Bridging Health Equity, Quality Improvement, and Patient Safety: A Framework for Medical Student Education

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Joyce R. Javier, Anne T. Vo, Gery W. Ryan, Craig W. Robbins, Heidi D. Nelson, Ashwini Lakshmanan
{"title":"Bridging Health Equity, Quality Improvement, and Patient Safety: A Framework for Medical Student Education","authors":"Joyce R. Javier,&nbsp;Anne T. Vo,&nbsp;Gery W. Ryan,&nbsp;Craig W. Robbins,&nbsp;Heidi D. Nelson,&nbsp;Ashwini Lakshmanan","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Ensuring patient safety (PS) and implementing quality improvement (QI) are well-recognized functions of healthcare delivery systems and fall within physicians' scope of practice. How to effectively introduce equity-centered PS and QI concepts into an already overloaded undergraduate medical education curriculum is a challenge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This report describes our experiences at the Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine (KPSOM), a new medical school, and how we have developed our Quality Improvement and Patient Safety curriculum within a larger institutional environment where equity and social justice are highly valued.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating health systems science into undergraduate medical education and concepts related to health equity requires intentional curricular design and ongoing adaptation. Lessons learned include: (1) importance of using the Basic Improvement Framework as an educational anchor; (2) understanding the value of integration across curricular phases; and (3) creating a dedicated space for curricular refinement over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Medical schools and health systems aiming to strengthen their health systems science curricula may find value in implementing structured approaches—such as the Basic Improvement Framework utilized at KPSOM—to promote early and meaningful engagement with systems-based concepts, especially health equity, throughout learners’ training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ensuring patient safety (PS) and implementing quality improvement (QI) are well-recognized functions of healthcare delivery systems and fall within physicians' scope of practice. How to effectively introduce equity-centered PS and QI concepts into an already overloaded undergraduate medical education curriculum is a challenge.

Methods

This report describes our experiences at the Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine (KPSOM), a new medical school, and how we have developed our Quality Improvement and Patient Safety curriculum within a larger institutional environment where equity and social justice are highly valued.

Results

Integrating health systems science into undergraduate medical education and concepts related to health equity requires intentional curricular design and ongoing adaptation. Lessons learned include: (1) importance of using the Basic Improvement Framework as an educational anchor; (2) understanding the value of integration across curricular phases; and (3) creating a dedicated space for curricular refinement over time.

Conclusions

Medical schools and health systems aiming to strengthen their health systems science curricula may find value in implementing structured approaches—such as the Basic Improvement Framework utilized at KPSOM—to promote early and meaningful engagement with systems-based concepts, especially health equity, throughout learners’ training.

Abstract Image

衔接健康公平、质量改善和患者安全:医学生教育框架
背景:确保患者安全(PS)和实施质量改进(QI)是医疗保健服务系统公认的功能,属于医生的实践范围。如何有效地将以公平为中心的PS和QI概念引入已经超负荷的本科医学教育课程是一个挑战。本报告描述了我们在Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson医学院(KPSOM)的经验,这是一所新的医学院,以及我们如何在一个更大的机构环境中发展我们的质量改进和患者安全课程,公平和社会正义是高度重视的。结果将卫生系统科学融入本科医学教育和卫生公平相关概念需要有意识的课程设计和持续的适应。经验教训包括:(1)使用基本改进框架作为教育锚的重要性;(2)理解跨课程阶段整合的价值;(3)随着时间的推移,为课程的完善创造一个专门的空间。旨在加强其卫生系统科学课程的医学院和卫生系统可能会发现实施结构化方法的价值,例如kpsom使用的基本改进框架,以促进学习者在整个培训过程中早期和有意义地参与基于系统的概念,特别是卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书