Radial tears of the lateral meniscus reduce contact area by 70% and triple condylar stress: A physics-based finite element analysis

IF 3.3 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Horacio Rivarola MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) , Camilo Helito MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) , Cristian Collazo MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) , Marcos Palanconi MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) , Marcos Meninato MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) , Francisco Endara Urresta MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon) , Carlos Peñaherrera-Carrillo MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon) , Alejandro Barros Castro MD (Resident) (Traumatology and Orthopedics Resident) , Bautista Rivarola MD (Physician)
{"title":"Radial tears of the lateral meniscus reduce contact area by 70% and triple condylar stress: A physics-based finite element analysis","authors":"Horacio Rivarola MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) ,&nbsp;Camilo Helito MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) ,&nbsp;Cristian Collazo MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) ,&nbsp;Marcos Palanconi MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) ,&nbsp;Marcos Meninato MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Knee Surgery Specialist) ,&nbsp;Francisco Endara Urresta MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon) ,&nbsp;Carlos Peñaherrera-Carrillo MD (Orthopaedic Surgeon) ,&nbsp;Alejandro Barros Castro MD (Resident) (Traumatology and Orthopedics Resident) ,&nbsp;Bautista Rivarola MD (Physician)","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2026.101066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/objectives</h3><div>Radial tears of the lateral meniscus disrupt the circumferential collagen fibers responsible for converting axial compression into hoop tension. Although their clinical impact is well recognized, the underlying physics of stress redistribution remains poorly quantified and rarely visualized. The objective of this study was to model and mechanically characterize how radial tears alter contact stress distribution using solid-mechanics principles and finite element analysis (FEA), and to determine whether anatomic repair restores hoop-stress continuity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A three-dimensional FEA model of a healthy knee was reconstructed from high-resolution 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Four conditions were simulated under identical loading: intact meniscus, 50% partial radial tear, complete (100%) radial tear, and anatomic repair. A 1000-N axial load was applied with a friction coefficient of 0.02. Primary outcomes included femorotibial contact area, peak contact stress, and qualitative stress-flow continuity, assessed through vector and heat map trajectories. Model performance was validated against published cadaveric and computational benchmarks. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction was used to compare conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The intact meniscus demonstrated uniform stress distribution with a mean contact area of 110 ± 8 mm<sup>2</sup> and peak stress of 1.2 ± 0.2 MPa.</div><div>A 50% radial tear reduced contact area to 80 ± 7 mm<sup>2</sup> (−27%) and increased peak stress to 2.1 ± 0.3 MPa (p &lt; 0.001). A complete radial tear further decreased contact area to 35 ± 6 mm<sup>2</sup> (−68%) and tripled peak stress to 3.3 ± 0.4 MPa (2.8-fold increase; p &lt; 0.001). Anatomic repair restored 86% of baseline contact area (95 ± 7 mm<sup>2</sup>) and normalized peak stress to 1.4 ± 0.3 MPa (p = 0.04 vs. intact; ns for intact vs. repaired). Stress flow analysis showed complete collapse of circumferential tension after full tear, with restoration of hoop-stress continuity following repair. Correlation with experimental benchmarks was strong (r = 0.91).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study quantitatively demonstrates that a radial meniscal tear disrupts circumferential load transmission, converting uniform hoop tension into focal condylar overload according to the fundamental principle that stress equals force divided by area. Finite element analysis showed that loss of circumferential continuity reduces contact area by nearly seventy percent and triples peak stress, whereas anatomic repair restores stress flow and re-establishes near-normal load sharing. These findings provide a physics-based explanation for the mechanical collapse that follows radial tears and reinforce that successful meniscal repair must restore the biomechanics of the hoop.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III – Experimental biomechanics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 101066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775426000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objectives

Radial tears of the lateral meniscus disrupt the circumferential collagen fibers responsible for converting axial compression into hoop tension. Although their clinical impact is well recognized, the underlying physics of stress redistribution remains poorly quantified and rarely visualized. The objective of this study was to model and mechanically characterize how radial tears alter contact stress distribution using solid-mechanics principles and finite element analysis (FEA), and to determine whether anatomic repair restores hoop-stress continuity.

Methods

A three-dimensional FEA model of a healthy knee was reconstructed from high-resolution 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Four conditions were simulated under identical loading: intact meniscus, 50% partial radial tear, complete (100%) radial tear, and anatomic repair. A 1000-N axial load was applied with a friction coefficient of 0.02. Primary outcomes included femorotibial contact area, peak contact stress, and qualitative stress-flow continuity, assessed through vector and heat map trajectories. Model performance was validated against published cadaveric and computational benchmarks. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction was used to compare conditions.

Results

The intact meniscus demonstrated uniform stress distribution with a mean contact area of 110 ± 8 mm2 and peak stress of 1.2 ± 0.2 MPa.
A 50% radial tear reduced contact area to 80 ± 7 mm2 (−27%) and increased peak stress to 2.1 ± 0.3 MPa (p < 0.001). A complete radial tear further decreased contact area to 35 ± 6 mm2 (−68%) and tripled peak stress to 3.3 ± 0.4 MPa (2.8-fold increase; p < 0.001). Anatomic repair restored 86% of baseline contact area (95 ± 7 mm2) and normalized peak stress to 1.4 ± 0.3 MPa (p = 0.04 vs. intact; ns for intact vs. repaired). Stress flow analysis showed complete collapse of circumferential tension after full tear, with restoration of hoop-stress continuity following repair. Correlation with experimental benchmarks was strong (r = 0.91).

Conclusion

This study quantitatively demonstrates that a radial meniscal tear disrupts circumferential load transmission, converting uniform hoop tension into focal condylar overload according to the fundamental principle that stress equals force divided by area. Finite element analysis showed that loss of circumferential continuity reduces contact area by nearly seventy percent and triples peak stress, whereas anatomic repair restores stress flow and re-establishes near-normal load sharing. These findings provide a physics-based explanation for the mechanical collapse that follows radial tears and reinforce that successful meniscal repair must restore the biomechanics of the hoop.

Level of evidence

III – Experimental biomechanics.
外侧半月板径向撕裂减少70%的接触面积和三髁应力:基于物理的有限元分析。
简介/目的:外侧半月板的径向撕裂破坏了负责将轴向压缩转化为环向张力的周向胶原纤维。虽然他们的临床影响是公认的,潜在的物理压力再分配仍然缺乏量化和很少可视化。本研究的目的是利用固体力学原理和有限元分析(FEA)来模拟和机械表征径向撕裂如何改变接触应力分布,并确定解剖修复是否恢复环应力连续性。方法:利用高分辨率3-特斯拉MRI重建健康膝关节三维有限元模型。在相同载荷下模拟四种情况:完整半月板,50%部分径向撕裂,完全(100%)径向撕裂和解剖修复。施加1000-N轴向载荷,摩擦系数为0.02。主要结果包括股胫接触面积、峰值接触应力以及通过矢量和热图轨迹评估的定性应力-流连续性。模型的性能根据公布的尸体和计算基准进行了验证。采用Bonferroni校正的重复测量方差分析比较条件。结果:完整半月板应力分布均匀,平均接触面积为110±8 mm2,峰值应力为1.2±0.2 MPa。50%径向撕裂使接触面积减少到80±7 mm2(-27%),峰值应力增加到2.1±0.3 MPa (p < 0.001)。完全径向撕裂进一步减少接触面积至35±6 mm2(-68%),峰值应力增加两倍至3.3±0.4 MPa(增加2.8倍,p < 0.001)。解剖修复修复了86%的基线接触面积(95±7 mm2),并将峰值应力归一化至1.4±0.3 MPa (p = 0.04 vs完整;ns为完整vs修复)。应力流动分析显示,环向张力在完全撕裂后完全崩溃,修复后环向应力连续性恢复。与实验基准相关性强(r = 0.91)。结论:本研究定量地表明,径向半月板撕裂破坏了载荷的周向传递,根据应力等于力除以面积的基本原理,将均匀的环向张力转化为焦点髁过载。有限元分析表明,环向连续性的丧失使接触面积减少了近70%,峰值应力增加了三倍,而解剖修复可以恢复应力流动,并重新建立接近正常的负载共享。这些发现为桡骨撕裂后的机械塌陷提供了基于物理的解释,并强调成功的半月板修复必须恢复环的生物力学。证据等级:III -实验生物力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书