On the Applicability of Mogi Model to Interpret Displacements on Volcanic Slopes

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
I. A. Panteleev, A. A. Petrushov, V. O. Mikhailov, M. S. Volkova, A. Yu. Izyumova
{"title":"On the Applicability of Mogi Model to Interpret Displacements on Volcanic Slopes","authors":"I. A. Panteleev,&nbsp;A. A. Petrushov,&nbsp;V. O. Mikhailov,&nbsp;M. S. Volkova,&nbsp;A. Yu. Izyumova","doi":"10.1134/S1069351325700867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b>—Analytical and numerical methods for calculating ground surface displacements in isotropic linear elastic medium with a spherical cavity under excess pressure are compared. The comparison is conducted with varying the depth of the spherical cavity for two ground surface geometries: flat and with conical relief of varying inclinations. In the analytical model, a simplified topography approximation is used. The analysis of the discrepancy between the numerical and analytical solutions suggests the necessity to take into account finite size of the deformation source, especially at shallow depths (less than a kilometer) and to use higher-order terms in the small parameter expansion of the solution for a spherical cavity. For a computational domain with steep conical topography, such as that of the Koryakskii Volcano, Kamchatka Peninsula, the discrepancies between the numerical and analytical solutions are more than 30% for vertical displacement and more than 45% for horizontal component with a source depth of 1450 and 3000 m, respectively. These errors are quite large and significantly exceed the typical error of satellite measurements obtained in favorable conditions. Therefore, using the spherical source model combined with approximate topography representation in regions with steep terrain can lead to significant errors. The discrepancies decrease rapidly as the terrain flattens. The locations of the maxima of the displacement vector components relative to the summit of a conical edifice do not coincide in the analytical solution and in the direct numerical calculation. A simplified consideration of the topography may also give a wrong idea of the position of the deformation source relative to the volcano’s summit.</p>","PeriodicalId":602,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","volume":"61 6","pages":"1082 - 1091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1069351325700867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract—Analytical and numerical methods for calculating ground surface displacements in isotropic linear elastic medium with a spherical cavity under excess pressure are compared. The comparison is conducted with varying the depth of the spherical cavity for two ground surface geometries: flat and with conical relief of varying inclinations. In the analytical model, a simplified topography approximation is used. The analysis of the discrepancy between the numerical and analytical solutions suggests the necessity to take into account finite size of the deformation source, especially at shallow depths (less than a kilometer) and to use higher-order terms in the small parameter expansion of the solution for a spherical cavity. For a computational domain with steep conical topography, such as that of the Koryakskii Volcano, Kamchatka Peninsula, the discrepancies between the numerical and analytical solutions are more than 30% for vertical displacement and more than 45% for horizontal component with a source depth of 1450 and 3000 m, respectively. These errors are quite large and significantly exceed the typical error of satellite measurements obtained in favorable conditions. Therefore, using the spherical source model combined with approximate topography representation in regions with steep terrain can lead to significant errors. The discrepancies decrease rapidly as the terrain flattens. The locations of the maxima of the displacement vector components relative to the summit of a conical edifice do not coincide in the analytical solution and in the direct numerical calculation. A simplified consideration of the topography may also give a wrong idea of the position of the deformation source relative to the volcano’s summit.

Abstract Image

Mogi模型解释火山斜坡位移的适用性研究
摘要:比较了各向同性球面空腔线弹性介质在超压作用下地表位移的解析和数值计算方法。对平面和不同倾角的圆锥地形两种地表几何形状进行了球面空腔深度变化的比较。在解析模型中,采用了简化的地形近似。数值解与解析解之间的差异分析表明,有必要考虑变形源的有限尺寸,特别是在浅深度(小于1公里),并在球面空腔解的小参数展开中使用高阶项。对于具有陡峭锥形地形的计算域,如堪察加半岛Koryakskii火山,在震源深度为1450 m和3000 m时,垂直分量的数值解与解析解的差异大于30%,水平分量的数值解与解析解的差异大于45%。这些误差相当大,大大超过在有利条件下卫星测量的典型误差。因此,在地形陡峭的地区使用球面源模型结合近似地形表示会导致较大的误差。随着地形变平,差异迅速减小。在解析解和直接数值计算中,位移矢量分量的最大值相对于圆锥大厦顶点的位置并不重合。对地形的简化考虑也可能对形变源相对于火山顶的位置产生错误的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
30.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes results of original theoretical and experimental research in relevant areas of the physics of the Earth''s interior and applied geophysics. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书