Exploring the prevalence, forms, risk factors, and interventions associated with violence against children in alternative care settings: A scoping review

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Children and Youth Services Review Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108766
Justin Rogers , Susie Wilson , Jen Dixon
{"title":"Exploring the prevalence, forms, risk factors, and interventions associated with violence against children in alternative care settings: A scoping review","authors":"Justin Rogers ,&nbsp;Susie Wilson ,&nbsp;Jen Dixon","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Violence against children (VAC) in alternative care settings, including foster care, residential care, and kinship care, is a significant global concern. This scoping review synthesises evidence from 77 studies published between 2014 and 2024 across high, middle, and low-income contexts, examining the forms, risk factors, consequences, protective features, and interventions associated with violence in care. In line with PRISMA-ScR guidance, the review maps patterns in the evidence base but does not estimate pooled prevalence across settings.</div><div>Neglect was the most frequently reported form of maltreatment, often linked to poverty and limited external support, including in some informal kinship care contexts. Residential settings were commonly associated with reports of physical abuse and peer violence, while findings on sexual abuse varied across contexts. Emotional abuse was reported in all care settings.</div><div>Identified risk factors included placement instability, inadequate caregiver support, poverty, and prior exposure to violence. Reported consequences ranged from poor mental health and disrupted relationships to heightened risks of revictimisation. Evidence on effective interventions was sparse, although supportive caregiver–child relationships and trauma-informed models were noted as protective.</div><div>Important gaps remain in longitudinal and disaggregated evidence, particularly in lowand middle-income contexts and with respect to peer violence, children with disabilities, and LGBTQI + youth. While this review focuses on violence, it is essential to caution that many children experience alternative care as protective and nurturing, and our findings should not be interpreted as suggesting that all care arrangements are harmful. Strengthening family-based care, ensuring robust oversight, embedding protective, child-centred practices, and prioritising reintegration where possible are critical to reducing risks and promoting children’s well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 108766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926000198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Violence against children (VAC) in alternative care settings, including foster care, residential care, and kinship care, is a significant global concern. This scoping review synthesises evidence from 77 studies published between 2014 and 2024 across high, middle, and low-income contexts, examining the forms, risk factors, consequences, protective features, and interventions associated with violence in care. In line with PRISMA-ScR guidance, the review maps patterns in the evidence base but does not estimate pooled prevalence across settings.
Neglect was the most frequently reported form of maltreatment, often linked to poverty and limited external support, including in some informal kinship care contexts. Residential settings were commonly associated with reports of physical abuse and peer violence, while findings on sexual abuse varied across contexts. Emotional abuse was reported in all care settings.
Identified risk factors included placement instability, inadequate caregiver support, poverty, and prior exposure to violence. Reported consequences ranged from poor mental health and disrupted relationships to heightened risks of revictimisation. Evidence on effective interventions was sparse, although supportive caregiver–child relationships and trauma-informed models were noted as protective.
Important gaps remain in longitudinal and disaggregated evidence, particularly in lowand middle-income contexts and with respect to peer violence, children with disabilities, and LGBTQI + youth. While this review focuses on violence, it is essential to caution that many children experience alternative care as protective and nurturing, and our findings should not be interpreted as suggesting that all care arrangements are harmful. Strengthening family-based care, ensuring robust oversight, embedding protective, child-centred practices, and prioritising reintegration where possible are critical to reducing risks and promoting children’s well-being.
探讨替代照料环境中与暴力侵害儿童行为有关的流行程度、形式、风险因素和干预措施:范围审查
在替代照料环境(包括寄养、寄宿照料和亲属照料)中对儿童的暴力行为是全球关注的一个重大问题。本范围审查综合了2014年至2024年期间在高、中、低收入背景下发表的77项研究的证据,审查了与护理中暴力相关的形式、风险因素、后果、保护特征和干预措施。与PRISMA-ScR指南一致,该综述绘制了证据库中的模式图,但没有估计不同环境下的总患病率。忽视是最常见的虐待形式,往往与贫穷和有限的外部支持有关,包括在一些非正式的亲属照料环境中。居住环境通常与身体虐待和同伴暴力的报告有关,而关于性虐待的调查结果因环境而异。所有护理机构都报告了精神虐待。确定的风险因素包括安置不稳定、照顾者支持不足、贫困和以前接触过暴力。报告的后果包括精神健康状况不佳和关系破裂,以及再次受害的风险增加。关于有效干预措施的证据很少,尽管支持性的照顾者-儿童关系和创伤知情模式被认为是有保护作用的。纵向和分类证据方面仍然存在重大差距,特别是在低收入和中等收入背景下以及同龄人暴力、残疾儿童和LGBTQI +青年方面。虽然这篇综述的重点是暴力,但有必要提醒的是,许多儿童经历了替代照料作为保护和培育,我们的研究结果不应被解释为表明所有照料安排都是有害的。加强以家庭为基础的照料,确保强有力的监督,嵌入保护性的、以儿童为中心的做法,并在可能的情况下优先考虑重返社会,这些对于减少风险和促进儿童福祉至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书