To Protest or Not to Protest? Older Israeli Social Activists' Reflections on Protests Post-October 7.

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Liat Ayalon, Sarit Okun, Natalie Ulitsa
{"title":"To Protest or Not to Protest? Older Israeli Social Activists' Reflections on Protests Post-October 7.","authors":"Liat Ayalon, Sarit Okun, Natalie Ulitsa","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2026.2615201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the judicial overhaul enacted by the Israeli government in early 2023, a wave of unprecedented protests surged in the streets. This study aims to understand the experiences of older activists who participated in the initial protests against the judicial overhaul. It explores why some continued protesting, while others disengaged after the October 7 massacre and the subsequent war, using a life course perspective with an emphasis on the concept of linked lives. Between February and May 2025, 22 older activists who had been involved in the initial protests in 2023 were interviewed. Thematic analysis was employed. Results show diverging viewpoints: some activists believe protests remain vital, while others have ceased due to fears of societal division, perceived ineffectiveness, and prioritizing national unity during wartime. Ambivalence was a common thread, especially regarding the legitimacy of protests amid ongoing war. The findings highlight how historical events, personal experiences, and social contexts influence activism. The socioemotional selectivity theory and the concept of linked lives illuminate the reasons behind continued or discontinued protest engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2026.2615201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the judicial overhaul enacted by the Israeli government in early 2023, a wave of unprecedented protests surged in the streets. This study aims to understand the experiences of older activists who participated in the initial protests against the judicial overhaul. It explores why some continued protesting, while others disengaged after the October 7 massacre and the subsequent war, using a life course perspective with an emphasis on the concept of linked lives. Between February and May 2025, 22 older activists who had been involved in the initial protests in 2023 were interviewed. Thematic analysis was employed. Results show diverging viewpoints: some activists believe protests remain vital, while others have ceased due to fears of societal division, perceived ineffectiveness, and prioritizing national unity during wartime. Ambivalence was a common thread, especially regarding the legitimacy of protests amid ongoing war. The findings highlight how historical events, personal experiences, and social contexts influence activism. The socioemotional selectivity theory and the concept of linked lives illuminate the reasons behind continued or discontinued protest engagement.

抗议还是不抗议?年长的以色列社会活动家对10月7日之后抗议活动的反思。
以色列政府于2023年初实施司法改革后,街头爆发了前所未有的抗议浪潮。本研究旨在了解参与最初反对司法改革抗议活动的年长活动人士的经历。它探讨了为什么一些人在10月7日大屠杀和随后的战争后继续抗议,而另一些人则在10月7日大屠杀和随后的战争后离开,使用生命历程的观点,强调生命联系的概念。在2025年2月至5月期间,22名参与了2023年最初抗议活动的年长活动人士接受了采访。采用专题分析。结果显示了不同的观点:一些活动人士认为抗议活动仍然至关重要,而另一些人则由于担心社会分裂、认为效率低下以及在战争期间优先考虑国家团结而停止了抗议活动。矛盾心理是一个共同的线索,尤其是在持续的战争中抗议的合法性问题上。研究结果强调了历史事件、个人经历和社会背景如何影响行动主义。社会情感选择性理论和关联生活的概念阐明了持续或停止抗议活动背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书