A typology on the diversity of transnational family relationships of unaccompanied minors in Germany: A constructivist grounded theory study

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Children and Youth Services Review Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108749
Franziska Anna Seidel
{"title":"A typology on the diversity of transnational family relationships of unaccompanied minors in Germany: A constructivist grounded theory study","authors":"Franziska Anna Seidel","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The transnational family lives of unaccompanied minors (UMs) have gained increasing attention in academic discourse. Transnational family relationships are highly heterogeneous.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study is to present a typology on the diversity of UMs’ transnational family relationships in order to gain a nuanced view on family relationships. This helps to structure and understand the diversity of experiences relating to transnational family relationships and can serve as a basis for more differentiated research and professional support in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This constructivist grounded theory study involved the analysis of 35 semi-structured interviews that were carried out in Germany with (former) UMs (n = 12), social workers/pedagogical staff (n = 20), and experts (n = 3).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five types of UMs' transnational family relationships were identified. Type 1 describes UMs who do not wish to maintain family contact across borders. Type 2 encompasses UMs who do not have the possibility to maintain transnational family relationships despite wishing to do so. Type 3 involves unstable/ambivalent transnational family relationships, and Type 4 refers to UMs with permanent/regular transnational family contact. Type 5 describes UMs in transition from transnational family contact to face to face contact. Specific characteristics, experiences and stressors, UMs’ aims, perspectives on family reunification, and need for social work support are presented with regard to each type.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study underscores the continued importance of transnational family relationships to displaced UMs and highlights the need to view the diversity of UMs’ transnational family relationships in a nuanced way in research and professional practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 108749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740926000022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The transnational family lives of unaccompanied minors (UMs) have gained increasing attention in academic discourse. Transnational family relationships are highly heterogeneous.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to present a typology on the diversity of UMs’ transnational family relationships in order to gain a nuanced view on family relationships. This helps to structure and understand the diversity of experiences relating to transnational family relationships and can serve as a basis for more differentiated research and professional support in practice.

Methods

This constructivist grounded theory study involved the analysis of 35 semi-structured interviews that were carried out in Germany with (former) UMs (n = 12), social workers/pedagogical staff (n = 20), and experts (n = 3).

Results

Five types of UMs' transnational family relationships were identified. Type 1 describes UMs who do not wish to maintain family contact across borders. Type 2 encompasses UMs who do not have the possibility to maintain transnational family relationships despite wishing to do so. Type 3 involves unstable/ambivalent transnational family relationships, and Type 4 refers to UMs with permanent/regular transnational family contact. Type 5 describes UMs in transition from transnational family contact to face to face contact. Specific characteristics, experiences and stressors, UMs’ aims, perspectives on family reunification, and need for social work support are presented with regard to each type.

Conclusion

This study underscores the continued importance of transnational family relationships to displaced UMs and highlights the need to view the diversity of UMs’ transnational family relationships in a nuanced way in research and professional practice.
德国无人陪伴未成年人跨国家庭关系多样性的类型学研究:基于建构主义的理论研究
无人陪伴未成年人的跨国家庭生活越来越受到学术界的关注。跨国家庭关系是高度异质的。目的本研究的目的是提出一种关于UMs跨国家庭关系多样性的类型学,以获得对家庭关系的细致入微的看法。这有助于组织和了解与跨国家庭关系有关的各种经验,并可作为在实践中进行更有区别的研究和专业支助的基础。方法:本建构主义理论研究涉及分析在德国进行的35次半结构化访谈,访谈对象包括(前)UMs (n = 12)、社会工作者/教学人员(n = 20)和专家(n = 3)。结果识别出5种不同类型的跨国家庭关系。类型1描述的是不希望跨境保持家庭联系的UMs。第2类包括那些尽管希望维持跨国家庭关系但却无法维持的家庭成员。类型3涉及不稳定/矛盾的跨国家庭关系,类型4是指具有长期/定期跨国家庭联系的UMs。类型5描述跨国家庭接触向面对面接触过渡的UMs。介绍了每种类型的具体特征、经验和压力源、UMs的目标、对家庭团聚的看法以及对社会工作支持的需求。本研究强调了跨国家庭关系对流离失所的UMs的持续重要性,并强调了在研究和专业实践中以细致入微的方式看待UMs跨国家庭关系多样性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书