Next, a county-year-level difference-in-differences design was used to compare changes in full-benefit dual-eligible enrollment before (2017-2022) and after (2023) the termination policy between counties with vs without terminated look-alike plans. A difference-in-differences design was used to evaluate whether the look-alike termination policy was associated with the proportion of full-benefit dual-eligible individuals enrolled in highly integrated care plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2022, 482 of 2576 counties had full-benefit dual-eligible individuals enrolled in look-alike plans for at least 1 year. Of the 170 399 full-benefit dual-eligible individuals enrolled in look-alike plans in 2022 (58.9% female; 20.6% Asian, 44.8% Hispanic, 11.3% non-Hispanic Black, 21.4% non-Hispanic White, and 2% other) and remained dual-eligible in 2023, only 5.4% transitioned to highly integrated plans, while 55.6% moved to nonintegrated plans. Dual-eligible individuals transitioning to highly integrated plans were more likely to be older (65-74 years: adjusted difference, 3.4 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, 2.8-4.1 pp; 75-84 years: adjusted difference, 4.1 pp; 95% CI, 3.3-4.8 pp; ≥85 years: adjusted difference, 5.0 pp; 95% CI, 4.0-5.9 pp), female (adjusted difference: 0.6 pp; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9 pp), without disabilities (adjusted difference, -0.7 pp; 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.2 pp), and less likely to be Asian (adjusted difference, -5.0 pp; 95% CI, -5.6 to -4.4 pp) or Black (adjusted difference, -0.9 pp; 95% CI, -1.6 to -0.2 pp). The termination policy was not associated with a significant differential increase in enrollment into highly integrated plans in counties with look-alike plans compared with those without (0.6 pp; 95% CI, -0.4 to 1.6 pp). However, there was a 2.6-pp differential increase (95% CI, 0.01-5.1 pp) in enrollment into plans offering some integration, primarily driven by enrollment growth in plans with lower levels of integration. Enrollment also increased in conventional Medicare Advantage plans with fewer than 80% of dual-eligible enrollees (2.6 pp; 95% CI, 0.7-4.5 pp) after the termination policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, the termination of look-alike plans was insufficient to significantly shift dual-eligible individuals toward highly integrated plans. Complementary strategies are necessary to ensure that dual-eligible individuals enroll into highly integrated care models that may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"7 1","pages":"e256294"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.6294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: In 2023, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services terminated dual-eligible special needs plan look-alikes-Medicare Advantage plans with beneficiary panels composed of more than 80% dual-eligible individuals but lacking Medicaid integration. Understanding whether this policy promoted dual-eligible enrollment in integrated care plans, particularly those attaining high-level integration, is critical.

Objective: To describe dual-eligible enrollment transitions after the look-alike plan termination and evaluate whether the policy was associated with increased enrollment in highly integrated plans.

Design, setting, and participants: This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed US Medicare administrative data from January 2017 to January 2023. Samples were limited to full-benefit dual-eligible beneficiaries.

Main outcomes and measures: First, a beneficiary-level analysis was conducted on 2023 enrollment patterns among full-benefit dual-eligible individuals whose 2022 plans were terminated, including factors associated with enrollment in highly integrated plans in 2023. Next, a county-year-level difference-in-differences design was used to compare changes in full-benefit dual-eligible enrollment before (2017-2022) and after (2023) the termination policy between counties with vs without terminated look-alike plans. A difference-in-differences design was used to evaluate whether the look-alike termination policy was associated with the proportion of full-benefit dual-eligible individuals enrolled in highly integrated care plans.

Results: Between 2017 and 2022, 482 of 2576 counties had full-benefit dual-eligible individuals enrolled in look-alike plans for at least 1 year. Of the 170 399 full-benefit dual-eligible individuals enrolled in look-alike plans in 2022 (58.9% female; 20.6% Asian, 44.8% Hispanic, 11.3% non-Hispanic Black, 21.4% non-Hispanic White, and 2% other) and remained dual-eligible in 2023, only 5.4% transitioned to highly integrated plans, while 55.6% moved to nonintegrated plans. Dual-eligible individuals transitioning to highly integrated plans were more likely to be older (65-74 years: adjusted difference, 3.4 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, 2.8-4.1 pp; 75-84 years: adjusted difference, 4.1 pp; 95% CI, 3.3-4.8 pp; ≥85 years: adjusted difference, 5.0 pp; 95% CI, 4.0-5.9 pp), female (adjusted difference: 0.6 pp; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9 pp), without disabilities (adjusted difference, -0.7 pp; 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.2 pp), and less likely to be Asian (adjusted difference, -5.0 pp; 95% CI, -5.6 to -4.4 pp) or Black (adjusted difference, -0.9 pp; 95% CI, -1.6 to -0.2 pp). The termination policy was not associated with a significant differential increase in enrollment into highly integrated plans in counties with look-alike plans compared with those without (0.6 pp; 95% CI, -0.4 to 1.6 pp). However, there was a 2.6-pp differential increase (95% CI, 0.01-5.1 pp) in enrollment into plans offering some integration, primarily driven by enrollment growth in plans with lower levels of integration. Enrollment also increased in conventional Medicare Advantage plans with fewer than 80% of dual-eligible enrollees (2.6 pp; 95% CI, 0.7-4.5 pp) after the termination policy.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, the termination of look-alike plans was insufficient to significantly shift dual-eligible individuals toward highly integrated plans. Complementary strategies are necessary to ensure that dual-eligible individuals enroll into highly integrated care models that may improve outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

联邦相似计划终止政策和综合护理计划的双重资格登记。
重要性:2023年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心终止了类似双重资格特殊需求计划的医疗保险优势计划,该计划的受益人小组由80%以上的双重资格个人组成,但缺乏医疗补助整合。了解这一政策是否促进了综合护理计划的双重资格登记,特别是那些达到高水平整合的人,是至关重要的。目的:描述相似计划终止后的双重登记过渡,并评估该政策是否与高度整合计划的登记增加有关。设计、环境和参与者:这项重复的横断面研究分析了2017年1月至2023年1月的美国医疗保险管理数据。样本仅限于完全受益的双重资格受益人。主要结果和措施:首先,对终止2022年计划的全福利双重资格个人2023年入保模式进行受益水平分析,包括与2023年高整合计划入保相关的因素。接下来,采用县-年水平的差异中差异设计来比较在2017-2022年和2023年终止政策之前(2017-2022年)和之后(2023年)有和没有终止相似计划的县之间的全福利双合格登记的变化。采用差异中差异设计来评估相似终止政策是否与参加高度整合护理计划的完全福利双重资格个人的比例相关。结果:在2017年至2022年期间,2576个县中有482个县有完全受益的双重资格个人参加了至少1年的类似计划。在170 399名完全符合双重资格的个人中,有58.9%的人在2022年参加了类似的计划(58.9%的女性,20.6%的亚裔,44.8%的西班牙裔,11.3%的非西班牙裔黑人,21.4%的非西班牙裔白人,2%的其他),并在2023年仍然符合双重资格,只有5.4%的人过渡到高度整合的计划,而55.6%的人转向了非整合的计划。过渡到高度整合计划的双重符合条件个体更可能是老年人(65-74岁:调整差值,3.4个百分点[pp]; 95% CI, 2.8-4.1 pp; 75-84岁:调整差值,4.1 pp; 95% CI, 3.3-4.8 pp;≥85岁:调整差值,5.0 pp; 95% CI, 4.0-5.9 pp)、女性(调整差值:0.6 pp; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9 pp)、无残疾(调整差值,-0.7 pp; 95% CI, -1.2至-0.2 pp),亚洲人(调整差值,-5.0 pp;95% CI, -5.6至-4.4 pp)或Black(调整差值,-0.9 pp; 95% CI, -1.6至-0.2 pp)。在有相似计划的县,与没有相似计划的县相比,终止政策与加入高度整合计划的显著差异增加无关(0.6 pp; 95% CI, -0.4至1.6 pp)。然而,在整合程度较低的计划中,注册人数增加了2.6个百分点(95% CI, 0.01-5.1个百分点),这主要是由于整合程度较低的计划的注册人数增加所致。传统医疗保险优惠计划的登记人数也有所增加,在终止政策后,双重资格的登记人数少于80% (2.6 pp; 95% CI, 0.7-4.5 pp)。结论和相关性:在本研究中,终止相似的计划不足以显著地将双重符合条件的个人转向高度整合的计划。补充策略是必要的,以确保双重资格的个人注册到可能改善结果的高度整合的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书