Novel Surrogate Indicators of Intracranial Meningioma Consistency and Outcomes After Resection.

IF 1.4
Yash Akkara, Joshua J Hon, Yesh Meadipudi, Alisha Mahmud, Maaira Khan, Ramesh Nair, Joe M Das
{"title":"Novel Surrogate Indicators of Intracranial Meningioma Consistency and Outcomes After Resection.","authors":"Yash Akkara, Joshua J Hon, Yesh Meadipudi, Alisha Mahmud, Maaira Khan, Ramesh Nair, Joe M Das","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Tumor consistency affects resection and outcomes in meningioma surgery. This study aimed to identify predictors of tumor consistency using the Zada grading scale and assess their association with surgical outcomes and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients aged 18 years and older who underwent intracranial meningioma resection from 2014 to 2024, with ≥1 year of follow-up. Tumors were graded into 5 consistency types per Zada's criteria. Data on demographics, imaging (T2-weighted MRI), histology, and surgical outcomes were collected. Signal intensity ratios between tumor and cortex were calculated. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance, linear regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and Cox regression for progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and fifty-four patients (67.7% female; mean age 58.1) were included. Firmer tumors were associated with longer operative times (492 vs 382.3 minutes for type 4 vs type 2, P < .0001), higher subtotal resection rates (58.6% vs 15%, P < .0001), and increased psammoma body prevalence (17.2% vs 3%, P < .0001). Adherence to surrounding structures correlated with firmness (β = 0.2953, P = .0046). Softer tumors showed higher SI ratios (1.2 vs 0.95, P = .0027), with an area under the curve value of 0.6888. SI thresholds <0.6533 and >1.547 predicted firm and soft tumors with 95% sensitivity respectively. Type 2 tumors had the lowest complication rates (1.56%), whereas type 5 had the highest reoperation rates (33.3%). Firmer tumors were linked to worse PFS ( P = .0247), primarily due to lower resection extent (β = -0.8752, P = .0007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher meningioma consistency is linked to surgical difficulty and poorer PFS. Psammoma bodies, tissue adherence, and SI ratios are promising surrogate markers to guide surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"898-905"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13652121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Tumor consistency affects resection and outcomes in meningioma surgery. This study aimed to identify predictors of tumor consistency using the Zada grading scale and assess their association with surgical outcomes and prognosis.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients aged 18 years and older who underwent intracranial meningioma resection from 2014 to 2024, with ≥1 year of follow-up. Tumors were graded into 5 consistency types per Zada's criteria. Data on demographics, imaging (T2-weighted MRI), histology, and surgical outcomes were collected. Signal intensity ratios between tumor and cortex were calculated. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance, linear regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and Cox regression for progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Five hundred and fifty-four patients (67.7% female; mean age 58.1) were included. Firmer tumors were associated with longer operative times (492 vs 382.3 minutes for type 4 vs type 2, P < .0001), higher subtotal resection rates (58.6% vs 15%, P < .0001), and increased psammoma body prevalence (17.2% vs 3%, P < .0001). Adherence to surrounding structures correlated with firmness (β = 0.2953, P = .0046). Softer tumors showed higher SI ratios (1.2 vs 0.95, P = .0027), with an area under the curve value of 0.6888. SI thresholds <0.6533 and >1.547 predicted firm and soft tumors with 95% sensitivity respectively. Type 2 tumors had the lowest complication rates (1.56%), whereas type 5 had the highest reoperation rates (33.3%). Firmer tumors were linked to worse PFS ( P = .0247), primarily due to lower resection extent (β = -0.8752, P = .0007).

Conclusion: Higher meningioma consistency is linked to surgical difficulty and poorer PFS. Psammoma bodies, tissue adherence, and SI ratios are promising surrogate markers to guide surgical planning.

颅内脑膜瘤一致性和切除后预后的新替代指标。
背景和目的:肿瘤一致性影响脑膜瘤手术的切除和预后。本研究旨在使用Zada分级量表确定肿瘤一致性的预测因素,并评估其与手术结果和预后的关系。方法:回顾性分析2014年至2024年接受颅内脑膜瘤切除术的18岁及以上患者,随访≥1年。根据Zada标准将肿瘤分为5种一致性类型。收集了人口统计学、影像学(t2加权MRI)、组织学和手术结果的数据。计算肿瘤与皮层之间的信号强度比。统计分析包括方差分析、线性回归、受试者工作特征分析和无进展生存期(PFS)的Cox回归。结果:共纳入554例患者,女性67.7%,平均年龄58.1岁。较坚固的肿瘤与较长的手术时间(492分钟vs 382.3分钟,4型vs 2型,P < 0.0001)、较高的次全切除率(58.6% vs 15%, P < 0.0001)和增加的沙粒体患病率(17.2% vs 3%, P < 0.0001)相关。对周围结构的粘附与硬度相关(β = 0.2953, P = 0.0046)。软质肿瘤的SI比值较高(1.2 vs 0.95, P = 0.0027),曲线下面积为0.6888。预测硬瘤和软瘤的SI阈值分别为1.547,敏感性为95%。2型肿瘤并发症发生率最低(1.56%),5型肿瘤再手术率最高(33.3%)。较坚固的肿瘤与较差的PFS相关(P = 0.0247),主要是由于较低的切除范围(β = -0.8752, P = 0.0007)。结论:脑膜瘤一致性越高,手术难度越大,PFS越差。沙粒体、组织粘附性和SI比值是指导手术计划的有希望的替代标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书